IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 August 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000805
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his records to show his social security number (SSN) as "X6X-XX-XXXX" instead of "X1X-XX-XXXX" and that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) for 1 year and 16 days instead of 1 month and
16 [sic] days.
2. The reverse side of the application shows a comment that refers to the applicant and shows "he is entitled to life insurance (group) of $10K according to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and he has not received his benefits from the VA [Department of Veterans Affairs] until recently and they are almost nothing."
3. The applicant provides copy of his DD Form 214 and a picture of himself.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. A DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), prepared by the applicant on 1 December 1966 as part of his processing for enlistment in the Regular Army (RA), shows he entered "X6X-XX-XXXX" in the SSN block.
3. The applicant enlisted in the RA on 13 February 1967. At the time he enlisted, the U.S. Armed Forces did not use the SSN for identification; he was issued a service number.
4. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), in pertinent part, shows in:
* item 1 (Name and Service Number): "X1X-XX-XXXX"
* item 29 (Foreign Service), he served in Vietnam from 20 September 1969 through 3 November 1969 (1 month)
* item 38 (Record of Assignments):
* Computer Analyst, Headquarters Support Troops, Vietnam, from
23 September 1969 through 27 October 1969
* Patient, Medical Holding Detachment (MHD), 249th General Hospital, Camp Drake, Japan, from 28 October 1969 through 4 November 1969
* Patient, MHD, Patterson Army Hospital, Medical Department Activity, Fort Monmouth, NJ , from 5 November 1969 through 27 May 1970
5. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active (REFRAD) duty on 28 May 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement). It also shows he was held in service 106 days for the convenience of the Government. He had completed 3 years,
3 months, and 16 days of total active service. It further shows in:
* item 3 (SSN): "X1X-XX-XXXX"
* item 22 (Statement of Service), block c (Foreign and/or Sea Service): "Vietnam 0 years, 1 month, 14 days"
* item 29 (Servicemen's' Group Life Insurance Coverage (SGLI)): an "X" in the box indicating "$10,000"
6. Office of the Adjutant General, U.S. Army Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, Letter Orders Number 04-1060076, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 22 April 1971. The orders show his SSN as "X1X-XX-XXXX."
7. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes policies and procedures regarding separation documents. It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.
a. The purpose of a separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service at the time of separation. Therefore, it is important that the information entered thereon is complete and accurate as of that date.
b. Chapter 1 (General) contains guidance for the preparation of the DD Form 214. It states that all available records will be used as a basis for the preparation of the DD Form 214, including the enlistment contract, Enlisted Qualification Record and orders. It shows for:
(1) item 3, verify accuracy with the SSN of record;
(2) item 22c, enter total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed; and
(3) item 29, an "X" will be placed in the appropriate box indicating the individual's election to participate in the SGLI.
8. United States Code, Title 38 (Veterans' Benefits) governs veterans' benefits administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Veterans Affairs. The VA website at www.va.benefits.gov/insurance shows that an individual must apply to convert SGLI to Veteran's Group Life Insurance (VGLI) within one year and 120 days from discharge. Veterans who submit their application within 240 days of discharge do not need to submit evidence of good health, while those who apply more than 240 days after discharge are required to answer questions about their health.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The U.S. Army was not using the SSN for identification purposes at the time the applicant enlisted. However, upon entry into military service, his SSN was recorded in his military records as "X6X-XX-XXXX."
2. The available evidence shows the applicant's correct SSN was entered in his military records during the period of his active duty. However, it appears that during his service an administrative error occurred resulting in the incorrect listing of his SSN on his DD Form 214 when he was REFRAD. Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his correct SSN as shown on his DD Form 398.
3. Records show the applicant served overseas from 20 September 1969 through 3 November 1969.
a. A calculation of the applicant's overseas service shows the following:
1969 11 03 date returned to U.S. from overseas
- 1969 09 20 date departed U.S. for overseas
= 00 01 13
+ 1 day inclusive
= 00 01 14 total foreign service
b. This total foreign service is recorded in item 22c of his DD From 214.
4. The administration of veterans' benefits does not fall under the purview of the Department of the Army or the ABCMR. Any questions the applicant may have pertaining to his veteran's benefits should be addressed to the VA.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
___X____ ___X____ ___X____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the current entry from item 3 of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the SSN as shown on his DD Form 398.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to foreign and/or sea service.
_______ _ X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150000805
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150000805
5
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004236
However, a review of his official military personnel file (OMPF) revealed two documents prepared during his active service containing an SSN: * a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 9 November 1965, that shows his SSN as x8x-xx-xxxx * a DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data), dated 28 February 1967, that shows his SSN as x6x-xx-xxxx 4. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided, which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003109
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and other military records to show his social security number (SSN) as "X1X-XX-XXXX" instead of "X3X-XX-XXXX." However, his DA Form 20 and his DD Form 214 were changed by pencil to show the same SSN shown on his DD Form 398 and his DA Form 41. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014015
His military records show he was inducted into the Army on 28 July 1966. This DD Form 214 shows his SSN as X0X-XX-XXXX. Although all the documents in his records containing a SSN, with the exception of the DD Form 398, show his SSN as X0X-XX-XXXX, the DD Form 398 was completed by the applicant 2 days prior to his induction in the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027885
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows in item 3 (SSN) the entry "x4x-xx-xxxx" and his DD Form 214 does not reflect a HOR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014539
His DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record-Armed Forces of the United States), dated 21 May 1964 shows his DOB as "4 Nxxxxxxr XXXX" but does not list his SSN. There is no evidence of record showing the applicant ever used the DOB "26 Oxxxxxr XXXX " during the period of his military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214 to show the SSN listed on his DD Form 398.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004067
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The only documents located within his record reflecting an SSN of xx9-xx-xxxx, are: * his DD Form 398, dated 24 September 1965 * a DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data), dated 23 August 1966 * his DD Form 214 * Letter Order Number 09-1208548, dated 22 September 1971, honorably discharging him from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) 4. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his SSN as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004664
Accordingly, his DD Form 214 was voided and he was reissued a new DD Form 214 that reflects his upgraded characterization of service. The evidence of record shows that upon his enlistment in the USAR and subsequent enlistment in the RA and entry on active duty, the applicant listed his SSN as "522-xx-xxxx." Therefore, absent convincing independent and verifiable evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the applicant's military service records, including the DD Form 214, were correct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017323
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as X1X-X0-8XXX vice X3X-XX-9XXX. His record contains a: * DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 6 December 1966, which shows his SSN as X1X-X0-8XXX * DA Form 3027 (U.S. Army Request for National Agency Check), dated 2 February 1967, which shows his SSN as X1X-X0-8XXX? Item 3 (SSN) of his DD Form 214 shows his SSN as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000723
Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The applicant served in Vietnam during a qualifying period; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 December 1971 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016182
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of documents contained in the applicant's military personnel records show his SSN appears as both "352-XX-XXXX" and "357-XX-XXXX" on several documents dated throughout his tenure of service. Item 13 (Employment SSN) of the applicant's DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 8 August 1967, shows his SSN as "352-XX-XXXX."