Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008680
Original file (20150008680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150008680 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. 

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing disability evaluation processing between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability processing.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination.

2.  The SRP carefully considered all available evidence.  The applicant’s MH diagnoses were not changed to the applicant’s possible disadvantage during the Disability Evaluation System process.  Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP then considered the appropriateness of the MH diagnoses, and concluded that the MH diagnoses were appropriate.  The applicant exhibited some features of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but did not meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD.  The SRP then considered the appropriateness of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination.  Anxiety disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) and insomnia were adjudicated by the PEB as not unfitting. 

4.  The SRP main charge with respect to these two MH conditions is to assess the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication.  The SRP noted that these MH conditions were not profiled and neither of the conditions was specified as failing retention standards.  There was no indication from the record that these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance.  After due deliberation, and in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination. 

5.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.









BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      _______ _   x_  ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20150008680



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011248

    Original file (20140011248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also considered if the diagnosis should be changed. The SRP determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to support a change in the diagnosis.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003242

    Original file (20140003242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011252

    Original file (20140011252 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP by majority vote recommends that the applicant's prior separation be modified to reflect a Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) rating of 50 percent, in accordance with of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011252

    Original file (20140011252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP by majority vote recommends that the applicant's prior separation be modified to reflect a Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) rating of 50 percent, in accordance with of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014487

    Original file (20140014487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted the applicant's MH condition was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB. Based on the post-separation VA evidence and the STR, the SRP was unable to conclude that there was either sufficient evidence to change the Service MH diagnosis or a preponderance of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010849

    Original file (20140010849.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP’s charge with respect to MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the PEB is an assessment of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010846

    Original file (20140010846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the pilot Disability Evaluation System (DES).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006925

    Original file (20140006925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy. The SRP also noted the VA carried a working diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and this was the diagnosis made by the VA Compensation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010492

    Original file (20140010492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, and the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination. To consider if this diagnostic variance represented a possible disadvantage to the applicant during the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) process, the SRP first considered if the preponderance of the evidence indicated unfitness to perform military duties. The record indicated treatment was improving his symptoms and his symptoms were not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010890

    Original file (20140010890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination, whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable, and whether a...