PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 911220
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200
b. Reason: Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): Records Review (960718)
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM (2nd Awd) NCOPDRw/Num3
a. Period entered for: 6 Years GCMDL (5th Awd) ASR
b. Entry date: 851001 NDSM OSR
c. Age: 42 Years DOB: 430201
d. Educational level: Col Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 153 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E7
6 Years 2 Months 20 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF (fiche)
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: Refer to the applicant’s OMPF for the U.S. District Court’s
Post-Sentence Report, dated 18 May 1989. It appears the
applicant has lost time due to AWOL and lost time due to
civilian confinement from 880423-911220. Lost time is not
reflected on the applicant’s DD Form 214.
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 630805 670206 Honorable
USARCGP 670207 671002 Honorable
RA 740627 780514 Honorable
RA 780515 830602 Honorable
RA 830603 850930 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence of record shows that on 23 April 1988, the applicant
was arrested by U.S. Customs for importation of cocaine and possession with
intent to distribute cocaine. The applicant was detained without bond and
appeared before a U.S. District Court on 30 September 1988. He pled not
guilty, but was found guilty of both charges and sentenced to prison for 10
years. The unit commander subsequently notified the applicant of
initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-
200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with an under
other than honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 17 July 1991 the applicant acknowledged notification, waived legal
counsel, waived a hearing by a board of officers, and did not submit a
statement in his own behalf. On 5 August 1991, the unit commander
recommended separation from the service. On 27 August 1991, the
intermediate commander concurred with the unit commander’s recommendation,
with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 13 September
1991, the separation authority approved the separation with a
characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
b. On 20 December 1991, the applicant was discharged. At the time
of discharge, the applicant had completed 6 years, 2 months and 20 days of
active military service in the period under review and had a total of 21
years, 7 months, and 22 days of total military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating
members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to
include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities, and
desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a
member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is
impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other
than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but
a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge
may be granted.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 030225, with 18 enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( )Records review ( X ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Los Angeles, CA on 25 February
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: 1 additional issue – narrative
reason.
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of
propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review
and heard his testimony. There was a full consideration of all faithful
and honorable service as well as the infraction of discipline, the extent
thereof, and the seriousness of the offense. Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200,
sets forth the procedures for separating individuals who commit serious
offenses if the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation.
The applicant’s command determined that the applicant’s civilian conviction
for importation of cocaine and intent to sell cocaine were serious offenses
and that this misconduct warranted separation from the Army. The
applicant's discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was
not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct
and performance of duty by military personnel. By misconduct, the
applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully
honorable or general discharge. The applicant provided no independent
corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was
erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor
duty performance. The Board notes the applicant’s letter and other
documents with his application outlining his successful accomplishments
since separation from active duty. The applicant is to be commended for
his efforts. However, these accomplishments do not provide the Board a
basis upon which to grant relief. Individuals are assigned RE codes based
on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was
appropriately assigned an RE code of 3 because he was separated under the
provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14, by reason of misconduct. This Board
found no bases upon which to change the applicant’s reason for discharge
because it was properly based upon his record of misconduct during his
tenure of service. The Board, being convinced that the reason for
discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and
equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 2 3
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2003085896 INDEX NUMBERS: A9405
Date of Review: 040225 A9217
Character of Service: UD A9235
Date of Discharge: 911220 A0113
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6730
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 3-2 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025601
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999025601 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990526 A9455 Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003095880
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge. On 20 June 1991, the applicant was discharged. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003093197
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct, Chapter 14, AR 635-200. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998012895
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) The Board determined that the characterization of service discharge was inequitable because the quality of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000040936
Applicant’s Issue : (1) The issue is rejected.The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. AR Number: 2000040936 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000517 A0100 Character of Service: GD A9307 Date of Discharge: 910402 A9411 Authority: AR 635-200 C14 Reason: A6730 Results of...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 99032435
The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. AR Number: 1999032435 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 991117 A0100 Character of Service: GD A9500 Date of Discharge: 920828 Authority: AR 635-200...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003097360
On 17 June 1991, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by appearing before an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Voting record: Change No Change Reason 3 2 Characterization 0 5 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. Minority views: NONE PART VII -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000043837
The applicant acknowledged notification, consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested a hearing by a board of officers and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The board recommended separation for misconduct with a characterization of under other than honorable conditions. On 3 July 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003094291
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general discharge, and submitted a statement in his behalf. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058113
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 17 August 2001 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the...