PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Honorable
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 890612
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 8, NGR 600-200
b. Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
ASR
a. Period entered for: 8 Years
b. Entry date: 870224
c. Age: 17 Years DOB: 691219
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 95 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E3
2 Year(s) 3 Month(s) 19 Day(s)
4. Performance evaluations:
NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
Date Offense(s)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
ADT 870616 871020 Uncharacterized
(Concurrent service)
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYSTS ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicants discharge from the Arizona Army National Guard and transfer to the USAR Control Group are not a matter of record. However, the applicants record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). Her NGB Form 22 indicates that she was discharged on 12 June 1989 from ARNGUS under the provisions of Chapter 8, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of honorable and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training).
b. On 12 June 1989, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 3 months, and 19 days of active military service in the period under review.
c. The applicants record also contains State of Arizona, Department of Emergency and Military Affairs, Division of Military Affairs (Army), Office of the Adjutant General, Phoenix, Arizona, Orders 158-22, discharging the applicant from the Army National Guard under the provisions Chapter 8, NGR 600-200, and assigned her to USAR Control Group (Annual Training) ARPERCEN, St Louis, MO, effective 12 June 1989 with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army Reserve National Guard. Paragraph 8-27(g) of that regulation provides in pertinent part that individuals can be separated for being an unsatisfactory participant. Army Regulation 135-91 states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1 year period.
SECTION B-APPLICANTS SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicants DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020116, with four (4) enclosure(s).
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 13 March 2002.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the available records for the period of enlistment under review. The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicants discharge are not a matter of record. The Board noted the applicants contentions; however, said contentions are not supported by the evidence of record and the applicant has provided no independent corroborating evidence in support of her contentions. The applicants record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) reflecting an honorable discharge and an order discharging the applicant from the Arizona Army National Guard with a general discharge and assigning her to the USAR Control Group. Notwithstanding discrepancies in the aforementioned documents, it is the policy of the Board not to downgrade a discharge under review. Accordingly, the Board determined from the evidence available that the applicant was properly discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with an Honorable characterization of service. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to .
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to _________ under ____________________________.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
GERARD W. SCHWARTZ
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
EARNEST C. SMITH, JR.
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2002067598 INDEX NUMBERS: A9411
Date of Review: 020313 A9217
Character of Service: HD A0113
Date of Discharge: 890612
Authority: NGR 600-200 C8
Reason: A8400
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000040584
The applicant’s record also contains an NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), which indicates, that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-27g, NGR 600-200 by reason of unsatisfactory participation with an honorable characterization of service. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003095524
However, the Board directs that the applicant’s discharge order from the Reserve of the Army, issued by the State of Arizona, be changed to reflect a characterization of service of honorable. Remarks: This action entails a change to the applicant’s discharge from the Reserve of the Army to reflect an Honorable characterization of service. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 99032309
His NGB Form 22 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200 by reason of misconduct-unsatisfactory participant with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions discharge. The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003087591
His NGB Form 22 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8-27g, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 1 May 1990, the applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION...
ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999027476
Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MRS. WADE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000049587
The evidence of record shows that on 3 May 1993, the unit commander requested that the applicant be discharged from the Virginia Army National Guard effecting the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of Chapter 8, NGR 600-200 by reason of unsatisfactory participation. On 21 May 1993, the applicant was discharged. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001058314
His NGB Form 22 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, NGR 600-200 by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was separated from the Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) after more than 9 years of service under the provisions of Chapter 8-27g, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000050820
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 000815. In view of the above, the PAARNG is requested to change the applicant’s NGB Form 22A (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to reflect that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 8-27f, by reason of unsatisfactory participation. In view of the above, the PAARNG is requested to change the applicant’s NGB Form 22A (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to reflect that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003098586
The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8- 27g, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3.” In the absence of information to the contrary, the Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001059060
The Board noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B -...