Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094279
Original file (AR2003094279.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                         PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  General, Under Honorable Conditions

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  030117

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  AR 600-43

      b.  Reason:  Conscientious Objector

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           ARCOM
    a.  Period entered for:  5 Years               AAM(2nd Awd)
    b.  Entry date:  990930                        GCMDL
    c.  Age:  24 Years   DOB:  741106              NDSM


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad                ASR


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  NIF                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E4
          3 Year(s)  3 Month(s)  18 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 29 April 2002, the applicant
voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of AR 600-43 as a
conscientious objector.  In accordance with Chapter 2, AR 600-43, an
investigating officer was appointed to determine whether the applicant met
the requirements for discharge as a conscientious objector.  On 15 July
2002, the applicant attended a Conscientious Objector Hearing as mandated
by regulation to present evidence in support of his claim.  On 28 July
2002, the investigating officer sustained the applicant’s request for
discharge under the provisions of AR 600-43 and forwarded his request to
the court-martial convening authority for approval.  On 29 October 2002,
the court-martial convening authority recommended approval of the
applicant’s request and forwarded his request to the DA Conscientious
Objector Review Board (DACORB) for approval.  On 20 November 2002, the
DACORB approved the applicant’s request and directed that he be separated
in accordance with AR 600-43 as a conscientious objector.  Characterization
of service was to be determined by the applicant’s command.  On 20 January
2002, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged
with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service.

      b.  On 17 January 2003, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 3 years, 3 months, and 18 days of
active military service in the period under review.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 600-43
sets for policy, criteria, responsibilities, and procedures to classify and
dispose of military personnel who claim conscientious objection to
participation in war in any form or to the bearing of arms.  An honorable
or a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service may be
given.




                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 030730, with three (3) enclosure(s).
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 28 April
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          ( X )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

        Board Issue:  (4)  The characterization of service was too harsh.

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (4)  The issue is accepted.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
 The Board determined that the characterization of service was inequitable
because the applicant was discharged solely based upon his voluntary
request as a conscientious objector.  The Board noted the absence of any
derogatory information in the applicant’s official record and determined
that he served honorably and faithfully earning an Army Commendation Medal,
two Army Achievement Medals, and the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Given the
above, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of
characterization of service to fully honorable.  The Board determined that
the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change
it.

        (1-3)  See Paragraph 3, below.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):

    Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
response to the remaining issues is neither required nor rendered.


                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      (   ) Equitable.
      ( X ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
           Honorable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       5         0

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis      Date:   30 April 2004

     The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):

           ( X ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable.

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2003094279                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A9406
Date of Review:  040428                                   A9218
Character of Service:  GD                                 A0100
Date of Discharge:  030117
Authority:  AR 600-43
Reason:  A2300
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  HD 5-0 A









                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X       X                 

    2.      Mbr          X       X                 

    3.      Mbr          X       X                 

    4.      Mbr          X       X                 

    5.      PO           X       X                 






Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003876

    Original file (AR20090003876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant states "My discharge should be changed due to the fact I served with my unit respectively and honorably. On 5 October 2003, the court-martial convening authority reviewed the applicant's request, recommended approval, and forwarded the former soldier's request to the Department of the Army Conscientious Objector Review Board (DACORB) for approval. On 30 January 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a general, under honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110024117

    Original file (AR20110024117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 September 1999, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of AR 600-43, as a conscientious objector. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the applicant did not provide...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700675

    Original file (199700675.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950707: The board recommended the applicant be discharged from the Service. 950726: Applicant was discharged. CASE NO: AD97-00675 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR X X X X X X X X X X

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012243

    Original file (AR20060012243.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 05 Mos, 04 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh and as a result it is inequitable, based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020314

    Original file (20120020314.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting separation based on Conscientious Objection, dated 3 March 2004, and all allied documents his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)). After thorough examination of the Case Record, the DACORB determined the applicant did not present convincing evidence in accordance with Army Regulation 600-43 that his stated beliefs warranted award of 1-0...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004099931

    Original file (AR2004099931.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 16 December 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. SECTION B -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084406

    Original file (2003084406.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2002, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013126

    Original file (20140013126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to remove from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting separation based upon conscientious objection, dated 3 March 2004, and the allied documents, including documents related to the original decision made by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant states the ABCMR concluded that the conscientious objection application was properly filed in the service...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084440

    Original file (2003084440.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct, AR 635-200. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084102

    Original file (2003084102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. PART VII -...