Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010082
Original file (20150010082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  16 July 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150010082 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant also states, that his diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was not rated with other service connected injuries during the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).  He further states, that he was advised to accept the MEB and PTSD will be granted by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). 

4.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination.

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The evidence of the available records showed a diagnosis of anxiety/adjustment disorder was rendered during the DES process.  The anxiety/adjustment diagnosis was not forwarded by the MEB or adjudicated by the Physical Evaluation Board.  Therefore, the SRP determined that the applicant met the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP next considered whether any mental condition, regardless of diagnosis, was unfitting for continued military service.  The commander’s statement did not implicate a MH condition as a cause of duty impairment.  At no time during the applicant’s military service did he require a psychiatric hospitalization or emergency care.  The SRP therefore concluded that there was insufficient evidence that any MH condition rose to the level of being unfitting at the time of separation.

4.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.









BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20150010082



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010690

    Original file (20140010690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010712

    Original file (20140010712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. In the service treatment record notes and at the VA C&P MH exam the applicant reported his main stressor during deployment was separation from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004230

    Original file (20140004230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the physical evaluation board (PEB)’s determination that an adjustment disorder was the correct diagnosis and that it was not compensable; and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018417

    Original file (20140018417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009050

    Original file (20140009050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military disability evaluation system (DES). The SRP concluded the diagnosis of adjustment disorder at the time of the MEB and PEB was correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014269

    Original file (20140014269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. Its first assessment, under MH Review Project guidelines, was to judge whether a ratable MH diagnosis (either PTSD or anxiety disorder) was unfairly eliminated during DES proceedings. The SRP next considered whether there was preponderance of performance-based evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016107

    Original file (20140016107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP noted the PTSD diagnosis was listed on the physical examination for the medical evaluation board (MEB) (DD Form 2808) without recorded PTSD symptoms.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014546

    Original file (20140014546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in a diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). However, the PTSD diagnosis was not considered by the physical evaluation board (PEB) and, therefore, an MH diagnosis was eliminated to the applicant’s possible disadvantage during that process. The SRP noted the VA examination recorded the applicant’s report of symptoms that were inconsistent with the treatment record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005781

    Original file (20140005781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010919

    Original file (20140010919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. The evidence did not support a change in the diagnosis.