Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000792
Original file (20150000792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  	11 August 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000792 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) to honorable.

2.  The applicant states:

* he completed 5 years of service with no adverse action
* one incident shouldn't constitute a discharge UOTHC without a fair review of his service record
* he received two letters of commendation
* he served in Southwest Asia

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 December 1986 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13E (cannon fire direction specialist).  He was honorably discharged on 30 November 1989 for immediate reenlistment.  He reenlisted on 1 December 1989 for a period of 5 years.  He served in Southwest Asia from 6 October 1990 to 26 April 1991.

3.  His records are void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge action.  However, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged UOTHC on 15 November 1991 in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 
635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10.  He completed a total of 4 years, 10 months, and 17 days of creditable active service.

4.  There is no evidence that shows he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory, but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that his separation processing was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.  Without the discharge packet to consider, it is presumed the authority and reason for his discharge were commensurate with his overall record of service.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000792



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000792



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015102

    Original file (20130015102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows he served in Southwest Asia from 4 December 1990 to 23 April 1991. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 8 November 1989 to 7 November 1992 * adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003021

    Original file (20130003021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his service in Operation Desert Storm. Accordingly, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 16 February 1989 to 15 February 1992 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011014

    Original file (20140011014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains a DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service - for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes), dated 15 August 2005, wherein it shows his projected demobilization date was 20 August 2005 and he had served as follows in the: * USAR DEP - 3 March to 26 June 1989 * RA - 27 June to 9 November 1989 * USAR (not on active duty) - 5 December 2003 to 6 June 2004 * USAR (on active duty) - 7 June 2004 to 20 August 2005 7. His record does not contain orders or any other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002714

    Original file (20110002714.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 31 January 1993, to show the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (3rd Award). As a secondary issue, the applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Southwest Asia Service Medal, which he states was cut off of the edge of his DD Form 214. Permanent orders awarded him the MSM and 3 awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008894

    Original file (20080008894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that service in the Persian Gulf War is to be recognized by award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal to Army members who participated in Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the designated area on or after 2 August 1990. However, even if his unit did in fact deploy to Southwest Asia during Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm, there is no evidence in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018376

    Original file (20110018376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110018376 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008132

    Original file (20140008132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 27 January 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140008132 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He states his overseas duty is not documented on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by making the following corrections to his DD Form 214: a. deleting from block 12f of his DD Form 214 the current entry and replacing it with the entry "0000 06 28"; b. adding to block 13 of his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009850

    Original file (20140009850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his foreign service in Southwest Asia in support of Operations Desert Shield/Storm. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of item 12f of his DD Form 214 to show 2 years and 3 months of foreign service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000091

    Original file (20150000091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served in Iraq from 1 January to mid July 1990 which is not reflected in item 12f of his DD Form 214; however, item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 lists his service in Southwest Asia from 1 January to 17 May 1991. It states for: a. item 12f, enter the total amount of foreign service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214; b. item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), list awards and decorations for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011874

    Original file (20110011874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his foreign service while deployed in support of Operation Desert Storm from December 1990 to May 1991 * award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal 2. Evidence also shows he participated in three campaigns while serving in Southwest Asia. Although his Army Commendation Medal was awarded for his service in support of Operations Desert Shield/Storm from 17 September 1990 to...