IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 28 July 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150007884
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests reimbursement for a personally procured move (PPM) [also known as a Do-It-Yourself (DITY) move] he made from Fort Bragg, NC to Arlington, VA.
2. The applicant states:
a. He is requesting reimbursement for his family's PPM because the Army would have had to pay for a permanent change of station (PCS) move in any case.
b. He saved the Army time and money by conducting a PPM move and he is only asking for reimbursement. He understands that he conducted the move without PCS orders; however, they conducted the move in the best interest of his family, his spouse's career enhancement, and their children's educational well-being.
c. In February 2013, he received PCS orders from the Pentagon, Washington DC to Fort Bragg, NC, for battalion command. His wife, at this point, had worked for the Arlington Public Schools for 2 years as an elementary school teacher. In August 2013, after moving to Fort Bragg, his wife received a job offer from the Arlington Public School District as an elementary school teacher (her old job).
d. After speaking to his commander and the Army's Engineer Branch, everyone understood his family situation and they were in favor of assigning him back to the National Capital Region upon completion of battalion command.
e. In December 2013, he used his own funds (approximately $5,000) to move his household goods (HHG) to Arlington, VA. He continued to live and work at Fort Bragg, NC. In February 2015, he received PCS orders to the Pentagon. He attended the Fort Bragg PPM briefing and he informed them of his situation.
f. He submitted all the PPM receipts (weight tickets, truck and equipment rental, moving crew, and fuel) for an exception to policy (ETP) for reimbursement. In March 2015, the Fort Bragg Transportation Office informed him that they, and the Department of the Army G-4 had denied his ETP request and refused to reimburse him for the PPM.
3. The applicant provides:
* PPM Checklist and Expense Certification
* DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher)
* DD Form 2278 (Application for DITY Move and Counseling Checklist)
* truck rental contract and receipt
* moving company and moving supplies receipts
* weight ticket
* fuel receipt
* memorandum, from the Fort Bragg Logistics Readiness Center, Transportation Manager
* email from Headquarters Department of the Army (HQDA), G-4
* PCS orders
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the rank of lieutenant colonel.
2. Orders 051-41, dated 26 February 2013, directed his PCS from the Pentagon, Washington, DC to Fort Bragg, NC with a report date of 4 March 2013.
3. He provided a truck rental contract and receipt, moving company and moving supplies receipts, a weight ticket, and a fuel receipt that show he executed a move from Fayetteville, NC to Arlington, VA in December 2013.
4. Orders 035-21, dated 4 February 2015, directed his PCS from Fort Bragg, NC, back to the Pentagon with a report date of 1 April 2015.
5. He provided a PPM Checklist and Expense Certification, DD Form 1351-2, and a DD Form 2278 showing he submitted a claim for payment in the amount of $1,942.64 as reimbursement for his PPM executed in December 2013.
6. By memorandum, dated 18 March 2015, the Transportation Manager, Fort Bragg Logistics Readiness Center, informed the applicant that his request for an ETP for payment of his PPM was disapproved by HQDA G-4. The denial was based on the provisions of the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR), paragraph 5208-E (HHG Transportation Before an Order is Issued), which pointed out 14 months between the PPM and the publication of the orders is not a relatively short time. In addition, no supporting documentation from the orders issuing authority was presented indicating that prior to making the decision to move he coordinated with the military personnel office or transportation.
7. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from HQDA, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, Transportation Policy Division. This office recommends denial of the applicants request and cited the JTR, paragraph 5208-E, as the basis for their recommendation.
8. The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant to afford him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal. No response was received.
9. The JTR, chapter 2 (Official Travel), part B (Travel Orders), states:
A travel order is a document, issued and approved by the Secretarial Process, directing travel to/from/between designated points and serving as the basis for reimbursement by the Government of official travel, transportation, and reimbursable expenses. An order should be issued before travel is performed. Travel reimbursement is not authorized when travel is performed before receipt of a written or oral order. Expenses incurred before receipt of a written or oral orders are not reimbursable.
10. The JTR, chapter 2, part B also states that an urgent or unusual situation may require that official travel begin or be performed before a written order can be issued. Under these circumstances an oral order conveyed by any medium, including telephone, may be given. When this occurs, the authorizing officer must promptly issue a confirmatory written order. An oral order meets the requirement for a written order when it is given in advance of travel, subsequently confirmed in writing giving the date of the oral order, and approved by competent authority.
11. The JTR, paragraph 5208-E, provides that HHG transportation before a PCS order is issued is authorized if the request for transportation is supported by a:
a. Statement from the approving official/designated representative that the member was advised before such an order was issued that it would be issued;
b. Applicant-signed written agreement to pay any additional costs incurred for transportation to another point required because the new permanent duty station named in the order is different than that named in the statement;
c. Written applicant-signed agreement to pay the entire transportation cost if a PCS order is not later issued to authorize the transportation.
d. The length of time before the PCS order is issued, during which a member may be advised that an order is to be issued, may not exceed the relatively short period between the time when a determination is made to order the member to make a PCS and the date on which the order is actually issued;
e. General information furnished to the member concerning order issuance before the determination is made to actually issue the order (such as time of eventual release from active duty, time of service term expiration, eligibility date for retirement, expected rotation date from outside continental U.S. duty) is not advice that the order is to be issued.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence shows the applicant executed a PPM from Fayetteville, NC to Arlington, VA prior to receipt of PCS orders. The evidence also shows that his decision to execute the PPM prior to receiving PCS orders was based on his spouses employment.
2. The provisions in the JTR are very clear in that expenses incurred before receipt of written or oral orders are not reimbursable, unless the move is mission essential or an urgent or unusual situation required the PPM prior to issuance of orders. There is no such evidence in this case.
3. In view of the foregoing, the requested relief should not be granted.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150007884
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150007884
5
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005033
The applicant provides: * Orders Number BL-119-0004, dated 29 April 2010 * U-Haul Contract, dated 23 May 2011 * Montana Vehicle Registration receipt and statement, dated 12 November 2010 * Texas Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), Registration Renewal receipt, dated 1 December 2010 * Orders Number 167-62, dated 16 June 2011 * Orders Number 168-59, dated 17 June 2011 * Morale, Welfare, and Recreation (MWR) Auto Crafts Repair Center receipt, dated 24 June 2011 * Credit card statement, dated 1...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006637
The applicant requests reimbursement for his personally procured move (PPM) move from Fort Huachuca, AZ, to Fort Campbell, KY. 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving at Fort Huachuca when he was issued PCS orders in December 2014 reassigning him to Fort Campbell. On 19 December 2014, he was properly counseled at Fort Huachuca on the PPM program to include his entitlements, his responsibilities, and the documentation required to submit a claim for a PPM move.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011490
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, payment for a personally procured move (PPM), formerly known as a do-it-yourself (DITY) move, he made from Fort Campbell, Kentucky to Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado. Travel reimbursement is not authorized when the travel is performed before receipt of written or oral orders.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026758
The applicant requests, in effect, reimbursement for the personally-procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG), based on 95 percent (%) of the Government Constructed Cost (GCC) and in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), and that the estimated gross incentive (95% reimbursement estimate) cited on his DD Form 2278 (Application for Do It Yourself (DITY) Move and Counseling Checklist), dated 25 January 2010, be used instead of the estimated gross incentive cited on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014370
The applicant states: * when he turned in his PPM paperwork, he did not turn in the empty weight ticket for one of the two trucks he used to complete his PPM * he had the appropriate weight tickets for the truck he rented to move his professional gear, but not for the truck he rented as his main moving truck, which he used to move his HHG * neither he nor the transportation official who reviewed his case prior to submission realized the error * instead of calling and requesting the empty...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020109
The applicant requests payment for the portion his household goods (HHG) moved by personal vehicle during his do-it-yourself (DITY) move in 2011. The printout also shows payment for a hotel reservation in New Mexico was authorized on 23 April 2011 and two other payments categorized by merchant type "Travel Agencies & Tour Operators" were authorized on 20 and 24 April 2011. g. A memorandum for record, dated 27 April 2011, signed by his commander states he was aware the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006328
The applicant states: * as directed by permanent change of station (PCS) orders, he was required to move from Fort Carson to Fort Leonard Wood * he requested a PPM instead of having the government move his household goods (HHG) * as a requirement for claiming travel expenses, he had his moving truck weighed full near Kansas City, MO * at one point during his family's travels to Fort Leonard Wood, he stopped to assist his wife with the care of their then 3-month old daughter * while assisting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026099
The member rents normal types of rental vehicles, equipment, moving aids, and packing material and the member performs all labor for the move. The evidence of record shows the applicant was authorized to perform a PPM from Fort Richardson to Fort Carson. It is reasonable to presume that had the applicant actually performed the move himself, without the aid of ABF, there would not have been an issue with his claim and he would have been entitled to the advance payment, as well as his full...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009422
The applicant states: * he exhausted all measures to work with the installation transportation section, his branch, and/or human resources division to avoid having to conduct a do-it-yourself (DITY) move (now called PPM) prior to receiving his PCS orders (2 weeks early) * he recently transferred from Fort Leonard Wood, MO, to Columbia, MO, to attend Advanced Civil Schooling (ACS) * since this was not a typical assignment, his branch was unable to get his PCS orders in a timely manner *...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00423
His PCS order was issued on 10 August 2012. When he attempted to file his paperwork with the TMO he was told that he was not entitled, as the shipment was made prior to issuance of the PCS order. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that competent authority issued a Letter-in-Lieu of order dated 20 July 2012, and the applicant...