Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001460
Original file (20150001460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  1 September 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001460 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was medically discharged.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged from active duty due to medical reasons related to injuries he sustained during military training.  He states that his medical records should show that he injured his back and shoulder.  He also states that he has been trying to obtain his medical records since October 2012 and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is not providing him medical coverage because his records are incorrect.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  An SF (Standard Form) 88 (Report of Medical Examination), completed on
21 November 1981, shows the examining physician found the applicant medically qualified for enlistment in the U.S. Army.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), Delayed Entry Program, on 24 November 1981, with a military service obligation (MSO) of 6 years.  He further enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 
27 July 1982 for a period of 4 years with a training option in military occupational specialty (MOS) 05B (Radio Operator).

4.  Three Records of Counseling, dated 16 and 17 November, and 1 December 1982, show the applicant was counseled for:

* showing no progress in MOS 05B course
* failing to meet course objectives for MOS 05B
* discharge action under the provisions of the Trainee Discharge Program

5.  On 24 November 1982, the applicant's company commander initiated action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct – Trainee Discharge Program).

   a.  The reasons for her proposed action were the applicant demonstrated that he could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation, or self-discipline.

	b.  The applicant was advised of his rights and the separation procedures involved.  He was informed he had the right to request a separation physical if he felt his physical status had changed since his last examination.

   c.  He was also advised that, because he was in entry level status, the period of his service would be uncharacterized.

6.   On 29 November 1982, the applicant acknowledged notification of the proposed entry level, uncharacterized separation from the U.S. Army.

   a.  He elected not to submit statements in his own behalf.

   b.  He indicated he did not desire to have a separation medical examination if the proposed separation action was approved.

   c.  The applicant placed his signature on the document.
7.  The chain of command recommended approval of the applicant's separation action based on his entry level status performance and conduct.

8.  On 6 December 1982, the separation authority approved the commander's recommendation for discharge of the applicant, directed an entry level status separation of uncharacterized, and transfer of the applicant to the USAR (Individual Ready Reserve) to complete his MSO.

9.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty) shows he entered active duty on 27 July 1982, was released from active duty on 10 December 1982 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, based on entry level status performance and conduct, and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training).  He had completed 4 months and 14 days of net active service during this period.

10.  USAR Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, Orders D-07-055054, dated 
20 July 1988, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR (Ready Reserve) effective 26 July 1988.

11.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.
   
   a.  In each case, it is necessary to compare the nature and degree of physical disability present with the requirements of the duties the Soldier reasonably may be expected to perform because of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his/her employment on active duty.

   b.  Chapter 3 (Policies) provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his/her continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he/she was unable to perform his/her duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation rendered the member unfit.

12.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 3 (Character of Service/Description of Service), paragraph 3-9, provides that separation will be described as entry level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry level status.
	b.  Chapter 11 provides policy and guidance for the separation of personnel because of unsatisfactory performance or conduct while in an entry level status.  Personnel who enlisted in the RA are considered to be in an entry level status if, before the date of the initiation of separation action, they have completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty.  Service of personnel separated under the provisions of this chapter will be described as "uncharacterized."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was medically discharged because he sustained injuries to his back and shoulder during military training.

2.  Records show the applicant entered active duty in the RA on 27 July 1982.

	a.  The regulatory guidance shows that personnel who enlist in the RA are considered to be in an entry level status if, before the date of the initiation of separation action, they have completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty.  The service of personnel separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, will be described as uncharacterized.

   b.  On 24 November 1982, the company commander initiated separation action because the applicant could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training due to aptitude, ability, motivation, or self-discipline.  At that time, the applicant had completed less than 4 months (less than 120 days) of active duty service.

   c.  The separation authority approved the separation action and directed an entry level status separation of uncharacterized.  Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 10 December 1982.  He was credited with completing 4 months and 14 days of net active service during the period of service under review.

3.  Records show the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, based on entry level performance and conduct was administratively correct and in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time.

4.  Despite the applicant's contention, there is no evidence of record that shows he sustained injuries to his back and/or shoulder during military training or that he had a medically unfitting condition that precluded him from fulfilling his active duty enlistment commitment.

   a.  It is noted that the applicant declined the opportunity to have a separation medical examination prior to his separation from active duty, which might have offered evidence of his medical condition(s) at the time of separation.

   b.  When a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness.

5.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001460



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001460



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001099

    Original file (20150001099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 November 1982, the applicant's company commander initiated action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct – Trainee Discharge Program). Records show the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, based on entry level performance and conduct was administratively correct and in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013528

    Original file (20110013528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 March 1983, the applicant's commander notified the applicant that he was recommending that he be separated from the service under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, Trainee Discharge Program (TDP), due to a lack of physical aptitude. This regulation was revised effective 1 October 1982 to delete the expeditious discharge program and provide for an uncharacterized separation for Soldiers separated with 180 days or less of continuous service. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015119

    Original file (20090015119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 January 2009, she requested separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 8-1, by reason of pregnancy with a desired separation date of 1 April 2009. She may request a specific separation date; however, the separation authority and her military physician will determine the separation date. With respect to medical disability, the evidence of record shows she suffered some illnesses during her military service and was seen by medical personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023636

    Original file (20110023636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 February 1991, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, with uncharacterized service. This chapter applied to Soldiers who were in an entry-level status and completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty before the date of the initiation of separation action. Chapter 2 contains item-by-item preparation instructions for the DD Form 214 as follows: * item 6 shows the completion date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022061

    Original file (20120022061.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant should be separated from the service. The applicant should be separated from the service. He provided insufficient evidence and there is no evidence of record to support his contention that he should have received a medical discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011342C070208

    Original file (20040011342C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 December 1982, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate her from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, for entry-level status performance and conduct. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant has submitted insufficient evidence with her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005243

    Original file (20110005243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her uncharacterized discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a medical discharge. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Service medical records * Service personnel records * DVA medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 11 December 1982, the applicant’s unit commander initiated action to separate her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011199

    Original file (20120011199.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the characterization of his service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable on the following documents: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 28 February 1985 * National Guard Board (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) with an effective date of 28 February 1985 2. b. Paragraph 5-5 stated personnel being separated under this section would be awarded a character of service of honorable,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020747

    Original file (20120020747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his status in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) from 8 September 2002 through 13 February 2005, in effect: * item 6 (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) to show "2005 02 13" * item 9 (Command to Which Transferred) to show he was transferred to the USAR IRR 2. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 1-35, states Soldiers with a remaining military service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013260

    Original file (20140013260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her uncharacterized separation from the Regular Army (RA) be changed to an honorable separation. On 11 May 1983, she received formal counseling and she voluntarily elected to separate from active duty service due to pregnancy pursuant to Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 8. Service members separated for pregnancy while in an entry-level status were to receive an entry-level (i.e., uncharacterized) separation.