PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Uncharacterized

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  020821

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 15, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Homosexual Admission

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           NONE
    a.  Period entered for:  24 Weeks
    b.  Entry date:  020718
    c.  Age:  26 Years   DOB:  751122
    d.  Educational level:  GED
    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  96                                3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E1
          0 Years  1 Months  4 Days

                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s
discharge are not contained in the available records.  The record contains
a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.
Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of
Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission,
with an uncharacterized separation of service.  Furthermore, the DD Form
214 shows a Separation Code of JRB (i.e., homosexual admission), and an RE
code of 4.

      b.  On 21 August 2002, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 1 month, and 4 days of active
military service in the period under review.

      c.  On 18 June 2002, the applicant enlisted into the Army National
Guard of the United States (ARNGUS).  On 18 June 2002, she was ordered to
Initial Active Duty for Training (IADT).  On 18 July 2002, she reported for
training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina.  On 21 August 2002, she was
released from IADT and discharged from the Reserve of the Army and returned
to the ARNGUS.  The applicant was subsequently discharged from the ARNGUS,
effective 21 August 2002.  The record contains a properly constituted NGB
Form 22E (Department of the Army and Air Force National Guard Bureau Report
of Separation and Record of Service), indicating that she was discharged
under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-26h, NGR 600-200, by reason
of homosexual conduct, with service uncharacterized and an RE code of 4.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter 15 of that regulation states that active homosexuality is
incompatible with military service and provides, in pertinent part, for the
separation of members who actively engage in homosexual conduct or who, by
their statements, demonstrate a tendency to engage in homosexual conduct.
The type of discharge will reflect the character of the soldier’s overall
record of service.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated (undated), with no enclosures.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, DC on 28 April
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The applicant’s record is void of the
specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to her
release from active duty for training and discharge from the Reserve of the
Army.  The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly
constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  This document
identifies the reason and characterization of the separation/discharge and
the Board presumed Government regularity in the separation/discharge
process.  The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in entry-level
status, was release from active duty for training and discharge from the
Reserve of the Army under the provisions of Chapter 15, Paragraph 15-3B, AR
635-200, by reason of homosexual admission with service uncharacterized.
That DD Form 214 also shows that the applicant was properly assigned a
reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4” based on her narrative reason for
separation (i.e., homosexual admission).  An RE-4 indicates that the
applicant was discharged with a disqualification (i.e., her homosexual
admission) that cannot be waived and is no longer eligible to reenlist.  A
soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous
active military service.  Pertinent regulations provide that except in
cases of serious misconduct, a soldier’s service will be uncharacterized
when her separation is initiated while the soldier is in an entry-level
status.  A general discharge is not authorized under entry-level status
conditions.  A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which
are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding
personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The Board determined that no
such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his
service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  The Board noted the
applicant’s contentions; however, did not find said contentions
sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of the discharge under
review.  The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the
characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny
relief.

      b.  Equity:      The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
                   and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
                   equity to change the discharge.  The major factors upon
                   which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
                   and IV of this decisional document.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2003095620                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A0143
Date of Review:  040428                                   A0113
Character of Service:  EL                                 A9445
Date of Discharge:  020821
Authority:  AR 635-200 C15
Reason:  A5900
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X