PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Honorable
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 950824
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM HSM
a. Period entered for: 4 Years (Ext 4 Mos) AAM (3) NCOPDR-1
b. Entry date: 910613 GCMDL (2) ASR
c. Age: 24 Years DOB: 670601 NDSM OSR
d. Educational level: HS Grad SWASM w/3BSS KLM
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 111 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E5
4 Years 2 Months 12 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF (fiche)
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: Locally imposed Bar to Reenlistment initiated on 950215
based on
the applicant’s incidents of disobeying a lawful order,
conduct
unbecoming of an NCO, and contributing to the delinquency of
a
minor. The bar action was approved on 950302. The applicant
acknowledged receipt of the approved bar on the same day and
elected not to appeal the action.
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 871110 910612 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 15 May 1995, the unit commander
notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the
provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of
misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The
reasons for the proposed action were he disrespected a commissioned
officer, disobeyed a lawful order, contributed to the delinquency of minors
by purchasing liquor for them, violated a Fort Huachuca regulation by
disobeying the speed limits, and larceny of a value of over $100. He was
advised of his rights. On 16 May 1995, the applicant consulted with legal
counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not
submit a statement in his own behalf. He was also entitled to have his
case considered by an administrative separation board, which he elected to
do. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the
service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 19 May 1995, the
intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and
recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under
honorable conditions discharge. On 5 June 1995, the applicant acknowledged
receipt of the notification to appear before an administrative separation
board. On 29 June 1995, an administrative separation board conducted the
proceedings in the applicant’s case. The applicant was present with his
defense counsel. Based on its findings, the Board recommended separation
with a characterization of service of honorable. On 19 July 1995, the
applicant submitted a rebuttal to the results of the administrative
separation board. On 1 August 1995, the proper legal authority reviewed
the administrative separation proceedings and concurred with the Board’s
findings and recommendations. On 1 August 1995, the separation authority
approved the Board’s findings and recommendations. The separation
authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the discharge
of the applicant with a characterization of service of honorable.
b. On 24 August 1995, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 4 years, 2 months, and 12 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 7
years, 9 months, and 15 days of total military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040611, with fifteen (15) enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 9 February
2005.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (2) The narrative reason for separation is
inequitable.
b. Request: ( ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) See Paragraph 3, below.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the
seriousness of the offenses. The Board does not condone the applicant’s
misconduct; however, determined that the narrative reason for separation is
now inequitable. The Board found that the narrative reason for separation
was mitigated by the nature of the offenses, the time that has elapsed
since the applicant’s discharge, and his post-service accomplishments.
Accordingly, the Board voted to grant full relief in the form of a change
to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. This
action entails a change in the RE code to “1.”
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( X ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to Secretarial
Authority
under Chapter 5, AR 635-200.
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 5 0
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 11 February 2005
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to
Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: This action entails a change to the RE code to “1.”
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20040003140 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 050209 A9222
Character of Service: HD A1200
Date of Discharge: 950824
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6750
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: MD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003096339
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003093988
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058808
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2001058808 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 010822 A9301 Character of Service: GD A9307 Date of Discharge: 950824 A0100 Authority: AR 635-200 C14 Reason: A6730 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004100706
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 6 December 1995, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action; however, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999022204
Accordingly, the Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number:...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072274C070403
On 15 December 1995, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701553
950913: Applicant was discharged.2. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. CASE NO: AD97-01553 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MS. CHANDLER Case Analyst and Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003090506
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999017479
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 990104. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004106630
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 24 October 1995, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case...