Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001719
Original file (20150001719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  1 September 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001719 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states:

* the doctor that operated on him in the field cauterized the bleeding and offered him his Purple Heart
* he never received recognition on his DD Form 214
* his DD Form 214 should show that he was combat wounded on 8 January 1968, while he was policing up bodies and equipment
* he was wounded by an 81 millimeter mortar round
* at the field hospital his wounds, which were on both legs, were cleaned of shrapnel
* during the night he had a "bleeder" and almost bled to death
* the fact that he was combat wounded never appeared on his 
DD Form 214

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement, dated 21 January 2015 and what appears to be two pages of a partial Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Decision (undated).


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 May 1967.  He completed training as a light weapons infantryman.  He arrived in Vietnam on 16 November 1967.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he arrived as a patient at the Medical Holding Detachment of the 106th General Hospital in Vietnam on 27 January 1968.  He departed Vietnam on 28 January 1968 and he arrived as a patient at Martin Army Hospital, Fort Benning, Georgia.  However, item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 does not contain an entry.

4.  On 29 April 1969, prior to the expiration of his term of service, the applicant received a medical examination and he reported that he had received multiple fragment wounds to his right hip and lower extremities in the Republic of Vietnam. 

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 29 May 1969 at the expiration of his term of service.  His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

6.  The applicant provides what appears to be two pages of a VA Rating Decision which shows he currently has a 90 percent combined service-connected disability rating for medical conditions related to his military service.  These documents do not show that he was wounded due to hostile action while in Vietnam.

7.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), chapter 9, in effect at the time, provided for the preparation and submission of the DA Form 20.  Paragraph 9-53 states that item 40 of the DA Form 20 shows the wounds and reflects a brief description of wounds or injuries requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization and the date wounded or injured.

8.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam Era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

9.  A review of the Vietnam Casualty Listing did not reveal the applicant's name listed as a casualty.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  His supporting evidence has been considered.

2.  Prior to his REFRAD, he reported that he had received multiple fragment wounds to his right hip and lower extremities in the Republic of Vietnam.  Unfortunately, there is no evidence in the available record that confirms the injuries he reported or shows the cause of the injuries.  In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis upon which to correct his DD Form 214 to show the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001719



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001719



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015627

    Original file (20100015627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in Vietnam by enemy mortar on 6 January 1968 but it was never recorded on his DD Form 214. The applicant provides the following: * a self-authored statement * a letter from the National Personnel Records Center * eleven Department of the Army orders * his DD Form 214 * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002025

    Original file (20130002025.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 13173 and certificate for award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005454

    Original file (20120005454.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was awarded the Purple Heart. The medical records that the applicant provides show he was wounded in action on 9 June 1969 when he sustained injuries to his neck and right elbow and a fragment wound to his left hip.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009782

    Original file (20140009782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Evidence of record shows the FSM was wounded in hostile action in Vietnam on 19 November 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from the FSM's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019041

    Original file (20110019041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show the second award of the Purple Heart for wounds he received on 10 May 1968 in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 9 September 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006028C070206

    Original file (20050006028C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. In view of the above, and in the absence of more conclusive evidence that shows the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart or correction of his records to show this decoration. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017793

    Original file (20130017793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in Vietnam from 8 June 1969 to 11 January 1970. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds/injuries, and his treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017314

    Original file (20100017314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Purple Heart was awarded for an injury or wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The evidence of record also shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his service in the Army, he attained the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5, served in Vietnam, and was wounded in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009277

    Original file (20130009277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Another wave hit and the last thing he remembers is hanging on to a safety chain along the boat in water up to his knees. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Award) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Therefore, he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214 at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000671

    Original file (20100000671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster). The applicant states: * He received his first Purple Heart by itself on 25 March 1968 * His second and third Purple Hearts were issued very close together (on 12 April 1968 and 23 April 1968) so he was awarded the Purple Heart with Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster * He has three Purple Hearts, not two,...