PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 030117
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: AR 600-43
b. Reason: Conscientious Objector
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM
a. Period entered for: 5 Years AAM(2nd Awd)
b. Entry date: 990930 GCMDL
c. Age: 24 Years DOB: 741106 NDSM
d. Educational level: HS Grad ASR
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: NIF 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
3 Year(s) 3 Month(s) 18 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 29 April 2002, the applicant
voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of AR 600-43 as a
conscientious objector. In accordance with Chapter 2, AR 600-43, an
investigating officer was appointed to determine whether the applicant met
the requirements for discharge as a conscientious objector. On 15 July
2002, the applicant attended a Conscientious Objector Hearing as mandated
by regulation to present evidence in support of his claim. On 28 July
2002, the investigating officer sustained the applicant’s request for
discharge under the provisions of AR 600-43 and forwarded his request to
the court-martial convening authority for approval. On 29 October 2002,
the court-martial convening authority recommended approval of the
applicant’s request and forwarded his request to the DA Conscientious
Objector Review Board (DACORB) for approval. On 20 November 2002, the
DACORB approved the applicant’s request and directed that he be separated
in accordance with AR 600-43 as a conscientious objector. Characterization
of service was to be determined by the applicant’s command. On 20 January
2002, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged
with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service.
b. On 17 January 2003, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 3 years, 3 months, and 18 days of
active military service in the period under review.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 600-43
sets for policy, criteria, responsibilities, and procedures to classify and
dispose of military personnel who claim conscientious objection to
participation in war in any form or to the bearing of arms. An honorable
or a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service may be
given.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030730, with three (3) enclosure(s).
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, D.C. on 28 April
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (4) The characterization of service was too harsh.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(4) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
The Board determined that the characterization of service was inequitable
because the applicant was discharged solely based upon his voluntary
request as a conscientious objector. The Board noted the absence of any
derogatory information in the applicant’s official record and determined
that he served honorably and faithfully earning an Army Commendation Medal,
two Army Achievement Medals, and the Army Good Conduct Medal. Given the
above, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of
characterization of service to fully honorable. The Board determined that
the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change
it.
(1-3) See Paragraph 3, below.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested,
response to the remaining issues is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
Honorable.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 30 April 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2003094279 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 040428 A9218
Character of Service: GD A0100
Date of Discharge: 030117
Authority: AR 600-43
Reason: A2300
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003876
The Applicant states "My discharge should be changed due to the fact I served with my unit respectively and honorably. On 5 October 2003, the court-martial convening authority reviewed the applicant's request, recommended approval, and forwarded the former soldier's request to the Department of the Army Conscientious Objector Review Board (DACORB) for approval. On 30 January 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110024117
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 September 1999, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of AR 600-43, as a conscientious objector. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the applicant did not provide...
ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700675
950707: The board recommended the applicant be discharged from the Service. 950726: Applicant was discharged. CASE NO: AD97-00675 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR X X X X X X X X X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012243
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 05 Mos, 04 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh and as a result it is inequitable, based...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020314
The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting separation based on Conscientious Objection, dated 3 March 2004, and all allied documents his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)). After thorough examination of the Case Record, the DACORB determined the applicant did not present convincing evidence in accordance with Army Regulation 600-43 that his stated beliefs warranted award of 1-0...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004099931
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 16 December 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084406
On 23 May 2002, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013126
The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to remove from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting separation based upon conscientious objection, dated 3 March 2004, and the allied documents, including documents related to the original decision made by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant states the ABCMR concluded that the conscientious objection application was properly filed in the service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084440
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct, AR 635-200. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084102
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. PART VII -...