PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Uncharacterized

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  000120

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 11, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Entry Level Performance and Conduct

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           NONE
    a.  Period entered for:  4 Years
    b.  Entry date:  990920
    c.  Age:  19 Years   DOB:  800714


    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  112                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E2
          0 Year(s)  4 Month(s)  3 Day(s)

                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  On 18 January 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of
initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter
11, entry-level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized discharge.
She was advised of her rights.  The applicant waived her right to consult
with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and
did not submit a statement on her behalf.  The unit commander subsequently
recommended approval of the discharge action and forwarded it through
command channels to the separation authority.  The intermediate commanders
reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with an
uncharacterized discharge.  On 18 January 2000, the separation authority
waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be
discharged with an uncharacterized discharge.

      b.  On 20 January 2000, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 4 months and 3 days of active
military service in the period under review.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter 11, of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided, for the
separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or
both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of regulation applied
to individuals who had demonstrated that they were not qualified for
retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military
life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation or self
discipline for military service, or that they had demonstrated
characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service.  The
separation policy applies to soldiers who cannot meet the minimum standards
prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of
aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline.  The regulation requires
uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 030624.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 18 February
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
 The Board noted from the evidence of record that the applicant was
properly discharged while in an entry-level status (ELS) with service
uncharacterized.  The separation authority approved the applicant's
discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as
uncharacterized.  A soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days
of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to
provide the soldier a probationary period.  Soldiers who are found to lack
the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or
attitude to become productive soldiers may be expeditiously separated while
in entry-level status.  This is not an adverse separation action and
denotes only that the individual had less than l80 days on active duty.  A
fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly
warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct
and/or performance of duty.  The Board determined that no such unusual
circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did
not warrant an honorable discharge.  The Board noted the applicant’s
contentions; however, there is no medical evidence available in the
official record which shows that the applicant was discharged because of a
broken hip.  The official record shows that the applicant’s chain of
command recommended her for an entry-level separation due to lack of
motivation and failure to adapt to military service.  The applicant’s issue
regarding access to veteran’s medical benefits is not within the purview of
this Board and the applicant must address this issue with the Department of
Veteran Affairs.  The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge
and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted
to deny relief.

      b.  Equity:      The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
                   and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
                   equity to change the discharge.  The major factors upon
                   which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
                   and IV of this decisional document.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  2003092899                    INDEX NUMBERS:  A0113
Date of Review:  040218                                   A9500
Character of Service:  EL
Date of Discharge:  000120
Authority:  AR 635-200 C11
Reason:  A2900
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X