PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 010518
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200
b. Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM AFRM
a. Period entered for: 6 Years AAM (2) NCOPDR-2
b. Entry date: 990208 GCMDL (2) ASR
c. Age: 35 Years DOB: 631101 ARCAM
d. Educational level: GED NDSM
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 85 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E7
1 Year 8 Months 11 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF/Fiche
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 001005-001009
001023-001028
Mil conf
Civil conf 001029-010518
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
USAR 830514 830804 NA
ADT 830805 831111 Uncharacterized
USAR 831112 900927 NA
AGR 900928 990207 Honorable
(Concurrent Service)
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s
discharge are not contained in the available records. The record contains
a memorandum by the Staff Judge Advocate, dated 20 April 2001, concerning
the applicant’s request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial,
which is not in the available records. It indicates that on 29 June 2000,
the applicant was charged with three (3) specifications of stealing
military property of the U.S. Government, one (1) specification of making a
false official statement, one specification (1) of fraud against the United
States, and one (1) specification of forgery. It also indicates that the
unit and intermediate commander recommended approval of the applicant’s
request. On 20 April 2001, the separation authority approved the discharge
with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and reduction to
Private E-1. The record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). His DD Form 214
indicates that he was discharged from active duty under the provisions of
Chapter 10, AR 635-200 by reason in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a
characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
b. On 18 May 2001, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 8 months, and 11 days of
active military service and accrued 210 days of lost time (9 days of AWOL
and 201 days of civil confinement) in the period under review. He had a
total of 17 years, 11 months, and 24 days of total military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
UOHC is normally considered appropriate.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040322, with multiple enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 12 January
2005.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1-5), (8), (14-18), and (22-24) The issues are rejected. The
Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the
period of enlistment under review. There was a full consideration of all
faithful and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline,
the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. The Board noted
the applicant’s contentions; however, did not find said contentions
sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of the discharge under
review. The Board found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious action on
the part of the applicant’s chain of command. Contrary to the applicant’s
contentions, the Board found sufficient evidence of serious misconduct in
the applicant’s record to support the separation action under review. The
evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of
offenses punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with
a punitive discharge. Procedurally, after consulting with defense counsel,
the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the
Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, the applicant
admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the
UCMJ. In the absence of information to the contrary, the Board was
satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the
rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation
process. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type
of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the
applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board,
being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of
service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.
(6) and (7) The issues are rejected. The matters addressed in
these issues do not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review
Board.
(9-13), and (19-21) The issues are rejected. The issues raise no
element of fact, law, procedure or discretion pertaining to the applicant’s
discharge process.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 20040001611 INDEX NUMBERS: A9235
Date of Review: 050112 A9217
Character of Service: UD A9307
Date of Discharge: 010518 A9309
Authority: AR 635-200 C18 A9321
Reason: A7000 A9447
Results of Board Action/ A9445
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A A0113
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003091110
On 18 May 2001, the applicant was discharged. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3.
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040002275
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Minority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002076886
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Minority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003085967
On 18 May 2001, the applicant was discharged. The Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the characterization of service was inequitable because the applicant's generally acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty mitigated the discrediting entries in the service record. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003099004
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025114
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024862
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999022355
It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999022379
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999023640
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board,...