PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 890213
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200
b. Reason: For The Good of The Service-In Lieu of Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
AAM
a. Period entered for: 4 Years (2 mos. ext) GCMDL
b. Entry date: 841023 (861208) ASR
c. Age: 19 Years DOB: 650817 OSR
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 87 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E4
4 Year(s) 1 Month(s) 23 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 880902-881028;
Mil conf 0
Civil conf 0
Other 0
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: The applicant has a Military Police Report in file dated (881029) and the creditable service differ from the DD Form 214, item 12© should be: 4 years, 1 month and 23 days.
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence of record shows that on 9 November 1988, the applicant was charged with AWOL from (880902-881028). On 9 November 1988, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veterans benefits. The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander and intermediate commanders recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 20 January 1989, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.
b. On 13 February 1989, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 4 years, 1 month, and 23 days of active military service and accrued 57 days of lost time in the period under review.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
SECTION B-APPLICANTS SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicants DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020528, with four (4) enclosure(s).
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( )Records review ( X ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 18 November 2002.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: 1 issue.
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service was too harsh.
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infraction of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offense. The Board found that the length and quality of the applicants service, and his post-service conduct, mitigated his misconduct. In view of the foregoing, the Board determined that the characterization of service was inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
(1) See Paragraph 3, below.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):
Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested, response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered.
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to under .
( ) Equitable.
( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to Honorable.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 5 0
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 22 November 2002
The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s):
( X ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable.
( X ) Other (see remarks below).
Remarks: Restore grade to specialist/E-4.
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
JOHN F. LONG
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2002074192 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 021118 A9218
Character of Service: UD A9222
Date of Discharge: 890213 A0100
Authority: AR 635-200 C10
Reason: A7100
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 3-2 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. Mbr X X
ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700517
890719: Applicant was discharged.2. The Army Discharge Review Board cannot change your reenlistment code. CASE NO: AD97-00517 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.
ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700441
CASE NO: AD97-00441 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Voting record: ChangeNo Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 0 5 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below.
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000039673
The applicant acknowledged notification, consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, declined consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon his receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general discharge. ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct, Chapter 14, AR 635-200. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999027470
PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999027470 INDEX NUMBERS: A9235 Date of Review: 990728 A9217 Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001057049
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035815
Evidence of record shows that on 8 February 1989, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested a hearing by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. PART VII -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001052374
On 17 July 1997, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 18 July 1997, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048379
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Misconduct, AR 635-200 . EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084757
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The Board found that the applicant’s misconduct was mitigated by the time that has elapsed since the applicant’s discharge, the minor nature of the offenses, and his post service accomplishments. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000045597
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:WILSON A. SHATZER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application...