Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003554
Original file (20150003554.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  13 October 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150003554 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Superior Unit Award.

2.  The applicant states he was in the 1st Battalion, 81st Field Artillery, 56th Field Artillery Brigade, when it was awarded the Army Superior Unit Award for service during the Pershing 2 Missile System fielding.  He was assigned between November 1983 to November 1985 and the period for the award was from November 1983 through December 1985.

3.  The applicant provides Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) 9, 1987 and DAGO 30, 1987.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's records for his period of active duty are not currently accessible. His DD Form 214 and service records for his period of service with the Army National Guard (ARNG), which followed his active service, are available and provide sufficient evidence for consideration of the applicant's request.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 August 1983.  

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 1 June 1987.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years and 10 months of net active creditable service. It does not show the award of the Army Superior Unit Award.

5.  In his ARNG service record is a certificate of achievement, dated 28 January 1985, which notes his unit of assignment as 1st Battalion, 81st Field Artillery Regiment, 56th Field Artillery Brigade.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes policies and procedures for military awards.  The Army Superior Unit Award was established by the Secretary of the Army on 8 April 1985 (DAGO 1990–15) to recognize outstanding meritorious performance by a unit during peacetime of a difficult and challenging mission under extraordinary circumstances.

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 670-1 (Guide to the Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia) states unit awards can be worn permanently only when the Soldier was assigned to, and present for duty with the unit any time during the period cited in the award citation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

To be authorized permanent wear of the Army Superior Unit Award, the recipient must have been assigned and present for duty at any time during the cited period.  A certificate of achievement verifies the applicant was assigned to the unit.  The fact he received a certificate of achievement suggests he was properly present for duty.  The evidence is sufficient to support the granting of the applicant's request.


BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x___  ___x____   GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 June 1987 to show the Army Superior Unit Award.



      __________x_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003554





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003554



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011965

    Original file (20100011965.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100011965 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Evidence shows the applicant was assigned to 3rd Battalion, 84th Field Artillery during the period his unit was awarded the Army Superior Unit Award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Superior Unit Award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002332C070206

    Original file (20050002332C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show the Army Superior Unit Citation (correctly known as the Army Superior Unit Award). There are no orders in the applicant’s available military records nor did the applicant provide any evidence that her unit received or was entitled to the Army Superior Unit Award. Additionally, according to the Internet website, the 56th Field Artillery Command received this award in 1987, after the applicant was discharged and there is no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003264

    Original file (20140003264.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) * Humanitarian Service Medal * Arkansas Emergency Service Ribbon * Army Superior Unit Award * Additional Skill Identifier (ASI) C (recruiter) 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following awards: a. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * Army Achievement Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016635

    Original file (20090016635.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) be added to his record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Therefore, the applicant is entitled to permanent award of the ASUA and correction of his records to show this award. Evidence shows the applicant received three Army Achievement Medals during his tenure on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000520

    Original file (20090000520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the USAFS-Berlin was ever awarded the MUC. Therefore, he is entitled to wear the ASUA and to have this unit award added to his records at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 January 1987 the ASUA and to show he is eligible to wear two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018991

    Original file (20090018991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, through his United States Senator: * That his name be "cleared of the slander and libel stating that I was AWOL [absent without leave]" * That his rank be adjusted to something higher, such as lieutenant colonel * That his student loans be repaid * That his retirement points be updated * That he receive a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for his Reserve Army Nurse Corps service 2. The applicant enlisted in the Pennsylvania Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065542C070421

    Original file (2001065542C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion to major but that the computer at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) does not show that he has completed the Infantry Officer Advanced Course, so he has not been considered for promotion. On 8 January 1986, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) responded to a request from the applicant, case number AC 85-00251, to correct his commissioning as a USAR officer from 23 August 1983...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008449C070206

    Original file (20050008449C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 October 1983, the battalion commander forwarded the applicant's signed statement to The Adjutant General of Connecticut stating the applicant declined promotion with continued assignment to the Army National Guard of the United States in present grade as no vacancy presently existed for him to accept promotion in the higher grade. The applicant was informed that, since the records showed he had declined promotion to major [while in the ARNG], his promotion to major [once transferred to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001745

    Original file (20140001745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. he completed Airborne training; b. he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Combat Patch for service during mission Urgent Fury in Grenada, six awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and awards of the Humanitarian Service Medal (HSM) for service in Grenada in 1983 and for security operations in Fort Indiantown Gap, PA during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021278

    Original file (20140021278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged in the rank/grade of private/E-1 as a result of court-martial in accordance with Special Court-Martial Order Number 31, dated 21 May 1987 [and Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel)], with a bad conduct discharge. However, for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and who are being separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable," the following statement will appear as...