DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Army Discharge Review Board
1901 South Bell Street
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
29 April 2005
Office of the President
The Army Discharge Review Board reviewed your case and determined
that relief is warranted. The Board has directed the ARBA Support
Division, St. Louis, MO, to take action as indicated on the enclosed OSA
Form 172, Case Report and Directive. This document reflects the findings,
conclusions, and reasons for the Board's decision. The official
notification of any change to your official military personnel record,
including the appropriate documentation, will be mailed to you by the ARBA
Support Division.
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not
responsive to the issues raised, or does not otherwise agree with the
decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a
complaint in accordance with Enclosure 5 of that directive. You should
read Enclosure 5 of that directive before submitting a complaint. The
complaint procedure does not permit you to challenge the merits of the
decision, but is designed solely to ensure that the decisional document
meets applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may
obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to: DA Review Boards
Agency, Attention: (Reading Room), The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-
1809.
Should you have any questions relating to the documentation
implementing the Board's decision, you should contact: ARBA Support
Division, ATTN: SFMR-RBL-SL, 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri, 63132-
5200.
Sincerely,
Robert L. House
Colonel, U.S. Army
President
Enclosure
MILITARY REVIEW BOARDS
Case Report & Directive
PART I - IDENTIFICATION DATA
NAME: ADDRESS:
PHONE:
COUNSEL: ADDRESS:
PHONE:
ALTERNATE PERSON(S) TO BE NOTIFIED: ADDRESS:
RELATIONSHIP: PHONE:
TYPE REPORT:
( X ) Original
( ) Addendum
REMARKS
Case Management Data
( ) Response to other correspondence required upon completion of case.
( ) DD Form 149 in file. Send case to ABCMR.
OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 22 May 98 Cover Sheet
PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 940815
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM
a. Period entered for: 6 Years AAM
b. Entry date: 900629 GCMDL(4th Awd)
c. Age: 33 Years DOB: 570118 AFRM
d. Educational level: HS Grad NCOPDRw/Num2
e. Aptitude area score: ASR
GT: 99 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E7
4 Year(s) 1 Month 16 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 750912 780901 Honorable
USAR 780902 840927 N/A
USAR (AGR) 840928 900629 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 10 November 1993, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of
misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with an under other than
honorable conditions discharge. The unit commander indicated that he was
initiating separation proceedings based on the applicant’s wrongful use of
cocaine. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal
counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and requested
appearance before a board of officers. The intermediate commander reviewed
the proposed discharge action, recommended an under other than honorable
conditions discharge, and forwarded the proposed discharge for board
action. On 13 June 1994, board of officers met; applicant appeared with
counsel. The board recommended separation with an under other than
honorable conditions discharge. On 29 June 1994, the separation authority
approved the findings and recommendations of the board, waived further
rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a
characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The
applicant was reduced to the lowest enlisted grade.
b. On 15 August 1994, the applicant was discharged from the Army
Reserve/Active Guard Reserve. At the time of discharge, the applicant had
completed 4 years, 1 month, and 16 days of active military service in the
period under review and had a total of 19 years, 3 months and 22 days of
military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel (to
include Army Reserve/Active Guard Reserve under Title 10.) Chapter l4
establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for
misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a
pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of
illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence
without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct
when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or
unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable
conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general
discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be
granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040825.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, D.C. on 27 April
2005.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (1) The discharge is improper.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is accepted. The Board noted that the unit
commander used “Board Procedures” when notifying the applicant that he was
initiating separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-
200, by reason of misconduct. By using “Board Procedures” the authority
for approval of the applicant’s separation rested with the General Court-
Martial Convening Authority. The evidence of record shows that the
applicant’s separation action was approved at the Special Court-Martial
Convening Authority level. In view of the foregoing, the Board determined
that the discharge was improper. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant
full relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to
fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to
Secretarial Authority. This action does not entail a change to the reentry
eligibility (RE) code.
b. Equity: The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
equity to change the discharge. The major factors upon
which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
and IV of this decisional document.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( ) Proper.
( X ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
Honorable.
( X ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to Secretarial Authority
under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
( ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 4 1
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 29 April 2005
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable.
( ) Change reason and authority for discharge to
Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200.
( ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: Restore grade to sergeant first class/E-7.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20040005957 INDEX NUMBERS: A0108
Date of Review: 050427 A0154
Character of Service: UD A1200
Date of Discharge: 940815 A9500
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6770
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004100305
On 28 June 1995, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 18 August 2004 The Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002076858
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 4 May 1995, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: JOHN F....
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025289
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999025289 INDEX NUMBERS: A9235 Date of Review: 990617 A9217 Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000045422
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. The applicant waived legal counsel, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A -...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999019272
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999019272 INDEX...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000039557
When discharged under this provision, Army policy states that the characterization of service will normally be under other than honorable conditions. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. AR Number: 2000039557 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000515 A0100 Character of Service: GD A9201 Date of Discharge: 960731 A9203 Authority: AR 135-178 C7 Reason: A6750 Results of Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001051171
The evidence of record shows that the command attempted to assist the applicant in performing and conducting himself to Army standards by providing counseling and by the imposition of nonjudicial punishment. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048377
On 10 May 1996, the applicant was discharged. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable,3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104175
On 5 May 1992, the applicant was discharged. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040005591
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case...