IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150004956
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests the removal of two documents from his official military personnel file (OMPF), specifically a Certificate of Training for completing Expert Field Medical Badge (EFMB) standardization training from 4 May through 15 May 2013, and a Certificate of Achievement for earning the EFMB, dated 15 May 2013.
2. The applicant states his social security number (SSN) is incorrectly shown on these two documents.
3. The applicant provides a copy of the Certificate of Training and Certificate of Achievement.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, as a second lieutenant in the Medical Service Corps, on 12 August 2011. He executed DA Forms 71 (Oath of Office Military Personnel) on 12 August 2011, as a Reserve commissioned officer and on 6 October 2011, as a Regular commissioned officer.
2. He was promoted to first lieutenant, effective 6 April 2013.
3. His OMPF contains both of the subject certificates; however, both certificates display his correct SSN. Versions of these certificates displaying an incorrect SSN were not found in his OMPF.
4. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Army Military Human Resource Records Management) governs the composition of the OMPF and states the performance folder is used for filing performance, commendatory, and disciplinary data. Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file. The document will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by certain agencies, to include this Board.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
The applicant's OMPF contains both of the subject certificates; however, both certificates display his correct SSN. Versions of these certificates displaying an incorrect SSN were not found in his OMPF. Therefore, there is neither an error nor injustice and there is no basis for granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___ x____ ___x____ ___x ____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____________x____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100024747
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150004956
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013493
The applicant provides; * DA Form 638, dated 20 February 2008 * two memoranda, dated 13 December 2005 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. c. DA Form 638, dated 20 February 2008, shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for the period 14 April 2007 to 25 June 2008 by Permanent Order Number 078-01, dated 18 March 2008 and his SSN was listed as xxx-xx-3114 in block 6. The evidence of record shows the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000031
This DA Form 1506 does not show she entered active duty on 8 July 2012. c. The DA Form 1506 she digitally signed on 26 September 2014, which was also authenticated by an HR Technician on 26 September 2014 documents her various periods of service and differentiates each period as Army service in either the ARNG, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) or Regular components. Her OMPF contains 2 DA Forms 1506 that were completed in 2013 and 2014. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002906
The applicant requests, in effect, that a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) for the period 9 May 2014 to 22 May 2014 (hereafter referred to as the contested DA Form 1059) be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Both the "marginal" and "achieved course standards" DA Forms 1059 are in his record. His record contains a second DA Form 1059 for the RC-MICCC Phase 2, dated 22 May 2014, showing he achieved course standards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004736
The applicant states, in effect, the battalion commander imposed nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ; however, he does not believe the evidence supported the findings and there was insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, as provided for in Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice). (2) Paragraph 5, subparagraph b, in pertinent part, "It is the Unit commander's responsibility to conduct EFMB training and preparation in advance of EFMB Testing." (1) Recommend...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067903C070402
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS : That her award of the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) be changed to the Expert Field Medical Badge (EFMB) on her enlisted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). APPLICANT STATES : That she was never awarded the EIB but was awarded the EFMB. The opinion further...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021703
The applicant requests the following: * removal of the DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) for the period 1 August 2011 through 31 July 2012 (hereafter referred to as the contested OER) from his official military personnel file (OMPF) * deletion of the administrative elimination action initiated by the Commanding General (CG), U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * amendment of the whistleblower Inspector General (IG) complaint filed on 26 September 2012 * restoration of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068891C070402
The correct name of the board to which the applicant refers is the US Army Reserve Command Board (USARC) Colonel Command Assignment Selection Board (CCASB). The USARC CCASB, currently governed by USARC Regulation 140-5, Army Reserve Colonel and Lieutenant Colonel Command Assignment Selection Board Program, revised 1 July 2000, convenes twice a year. He submitted the necessary documents and was later informed that he had an integrity issue concerning his awards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002368
He provides: * his Enlisted Record Brief * a DA Form 1059 showing he "achieved course standards" * a DA Form 1059 showing he "exceeded course standards" * a self-authored memorandum to the Board * an Army Medical Department (AMEDD) NCO Academy memorandum, subject: Commandant's List * a recognition ceremony announcement containing a Commandant's List for BNCOC Class 001-06 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001245
The applicant states, in effect: * his appeal is based on substantive error; it has already been reviewed by the Enlisted Special Review Board (ESRB) * he is providing additional information not considered by the ESRB which includes: * Individual Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) for the period July 2011 through June 2012 showing no participation with the rating unit other than the period 19 February 2012 to 25 February 2012 * Retirement Points Detail for the period January 2011 through...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009925
Counsel requests, in effect: a. correction of Part VII (Senior Rater) of three Officer Evaluation Reports (OER) covering the periods 3 June 1996 through 2 June 1997; 3 June 1997 through 2 June 1998; and 3 June 1998 through 2 June 1999 to show "Above Center of Mass" instead of "Center of Mass," or, the OERs be removed from the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). e. The three OERs issued to the applicant during his time in command of the 351st Ordnance Company should be...