PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Honorable

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  020124

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 5-13, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Personality Disorder

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           ASR
    a.  Period entered for:  4 Years
    b.  Entry date:  000802
    c.  Age:  19 Years   DOB:  801029


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  102                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E3
          1 Year(s)  5 Month(s)  23 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:

      Date  Offense(s)
      001101     Wrongful use of methylenedioxymethamphetamine on (000828-
                 000903); wrongful use of marijuana on (000828-000903);
and,
                 with intent to deceive make a false official statement to
a
                 special agent on (001005);


7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  The official record contains a CID Investigation dated
                 (001010); and, a Military Police Report dated (011226).


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data


Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge
      USAR  980130     990715     NA
      ADT   990716     990828     Uncharacterized
      USAR  990829     000801     NA




                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 19 November 2001, the applicant
was diagnosed with a personality disorder, not otherwise specified and
recommended for discharge.  On 14 January 2002, the unit commander notified
the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of
Chapter 5, AR 635-200, by reason of a personality disorder, with an
honorable discharge.  She was advised of her rights.  The applicant
consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge
action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit
commander subsequently recommended separation from the service.  The
intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and
recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge.
On 17 January 2002, the separation authority directed that the applicant be
discharged with a characterization of service of honorable.

      b.  On 24 January 2002, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 5 months, and 23 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 3
years, 11  months and 24 days of active military service.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Paragraph 5-13 provides that a soldier may be separated for personality
disorder, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40, that
interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation
requires that the condition be a deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern of
behavior of long duration that interferes with the soldiers’ ability to
perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the
soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly
impaired.  The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action
prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action, and that
separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is
warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army regulation
604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40.  Army policy requires the award of a
fully honorable discharge in such cases.



                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, undated, with one (1) enclosure(s).
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 10 May
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  (   ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
 There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the
seriousness of the offenses.  The Board noted the applicant’s contentions,
however, she has not provided any probative medical evidence refuting the
initial diagnosis of a personality disorder while in the service.
Notwithstanding the evidence she submitted showing that she is in receipt
of VA service-connected compensation for post-traumatic stress disorder
which she relates to a rape while in the Army, she has failed to submit the
medical evidence the VA relied upon to make its decision and her service
medical records are not available for review.  The Board found no evidence
of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The evidence shows
that, when initially offered counseling for an alleged sexual assault, the
applicant refused the counseling, and did not raise it as an issue until
she filed a complaint with her congressional representative.  The Board was
satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the
rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation
process.  The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge was both
proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2003095933                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A9455
Date of Review:  040510                                   A9323
Character of Service:  HD                                 A0113
Date of Discharge:  020124
Authority:  AR 635-200 C5
Reason:  A4600
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X