PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 000104
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM NCOPDR EIB
a. Period entered for: 5 Years AAM(5th Awd) ASR
b. Entry date: 980914 GCMDL(3d Awd) OSR
c. Age: 29 Years DOB: 690217 NDSM KLM(K)
d. Educational level: HS Grad AFEM KLM(SA)
e. Aptitude area score: SWASM2/2BSS CIB
GT: 124 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E5
1 Year 3 Month(s) 21 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF (fiche)
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
990504 With intent to defraud and for procurement of items,
wrongfully and unlawfully make checks with insufficient
funds (Field Grade)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: Applicant also had prior USAR service. Dates of USAR
service
not in file. Total time in service calculated using the
DD
Form 214.
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
See #8 Remarks
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 890503 930106 Honorable
RA 930107 950223 Honorable
RA 950224 980913 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 7 September 1999, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—patterns
of misconduct, with an honorable discharge. The unit commander indicated
that he was initiating separation proceedings based on the applicant’s
pattern of indebtedness with civilian agencies and uttering numerous checks
without sufficient funds to both civilian and government agencies. He was
advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was
advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to appear
before an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving an
honorable discharge, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The
unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and
waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander
reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the
separation action with an honorable discharge. On 16 November 1999, the
applicant’s conditional waiver was denied and he was ordered to appear
before an administrative separation board. On 23 December 1999, the
applicant waived his right to appear before an administrative separation
board contingent upon receiving a general discharge. On 23 December 1999,
the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed
that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of
general, under honorable conditions.
b. On 4 January 2000, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 3 months, and 20 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 11
years, 9 months and 5 days of active military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040329.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, D.C. on 23 November
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (2) The discharge is improper.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board noted that the unit
commander used “Board Procedures” when notifying the applicant that she was
initiating action to separate her under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR
635-200, by reason of misconduct. By using “Board Procedures” the
authority for approval of the applicant’s separation rested with the
General Court-Martial Convening Authority. The evidence of record shows
that the applicant’s separation action was approved at the Special Court-
Martial Convening Authority level. In view of the foregoing, the Board
determined that the discharge was improper. Accordingly, the Board voted
to grant full relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of
service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for
separation to Secretarial Authority. This action does not entail a change
to the reentry eligibility (RE) code.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) See Paragraph 3, below.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( ) Proper.
( X ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
Honorable.
( X ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to Secretarial Authority
under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
( ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 5 0
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 26 November 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable.
( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to
Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: This action does not include a change in RE code.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2004106433 INDEX NUMBERS: A0108
Date of Review: 041123 A0154
Character of Service: GD A1200
Date of Discharge: 000104 A9500
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6750
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003090508
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than honorable and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 15 December 1999, the separation authority approved part of the findings and recommendations of the board and disapproved the probationary period for six months and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035821
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 16, Paragraph 16-6, AR 635-200 by reason of reduction in force with a characterization of service of honorable. After receipt of his voluntary request for discharge, the appropriate separating authority approved his request and he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 16, Paragraph 16-6, AR 635-200 by reason of reduction in force with a characterization of service of honorable. EXHIBITS: A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035816
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2000035816 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000320...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058797
On 25 May 2001, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 2001058797 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 010912 A9235 Character of Service: GD A0100 Date of Discharge:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002067980
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 2 February 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003099676
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 23 March 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 20 May 2001,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035800
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004100302
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040001625
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 000104 030330 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. That DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12(b) by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and the Board presumed Government regularity...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001052670
On 22 May 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...