Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000770
Original file (20150000770 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 October 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000770 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he made a timely Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) spouse only election and that she be paid a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.  

2.  The applicant states that the FSM was never briefed by the Army Reserve about signing up for the SBP and therefore he should be enrolled.

3.  The applicant provides a one-page letter explaining her application, a copy of the FSM’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), his retirement orders, marriage license, and death certificate. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in the pay grade of E-7 on 3 February 1993 when he received his notification of eligibility for non-regular retired pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter).  The notification advised the FSM that he had 90 days to enroll in the RCSBP or he could enroll in the SBP at the time he applied for retired pay at age 60.  There is no indication in his records to show that he enrolled in the RCSBP.

2.  On 18 January 1994, the FSM was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired).

3.  On 15 July 2002, the FSM submitted a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel).  He indicated that he was single with no eligible dependents and elected not to participate in the SBP. 

4.  On 17 April 2004, he was transferred to the AUS Retired List at age 60.

5.  The FSM married the applicant on 17 November 2006.  However, there is no evidence to show that he attempted to enroll in the SBP within 1 year of his marriage to the applicant.  

6.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; or (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  If death occurs before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the annuity. 

7.  Under the law at the time the FSM was issued his 20-year letter, a member must have made the election within 90 days of receiving the 20-year letter or wait until he/she applied for retired pay and elected to participate in the standard SBP. Failure to elect an option resulted in the default election of option A.

8.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that the FSM should be enrolled in the SBP because he was not properly informed of the provisions of SBP has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The FSM declined enrollment in the SBP and there is no evidence to suggest that he attempted to enroll in the SBP within 1 year of his marriage.

3.  Accordingly, since there is no evidence to show that he ever enrolled in the RCSBP or attempted to opt for any coverage under that program, there is no basis for granting the applicant the relief she is seeking.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _____________x____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000770





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000770



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013584

    Original file (20100013584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the record of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected spouse coverage based on full retired pay under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant states the FSM elected children-only RCSBP coverage when he retired from the U.S. Army Reserve in 1987 and did not have a spouse at that time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008972

    Original file (20060008972.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence the FSM enrolled in RCSBP at this time. The evidence of record does not show the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP at the time he received his 20-Year Letter. If the FSM was not married at the time he received his 20-Year Letter and he married the applicant on 13 June 1996, he was eligible to enroll in the RCSBP within one year of the marriage date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014052

    Original file (20110014052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her husband, a deceased retired former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected spouse coverage in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) within 1 year of their marriage. The applicant states the FSM was not married at the time he received his 20-year letter so he had no election to be made for RCSBP. The evidence shows the FSM was electing SBP coverage for the applicant based on the full amount of his retired pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006862

    Original file (20070006862.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. By law, a member who was not married upon becoming eligible to participate in the RCSBP, but who later marries may elect to participate in the RCSBP. In this case, the FSM and applicant were married on 13 June 1992.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006475

    Original file (20140006475.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's record to show she is eligible to receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. On 17 March 2005, he was notified that he had completed the required years of qualifying Reserve service to be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016746

    Original file (20100016746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states she and her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), married on 19 May 2006 and did not realize she had to be enrolled in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) within 1 year of marriage until 20 November 2008 when they completed the FSM's application for retired pay. On 19 May 2006, the FSM married the applicant. Based on the FSM's election, his application for spouse SBP and/or RCSBP was denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013725C070206

    Original file (20050013725C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008620

    Original file (20090008620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The FSM's records indicate that he had no eligible dependents at the time he made his election and declined to participate in the RCSBP 3. Although the FSM had two opportunities during which to enroll the applicant in the RCSBP, his record is devoid of any evidence and the applicant has failed to provide any evidence that the FSM attempted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010010

    Original file (20100010010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM was born on 23 February 1968 and he enlisted in the Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) on 11 August 1986. Therefore, even if he had been married to the applicant for a year, she would still not be eligible to receive an SBP annuity because the FSM named his children as the beneficiaries of his SBP annuity and never added the applicant. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005016

    Original file (20130005016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the brother of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his brother's record to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for child coverage for his daughter. The applicant provides: * a timeline of events related to the FSM's SBP election * the FSM's 20-Year Letter * 3 death certificates for the FSM and each of his parents * the FSM's daughter's birth certificate * Court-issued paternity documents for the FSM's daughter * the...