PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 000607
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200
b. Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ASR
a. Period entered for: 4 Years
b. Entry date: 970604
c. Age: 18 Years DOB: 790428
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: NIF 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E2
2 Years 1 Month 10 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 990208-991229
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was reported AWOL
effective 8 February 1999. He was DFR’d on 10 March 1999. On 11 May 1999,
the applicant was apprehended by the civilian authorities in Tucson,
Arizona and held in the Arizona State Prison on civil charges of fraud and
artifist. On 22 May 1999, the applicant was convicted on the above charges
and sentenced to one year in the Arizona State Prison, Tucson, Arizona. On
29 December 1999, he was returned to military control at Fort Sill, OK. On
30 December 1999, the applicant was charged with AWOL. On 30 December
1999, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested,
in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in
lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted
guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant
indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than
honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a
significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The applicant
did not submit a statement in his own behalf and did not desire a physical
evaluation prior to separation. On 30 December 1999, the applicant was
placed on involuntary excess leave pending completion of his administrative
discharge proceeding under Chapter 10, AR 635-200. On 6 April 2000, the
unit commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable
conditions discharge. On 15 May 2000, the proper legal authority reviewed
the discharge request and found no legal objection to further processing of
the separation action. On 16 May 2000, the separation authority approved
the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
b. On 7 June 2000, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 1 month, and 10 days of
active military service (which included 161 days of excess leave), and
accrued 325 days of lost time in the period under review.
c. While in AWOL status, the applicant was apprehended by civil
authorities in Tucson, Arizona, and charged with fraud and artifist. DD
Form 616 (Report of Return of Absentee) shows that the applicant was
returned to military control from Arizona State Prison on 11 May 1999.
However, this appears to be incorrect. Further evidence shows that the
applicant was convicted on 22 May 1999 of the above charges and that he
received a one-year sentence. In June 1999, he was released from prison
and placed on probation. On 14 July 1999, he violated his probation, and
was returned to prison on a warrant issued on 23 July 1999. He remained in
civil confinement until he was released to military control at Fort Sill,
OK, on 29 December 1999. The Army considered all of the applicant’s lost
time as AWOL.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030919, with no enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 3 August
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as infraction of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness
of the offense.
The Board noted the applicant’s contentions; however, the official record
does not support the applicant’s contentions and the Board determined that
his contentions were not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of
the discharge under review. The evidence of record shows the applicant was
charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code
of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. The Board noted
that, after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and
in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-
martial. In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or
lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ. The Board was satisfied that all
requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant
were fully protected throughout the separation process. It also noted that
the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally
under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of
that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the
reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper
and equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2003099123 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217
Date of Review: 040803 A9321
Character of Service: UD A0113
Date of Discharge: 000607
Authority: AR 635-200 C10
Reason: A7000
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002078144
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 830913 860712 Honorable USARCG 860713 930912 Honorable ARNGUS 960427 980510 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003096825
It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001056149
SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): ServiceFromToType Discharge RA 950226 980000 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEWSECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances:a. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004106567
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 16 May 2000, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003098568
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002066285
Evidence of record shows that on 24 May 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 1 June 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000041869
On 9 May 1997, the applicant was discharged. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105400
SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000041206
It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003095524
However, the Board directs that the applicant’s discharge order from the Reserve of the Army, issued by the State of Arizona, be changed to reflect a characterization of service of honorable. Remarks: This action entails a change to the applicant’s discharge from the Reserve of the Army to reflect an Honorable characterization of service. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant...