PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 010925
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): Records Review/030205
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM ASR
a. Period entered for: 6 Years AAM (2) OSR
b. Entry date: 980221 GCMDL (3)
c. Age: 26 Years DOB: 720121 NDSM
d. Educational level: HS Grad NCOPDR-2
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 115 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E6
3 Years 7 Months 5 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF/Fiche
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
010312 Found drunk on duty (010124)(Summarized)
010731 Made a false official statement (010618); violated a
lawful general regulation by wrongfully engaging in an unduly
familiar relation with your subordinates (010621); committed
an indecent assault upon a female, a person not your wife
(010621)(Field Grade)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
USMCR 900520 901125 NA
USMC 901126 941125 Honorable
USMCR 941126 960220 NA
RA 960221 980220 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that on 24 August 2001, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern
of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The
specific reasons for this action included being found drunk on duty (24
January 2001); falsifying an official document (18 June 2001);
fraternization with his junior soldiers (21 June 2001); and committing an
indecent assault on a female, not his wife (21 June 2001). He was advised
of his rights. On 24 August 2001, the applicant consulted with legal
counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived
consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent
upon receiving a characterization of service no les favorable than general,
under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own
behalf. On 27 August 2001, the unit commander subsequently recommended
separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.
On 29 August 2001, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed
discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a
general discharge. On 5 September 2001, the separation authority waived
further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be
discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable
conditions.
b. On 25 September 2001, the applicant was discharged. At the time
of discharge, the applicant had completed 3 years, 7 months, and 5 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 11
years, 4 months and 5 days of active military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030319, with eleven (11) enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( )Records review ( X ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Chicago, IL on 20 April 2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: one additional issue.
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
Board Issue: (3) The characterization of service is too harsh.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(3) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review
and heard his testimony. There was a full consideration of all faithful
and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent
thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. The Board does not condone
the applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the characterization
of service is now inequitable. The Board found that the applicant
presented mitigating personal problems which led to his consumption of
alcohol which ultimately led to his poor decision-making and subsequent
misconduct. Additionally, the applicant presented evidence of favorable
post-service conduct, to include attendance at an institution of higher
education and laudatory statements from the city major and chief of police
attesting to his good character and community contributions. In view of
the above, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an
upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable.
(1) and (2) The issues are rejected. The Board found that the
reason of discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted not to change
it.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
Honorable.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 30 April 2004
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2003087282 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 040420 A9308
Character of Service: GD A9222
Date of Discharge: 010925 A0113
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6750
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003094112
On 11 March 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003092471
SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 880113 920112 Honorable USAR 990112 010111 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Change characterization to Honorable. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003094235
Evidence of record shows that on 3 October 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of General, Under Honorable Conditions. Voting record: ChangeNo Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 5 0 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002067314
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 25 August 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040003319
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 21 January 2005 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003089622
On 21 November 2001, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | ar20050001731
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived an appearance before an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a general discharge, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The Board noted that the unit commander used “Board Procedures” when notifying the applicant that he was initiating separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635- 200, by reason of misconduct. SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084454
( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct, AR 635-200. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003088792
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONEOther discharge(s): ServiceFromToType Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEWSECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances:. On 5 March 2002, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions (UOHC). EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001059091
Evidence of record shows that on 4 February 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B -...