Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000929
Original file (20150000929.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 August 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000929 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 May 1991 to show his last name as Z__on vice Z__o.

2.  The applicant states his formal last name is Z__on, yet his DD Form 214 reflects his name misspelled as Z__o.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 May 1991 and birth certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 29 September 1975.  His DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 29 September 1975, shows his last name as Z__o.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 20 September 1978 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) of the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued for this period of service shows his last name as Z__o.

4.  On 21 July 1979, he enlisted in the Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG).  His record contains numerous orders, personnel, medical, and legal documents, that all show his last name as Z__o.  He authenticated many of these forms by placing his signature in the appropriate block using the last name of Z__o. 

5.  On 30 November 1990, he entered active duty as a member of the LAARNG in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm.  He was honorably released from active duty on 16 May 1991 to the control of the LAARNG.  Item 1 (Name (Last, First, Middle)) of the DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows his last name as Z__o.  He authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block of the DD Form 214 using the last name of Z__o. 

6.  He continued to service in the LAARNG throughout several reenlistments and/or extensions using the last name of Z__o.  

7.  Orders 111-021, dated 20 April 2000, issued by the LAARNG, discharged him from the ARNG effective 30 June 2000 and assigned him to the Retired Reserve on 1 July 2000.  These orders show his last name as Z__o.  

8.  Item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) of the National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) he was issued shows his last name as Z__o.  

9.  The applicant provides a State of Louisiana Certificate of Live Birth, issued on 1 April 2005, wherein it shows his last name as Z__on.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms when the applicant enlisted in the RA in 1975 and in the ARNG in 1979 he listed his last name as Z__o.  This is the last name he used throughout his military service until he was discharged from the ARNG in June 2000 and transferred to the Retired Reserve.

2.  The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty and provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty.  There are no provisions in the governing regulation to change the name on a DD Form 214 to reflect a name acquired after the Soldier's release from active duty.  His DD Form 214 correctly shows his last name as Z__o, the name he held at the time he was released from active duty.  Therefore, there is no basis to grant him the requested relief.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable that the applicant now desires to record a different last name in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records.

4.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in his official record.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the last name he now holds and the last name recorded in his military record.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000929



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000929



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009829

    Original file (20120009829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) and all accompanying allied documents listed his middle name as "Joseph." The middle name "Adam" does not appear on any documents contained in his military records. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065610C070421

    Original file (2001065610C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: NG Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 20 November 1988 indicates he had 14 years, 1 month and 7 days of prior active federal service; 2 years, 10 months and 3 days of prior reserve component service; and 6 years, 8 months and 16 days for his current period of ARNG service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001796C070205

    Original file (20060001796C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The standard time in grade for promotion to 1LT is 2 years or 18 months. The officer’s records will be screened to determine eligibility for promotion to the next higher grade far enough in advance to permit promotion on the date promotion service is completed. While the advisory opinion noted that an updated security clearance and current physical were required at the time the applicant was due for promotion, it is acknowledged that there is no evidence to show he did not meet those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021210

    Original file (20100021210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 April 1999 to change her first name and middle name to Daphne Amber instead of David Wayne. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075779C070403

    Original file (2002075779C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. A Qualifying Service for Retired Pay worksheet dated 12 October 1982 prepared by the Louisiana State Adjutant General's Office indicated the applicant had a total of 23 years, 6 months, and 15 days of qualifying service; however, he did not have 8 years of Reserve service since his last Regular Army service and he would not be eligible for retirement until 11 March 1984. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013002

    Original file (20130013002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show, in effect: * he was injured at Fort Dix, NJ and received medical treatment on 15 July 1989 * the separation date on his 1990 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect a date in 1991 * pay for active duty during November and December 1990 2. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was injured and received medical treatment on or about 15 July 1989, REFRAD in 1991,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015625

    Original file (20060015625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers)), dated 24 February 2000, shows that the applicant qualified for appointment as a 1LT Physician Assistant, he was awarded 3 years of constructive credit for professional experience with an additional 3 years and 25 days of constructive credit for prior active commissioned service credit that totaled 6 years and 25 days of entry credit. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was correctly awarded six...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016424

    Original file (20140016424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his last name as C____ instead of S____. The applicant's military service records show he served in the Regular Army under the last name S____. Army records created after his separation from the Regular Army show his name was recorded as C____.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088155C070403

    Original file (2003088155C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be reinstated to his state Active/Guard Reserve (AGR) position in the Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) and be allowed to complete his enlistment. The applicant was separated from active duty and transferred to the LAARNG on 7 January 1999. As previously noted, the Board does not have the authority to reinstate the applicant to his position in the AGR or as a member of the LAARNG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003093

    Original file (20110003093.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 for this period of service shows the: * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Armed Forces Reserve Medal with "M" Device * Army Service Ribbon * LA (Louisiana) War Cross 4. Therefore, since he requests the ACM in lieu of the already-awarded GWOTEM he is entitled to have the ACM with one bronze service star added to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 March...