PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Honorable
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 880715
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 16, AR 635-200
b. Reason: DA Imposed Bar to Reenlistment
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
GCMDL(4thAwd)
a. Period entered for: 3 Years NDSM
b. Entry date: 860418 NCOPDR(2)
c. Age: 30 Years DOB: 551109 ASR
d. Educational level: HS Grad OSR(2)
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 98 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E5
2 Year(s) 2 Month(s) 28 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
_________________________
880415 Letter of Reprimand-Misconduct, operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (880220)(administrative).
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
RA 730531 760307 Honorable
RA 760308 820608 Honorable
RA 820609 860417 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. Evidence of record shows that the DA Selection Board, after comprehensive review of applicants OMPF, determined that he be barred from reenlistment. On 10 September 1987, the Dept. of the Army imposed a bar to reenlistment under The Qualitative Management Program (QMP) and advised him of his rights to appeal this decision. On 25 September 1987, the applicants commander notified him of the DA imposed bar to reenlistment, explained his available options, and counseled the applicant of his rights. The applicant acknowledged notification, consulted with counsel and stated that he would submit an appeal. On 29 June 1988, the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 16, AR 635-200, for HQDA imposed bar to reenlistment. The unit commander recommended approval. On 30 June 1988, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable.
b. On 15 July 1988, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 2 months, and 28 days of active military service in the period under review and had a total of 15 years, 1 month and 15 days of active military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 16 covers discharges caused by changes in service obligations. Paragraph 16-5 applies to personnel denied reenlistment and provides that soldiers who receive DA imposed or locally imposed bars to reenlistment, and who perceive that they will be unable to overcome the bar may apply for immediate discharge. Incident to the request the member must state that he understands that recoupment of unearned portions of any enlistment or reenlistment bonus is required and that later reenlistment is not permitted. Army policy states that the service of personnel separated under this paragraph will be characterized as honorable.
SECTION B-APPLICANTS SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicants DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020816.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 22 January 2003.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
b. Request: ( ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board noted the applicants contention that he should not have an RE code of 4 because he served for over 14 years without incident. However, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Chapter 16, Paragraph 5a, AR 635-200, by reason of a DA imposed bar to reenlistment. The applicant was properly notified as to the reasons of the DA imposed bar and was given the opportunity to appeal the bar prior to his separation. On 29 June 1988, the applicant voluntarily requested immediate separation after he determined that he was unable to overcome the bar to reenlistment. The applicant indicated that he understood that once separated, he would not be permitted to reenlist at a later date. This fact was stipulated in the separation documentation and acknowledged by the applicant. In accordance with AR 635-5-1, the applicant was appropriately assigned a separation designator code of KGF for a DA imposed bar to reenlistment and an RE Code of 4. An RE code of 4 means the applicant was discharged with a disqualification that cannot be waived and that he is not eligible for reenlistment. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. The Board being convinced that the reason for the discharge was both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.
b. Equity: The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of equity to change the discharge. The major factors upon which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III and IV of this decisional document.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
JOHN F. LONG
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2002079363 INDEX NUMBERS: A0101
Date of Review: 030122 A0113
Character of Service: HD A9500
Date of Discharge: 880715
Authority: AR 635-200 C16
Reason: A0720
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. Mbr X X
ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998014452
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): The Board noted the applicant’s personal statement submitted with his application; however, changing his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code is not within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024996
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999024996...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003093258
The evidence of record shows that the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Chapter 16, Paragraph 5, AR 635-200, by reason of a DA imposed bar to reenlistment. The Board being convinced that the reason for the discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999029188
The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | AR1999024100
The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued the applicant at discharge assigned a Separation Program Designator Code of KGF, and a Reentry (RE) code of 4, which were both proper and equitable at the time. During the review of this case the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) discovered that, although the applicant was properly and equitably discharged under regulatory guidance in effect at the time, the SPD and RE codes assigned the applicant are inequitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002066514
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048088
On 4 November 1989, the applicant acknowledged notification, consulted legal counsel and stated that he would submit an appeal. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2000048088 INDEX NUMBERS: A0720 Date of Review: 001106 A0500 Character of Service: HD A9445 Date of Discharge: 900928 A0100 Authority: AR 635-200 C16 Reason: A0400 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025854
Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Changing reentry (RE) codes is not within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. AR Number: 1999025854 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990602 A9211 Character of Service: HD A9219 Date of Discharge: 920430 A9445 Authority: AR 635-200 C16 A0100 Reason: A2400 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003087453
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 16-8, AR 635-200 by reason of reduction in force with an honorable characterization of service. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s available record of service and the evidence submitted by the applicant in support of his request for a change in his narrative reason for discharge. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms....
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999029128
The applicant’s request for separation was subsequently approved and the applicant was honorably discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999029128 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 000330...