Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700294
Original file (199700294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                                    CASE NO: AD97-00294
PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 960424

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200

         b. Reason:       Misconduct
4. Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:

a. Period entered for: 5 Years Type
b. Entry date: 920903 GCMDL
c. Age: 18 Years DOB: 740602 NDSM
d. Educational level: HS Grad ASR
e. Aptitude area scores: ( X ) NIF/NA
          GT: 105 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Actual creditable service: 3 Years
7 Months 19 Days Grade
E4

4. Performance evaluations:
( X ) NONE

                                             CASE NO: AD97-00294
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence:

Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL 950103 - 950105
         Mil conf
         Civil conf
         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment:

         Nature Date
         Art 15 960212
 Art 15 950412 (Summarized)
Art 15 950117
7. Court-Martial data: ( X ) NONE
         

8.       Remarks: ( X ) NONE
SECTION B - Other Service Data

 1. Other discharge(s): ( X ) NONE

        





         CASE NO: AD97-00294
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A - Analyst's Assessment

1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge:

960401: Unit Commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation
action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct-          pattern of misconduct. He was advised of his rights.
 960405: Separation authority waived rehabilitation and approved separation
with a general under honorable conditions discharge.
960424: Applicant was discharged.
         

2. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity on DD Form 293 or incorporated by reference:
         See attached DD Form 293.

 3. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 961106.



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION B - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
( X ) NONE
PART V - SUMMARY OF REVIEW HEARING


         a. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

        
         b. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: ( X ) NONE

                                    CASE NO: AD97-00294
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
        

b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
        
         b. Equity:       The parenthetical numbers below corresponds to the issue numbers on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.
(1, 2, 3, 4) The issues are rejected. Eligibility for veteran's benefits does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. The applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for assistance on this matter. The Army Discharge Review Board cannot change your reenlistment code. To obtain a change in an RE code, the applicant should send a letter with supporting documentation directly to: Commander, US Army PERSCOM, ATTN: TAPC-EPR-P, 2461 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22331-0450. To obtain a waiver for reenlistment, the applicant should contact a local Army recruiter for assistance. The Board found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

3. Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA

                            CASE NO: AD97-00294
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .
         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                        
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .

2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: CPCD
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: ( X ) NA

                                     CASE NO: AD97-00294
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       


                                 
LTC PHILLIPS
Post Hearing Reviewer   


PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
(X) NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION


Approval Authority:

EL CARTIO BARNES
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SHERRY HILL SARGENT
Major, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AD9700294 970328 GD 960424 AR635-200 C14 A6700 NC 5-0 A
1 10 11 12 18 20 26 41 46 49 52

A9217 A0100 A9411 A9445
53 58 63 68

                           CASE NO: AD97-00294
PART IX - VOTING RECORD

 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1. MAJ WYRICK, JIMMY Mbr      X           X    

2. LTC SMITH, LILLIAN Mbr      X          X    

3. LTC WHISKER, JILL Mbr      X          X    

4. COL MELCHIOR, ROBERT Mbr      X          X    

5. COL MATHEWS, WILLIAM PO      X          X    






Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701385

    Original file (199701385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-01385 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701608

    Original file (199701608.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-01608 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. CASE NO: AD97-01608 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700618

    Original file (199700618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00618 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-00618 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC WHISKER Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (NONE) ECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board CASE NO: AD97-00618 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700782

    Original file (199700782.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. Voting record: ChangeNo Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 0 5 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. CASE NO: AD97-00782 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL ALLEN Post...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700734

    Original file (199700734.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00734 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-00734 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL ALLEN Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board CASE NO: AD97-00734 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700378

    Original file (199700378.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. 920527: Applicant was discharged. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700280

    Original file (199700280.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. CASE NO: AD97-00280 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700657

    Original file (199700657.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    930419: Applicant was discharged. The evidence of record shows that the command attempted to assist the applicant in performing and conducting to Army standards by providing counseling and even by imposition of nonjudicial punishment. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700736

    Original file (199700736.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. CASE NO: AD97-00736 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700520

    Original file (199700520.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. The Board, being convinced that the characterization of service and reason for discharge were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. CASE NO: AD97-00520 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.