Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003279
Original file (20150003279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:    

		BOARD DATE:  8 October 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150003279 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The applicant states he was told by a processing officer that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal; but he never received the award.  He would like the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records (ABCMR) to conduct an investigation to determine whether or not the processing officer was correct.  If the processing officer's statement is found to be true, he should receive the Bronze Star Medal.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the ABCMR to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in to the Army of the United States on 
5 December 1968, but appears to have subsequently enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 December 1968.  He held military occupational specialty 52D (Power Generator Equipment Repairman) and attained the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5.  

3.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not list the Bronze Star Medal.  

4.  His records do not contain a recommendation for award of the Bronze Star Medal or orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.

5.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System – an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 and maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch – failed to reveal orders that awarded him the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  The applicant was released from active duty on 13 September 1971.  His    DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 3-14, states the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service not involving participation in aerial flight in connection with military operations against an armed enemy or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

8.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.  Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award.

9.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to:  Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), ATTN:  AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122.  The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence in the applicant's available record that shows he was awarded or recommended for the Bronze Star Medal.  The governing Army regulation states that for personal decorations, including the Bronze Star Medal, formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command and announcement of orders are required.  However, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the Bronze Star Medal by submitting a request to HRC through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003279





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003279



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010976

    Original file (20140010976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. the following awards and their addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); * Silver Star * Bronze Star Medal with V Device * Purple Heart * Air Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge b. and that he be provided a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214). He is submitting evidence/documents from his former chain of command and platoon members for the recommendations and testimony for him to be awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002475

    Original file (20130002475.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the Bronze Star Medal and he should have been awarded the Silver Star for action in combat on or about 8 September 1944. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. However, in the absence of official orders, there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal or correct his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006160

    Original file (20140006160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded by shrapnel in combat in Vietnam. In order to request an award under Title 10 USC 1130, the applicant must submit a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award). Item 40 (Wounds) of his contemporaneous DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002931

    Original file (20140002931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious service. There is insufficient evidence to support the applicant's contention regarding the Bronze Star Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017943

    Original file (20140017943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant has submitted a request to the Army Decorations Board, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) and was denied relief. d. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214, and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the following awards: * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013284

    Original file (20130013284.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon this application, the evidence of record, and accompanying supporting documents submitted by the applicant, and a review of historical records pertaining to the FSM, it does not appear that the FSM was recommended for or awarded the Silver Star. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant does not provide substantiating evidence that shows the FSM was recommended for or awarded the Silver Star. However, in the absence of official orders, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014498

    Original file (20110014498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, they required official documentation, such as general orders assigning him personally to flying duties in Vietnam, DA Form 759-1 (Individual Flight Record and Individual Flight Certificate-Army), or USARV Form 131-R (Awards and Qualification Record) (Air Medal). Without copies of his flight records they could not award him the Air Medal. As he was previously advised by HRC, Awards and Decorations Branch, he must provide documentation, to include general orders assigning him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010937

    Original file (20080010937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of page (1) of his DA 638, initiated on 8 September 2004, from the Commander of the 1058th AEF TC, recommending the applicant for award of the ARCOM with "V" Device. He was informed that there was insufficient documentation to forward the applicant's recommendation for award to the Army Decorations Board for consideration. As noted by the Military Awards Branch, HRC-Alexandria, without page 2 of the DA Form 638, his request could not be processed as a lost...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012900

    Original file (20080012900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 November 2007, the Military Awards Branch, HRC-Alexandria, advised the applicant's Congressman that without the required documentation, it was unable to determine whether the recommendation was submitted into military channels within the 2-year time requirement and it could not be processed as a lost award. Although the applicant was able to provide a copy of page 1 of his DA Form 638 and proposed citation, page 2 which shows the chain of command endorsements are missing. As noted by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012910

    Original file (20080012910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was informed that there was insufficient documentation to forward the applicant's recommendation for award to the Army Decorations Board for consideration. It advised him that without the required documentation, it was unable to determine whether the recommendation was submitted into military channels within the 2-year time requirement and it could not be processed as a lost award. As noted by the Military Awards Branch, HRC-Alexandria, without page 2 of the DA Form 638, his request...