Upgrade.Vet

ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003099106

Original file (2003099106.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 000215

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200

         b. Reason: Misconduct

4. Prior review(s): NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                           ARCOM (2) HSM CIB
a. Period entered for: 3 Years AAM (3) NCOPDR-2 EIB
b. Entry date: 980814 GCMDL (3) ASR
c. Age: 27 Years DOB: 700827 NDSM OSR (2)
d. Educational level: 13 Years AFEM UNSM
e. Aptitude area score:
         GT: 115 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E6
1 Year 6 Months 2 Days

4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF (fiche)

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other

6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE

         Date     Offense(s)


7. Court-Martial data: NONE

         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)


         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

8.       Remarks: NONE

SECTION B - Prior Service Data

Other discharge(s):

         Service From      To        Type Discharge
         RA       880303   910827   Honorable
         RA       910828   940130   Honorable
         RA       940131   960521   Honorable
         RA       960522   980813   Honorable

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:

         a. The evidence of record shows that on 13 January 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The specific reason was that the applicant tested positive for the use of cocaine. He was advised of his rights. On 18 January 2000, the applicant acknowledged notification, consulted with legal counsel, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander recommended separation from the service with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander concurred with the unit commander and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 January 2000, the appropriate legal authority reviewed the discharge packet and had no legal objections for further processing. On 7 February 2000, the separation authority approved the separation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

         b. On 15 February 2000, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 6 months and 2 days of active military service in the period under review and had a total of 11 years, 11 months, and 13 days of total military service.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities, and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS

1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 031115, with two (2) enclosures.
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion

Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor

a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):

PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing

         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Los Angeles, CA on 26 February 2004 .

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
         Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No

         e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No

         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

         ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( X )   Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:

Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service is too harsh.

         b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason

2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

         a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

         b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.

(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infraction of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offense. While the Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct, it determined that the characterization of service was inequitable. The Board found that the overall length and quality of the applicant’s service to include his awards and decorations mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record . Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable. The Board determined that the narrative reason for separation was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.

(1) See response to paragraph 3, below.

3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):

Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested, response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered.

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

         ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .

         ( )      Equitable.
         ( X )    Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to Honorable .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                    under                          .

2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 5 0

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508

3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified


MR. RON WILLIAMS
Case Reviewing Official

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 5 March 2004

The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s):

( X )   Change the characterization of discharge to Honorable .

SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:

SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:

MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number: 2003099106 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 040226 A9218
Character of Service: GD A0113
Date of Discharge: 000215
Authority: AR 635-200 C14
Reason: A6770
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A

PART IX - VOTING RECORD

Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr     X X

2.      Mbr     X X

3.      Mbr     X X

4.      Mbr     X X

5.      PO     X X

Similar Decisions

ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002078076

Original file (2002078076.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 950201 970827 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001057875

Original file (2001057875.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. On 17 January 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000037772

Original file (2000037772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2000037772 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000315 A0100 Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003090782

Original file (2003090782.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000038610

Original file (2000038610.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 000215. The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003096543

Original file (AR2003096543.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Regulations currently in effect list the reason for the applicant’s separation as “Physical Standards.” Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason for discharge to “Physical Standards” and a corresponding change to the separation code to “LFT.” (1) See...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000044207

Original file (2000044207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: AR2000044207 INDEX NUMBERS: A9405 Date of Review: 000823...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001052952

Original file (2001052952.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2001052952 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 010418...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004102899

Original file (AR2004102899.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RON WILLIAMS Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000037768

Original file (2000037768.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Voting record: ChangeNo Change Reason 1 4 Characterization 5 0 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003099106

Similar Decisions