Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002057
Original file (20150002057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150002057 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device.

2.  The applicant states this award should be added to his DD Form 214.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214 and BSM with "V" Device orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His records are not available to the Board for review.  However, there were sufficient documents available in the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. 

Army Human Resources Command, to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  On 11 July 1967, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

4.  A review of ADCARS found Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, issued:

   a.  General Orders Number 6194, dated 30 July 1968, which awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for his heroism in connection with military operations against an armed hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam on 9 May 1968; and

   b.  General Orders Number 10535, dated 9 November 1968, which awarded him the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service while assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 47th Infantry, Vietnam, from December 1967 to November 1968.

5.  On 10 July 1969, he was released from active duty in the rank of sergeant/E-5 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* Vietnam Service Medal with silver service star
* National Defense Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* 2nd Class Gunner Badge (M-60)
* Vietnam Unit Citation
* Army Commendation Medal
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bars (M-14 and M-16)

6.  A review of his record indicates he may be eligible for additional awards not shown on his DD Form 214.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of 


the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 47th Infantry, was cited for award of the:

	a.  Valorous Unit Award for 31 January 1968, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) 5, dated 1969, and for the period 6 to 12 May 1968, by DAGO 43, dated 1970;

	b.  Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, by DAGO 
31, dated 1969, for the period 1 December 1966 to 30 June 1968, and by DAGO 13, dated 1969, for the period 1 July to 13 November 1968; and

   c.  Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, by DAGO 59, dated 1969, for the period 19 December 1966 to 28 June 1969.

9.  DA Pamphlet 672-3, paragraph 6 (Miscellaneous Information) states that not more than one award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation may be worn by any individual.  Although wear of multiple awards of this unit citation badge is not authorized, official military personnel and historical records will indicate all awards received.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device.

2.  Orders awarded him the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  He was promoted to sergeant/E-5 and received a valor award while serving in Vietnam.  In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 11 July 1967 to 10 July 1969 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

4.  He served in the 2nd Battalion, 47th Infantry, in Vietnam during a period for which the unit was cited for two Valorous Unit Awards, two Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citations (one of which is shown on his DD Form 214 as “Vietnam Unit Citation”), and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor 

Medal First Class Unit Citation.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards.

5.  The applicant should note that although his unit was awarded two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, only one award is authorized for wear on his military uniform.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 11 July 1967 to 10 July 1969;

	b.  deleting the Vietnam Unit Citation from his DD Form 214; and

	c.  adding the following awards to his DD Form 214:

* Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Valorous Unit Award (2nd Award)
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award
* RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation


      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002057



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002057


5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010221

    Original file (20120010221.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. the last digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show "9"; b. his date of entry be corrected to show 1967 instead of 1962; and c. a second Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be added to his DD Form 214. The applicant states: * His SSN is not correct * He served from 19 July 1967 to 21 March 1969 * He was awarded a second award of the BSM while serving in Vietnam but only...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002530

    Original file (20140002530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS. The available evidence does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS for actions in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011270

    Original file (20120011270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011270 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the Vietnam Service Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 25 April 1968. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004349

    Original file (20110004349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. However, his DD Form 214 only shows the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010893

    Original file (20100010893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He served with the 271st Aviation Company from 5 April 1968 through 14 October 1968 as a 67U c. He served with the 271st Aviation Company from 27 June 1969 through 31 October 1970 as a 67U; d. He participated during four campaign periods; e. He was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Air Medal (2nd Award) with "V" Device, Army Commendation Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003027

    Original file (20090003027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the PH on 10 May 1968; three Army Commendation (ARCOM) medals with "V" (Valor) Device for heroism on 31 January, 9 May, and 16 August 1968; and the BSM on 17 November 1968. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 9 May 1968, as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20, the ARCOM with "V" Device orders for 9 May 1968 on file in his OMPF, an entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, and by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021667

    Original file (20110021667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating during his active duty service; there is no evidence of any disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification for the Army Good Conduct Medal; he attained the rank of sergeant (SGT); and he received multiple awards for meritorious service and achievement, and one for valor. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 22 June 1968 through 12 December 1969 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006726

    Original file (20120006726.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal 7. With respect to the "V" Device, the evidence of record shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for service, not for heroism. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002888

    Original file (20130002888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requested award of the Silver Star and correction of his record to show this award. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 May 1966 through 2 May 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and...