PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 891103
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct-Minor Disciplinary Infractions
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ASR
a. Period entered for: 6 Years
b. Entry date: 890221
c. Age: 29 Years DOB: 591202
d. Educational level: 13 Years
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 111 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E3
0 Years 8 Months 11 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 890515-890518
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
890831 Broke restriction (890827)(Company Grade)
890817 Without authority, failed to go at the time prescribed to
his appointed place of duty (890806); Wrongfully disobeyed a
written lawful order issued by the Battalion Commander
(890806)(Company Grade)
890526 Wrongfully disobeyed a written lawful order issued by the
Brigade Commander (890513); Broke restriction (890513);
Without authority, failed to go at the time prescribed to his
appointed place of duty (890514); AWOL (890515-890518);
wrongfully used cocaine (890518)(Field Grade)
890508 Without authority, failed to go at the time prescribed to
his appointed place of duty (890506)(Summarized)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 7 September 1989, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a
general, under honorable conditions discharge. The reasons for the
discharge action was the applicant’s conduct and performance of duty showed
a severe lack of discipline and a lack of desire to become a productive
soldier. Additionally, mental health officials described the applicant as
immature and unable to fulfill the responsibilities necessary to be an
effective soldier and highly recommended an administrative separation as
soon as possible. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted
with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and
submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently
recommended separation from the service and waiver of further
rehabilitative efforts. On 19 September 1989, the intermediate commander
reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the
separation action with a general discharge. On 21 September 1989, the
separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed
that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of
general, under honorable conditions.
b. On 3 November 1989, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 8 months and 11 days of active
military service and accrued 3 days of lost time in the period under
review.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040102, with no enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( )Records review ( X ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 19 July 2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: six (6) documents.
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (4) The characterization of service is too harsh.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(4) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review
and heard his testimony. There was a full consideration of all faithful
and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent
thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. While the Board does not
condone the applicant’s misconduct, it determined that the characterization
of service is now inequitable. The Board found that the applicant’s
misconduct was mitigated by the elapse of time since his discharge and his
post service accomplishments. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant
partial relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to
fully honorable. However, the Board found that the reason for discharge
was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
(1-3) The issues are rejected. The Army Discharge Review Board is
not empowered to return former service members to active duty. If the
applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to
determine his eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a
former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are
required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes. (See
response to issue 4, above).
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
Honorable.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 3 2
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RON WILLIAMS
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 19 July 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change the characterization of discharge to “Honorable.”
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2004101268 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 040719 A9222
Character of Service: GD A0100
Date of Discharge: 891103
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6710
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 3-2 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999024782
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999024782...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003091630
Evidence of record shows that on 28 November 1989, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions (UOHC). ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct, Chapter 14, AR 635-200. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004106758
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Change characterization to Honorable. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant INDEX...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000046673
The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700298
Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 891026: Unit commander notified applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, for entry level status performance and conduct. CASE NO: AD97-00298 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL ALLEN Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048895
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. The applicant waived legal counsel, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000037598
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000047922
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 5 December 1989, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. ( X ) Both proper and equitable, but reason for separation cited was an...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999019489
The evidence of record shows that on 6 September 1991, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l3, AR 635 200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a general , under honorable conditions discharge (GD). EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999019489 INDEX NUMBERS: A9218 Date of Review: 990310 A9202 Character of Service: GD A0100 Date of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000045151
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A -...