PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 940613
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, Section II, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): Records Review/000802
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM ASR
a. Period entered for: 6 Years (8 Mos Ext) AAM (3) OSR
b. Entry date: 880426 (920522) GCMDL
c. Age: 30 Years DOB: 571117 NDSM
d. Educational level: HS Grad NCOPDR-3
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 110 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E6
6 Years 1 Month 18 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF (fiche)
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
USAR 770304 770510 NA
RA 770511 791214 Honorable
RA 791215 820527 Honorable
RA 820528 880425 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 17 February 1994, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of
misconduct—conviction by civil court, with an under other than honorable
conditions discharge. The reasons for the proposed action were attempted
rape, indecent acts with a child, indecent assault on a child, incest, and
sodomy. He was advised of his rights. On 22 February 1994, the applicant
consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge
action, requested a hearing by a board of officers, and did not submit a
statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended
separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The
intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and
recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than
honorable conditions discharge. The Assistant Staff Judge Advocate
determined the separation action to be legally sufficient. On 15 March
1994, the GCMCA directed that a board convene to determine whether the
applicant should be discharged. On 28 March 1994, the applicant was
notified of the impending Administrative Separation Board. On 9 May 1994,
the board of officers met; the applicant appeared with counsel. The board
recommended separation for misconduct-conviction by civil court with a
characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. On
23 May 1994, the separation authority directed that the applicant be
discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and
reduced to the lowest enlisted grade.
b. On 13 June 1994, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 6 years, 1 month, and 18 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 17
years, 1 month, and 3 days of total military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 031226, with four (4) enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( )Records review ( X ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 13 September
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
Counsel ( X ) Yes ( ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service is too harsh.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review
and heard his testimony. There was a full consideration of all faithful
and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent
thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. The Board does not condone
the applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the characterization
of service is too harsh. The Board found that the applicant provided
evidence of favorable post-service conduct to partially mitigate the
misconduct in his official record. However, the applicant, by his
misconduct diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a
fully honorable discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial
relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to general,
under honorable conditions. The Board determined that the reason for
discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
(1) The issue is rejected. See response to issue (2), above.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
General, Under Honorable Conditions.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 4 1
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 17 September 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to General, Under
Honorable Conditions.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: This action entails a restoration of grade to staff sergeant/E6.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2004101155 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 040913 A9222
Character of Service: UD A0113
Date of Discharge: 940613
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6100
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: GD 3-2 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000044012
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested a hearing by a board of officers and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000039380
Army policy states that the service of personnel separated under this regulation will be an honorable or general discharge, or under other than honorable discharge service. In that document the applicant stated, in effect, that he had been advised of the reason for the initiation of the involuntary separation action; that he had been informed of his right to appear before a board of officers; that he had the right to be represented by counsel; and, that he could submit statements in his own...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999015341
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999015341 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990203 A9201 Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000046176
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104165
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002077180
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 880909 910807 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004100304
Evidence of record shows that on 5 August 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999029231
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003097711
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 21 June 1994, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058256
On 22 December 1994, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...