Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000735
Original file (20150000735 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000735 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Commendation Medal and Army Achievement Medal.

2.  The applicant states she received the Army Commendation Medal a few days after her separation and the Army Achievement Medal shortly before her separation.  Apparently because of the late date of the awards, they were not included on her DD Form 214.  She has recently been commissioned in the United States Public Health Service (PHS) and would like to wear all of her awards.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214, a USPHS Award Authorization letter, and a letter of support.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served on active duty from 19 January 1995 through 22 December 1997, attaining the rank and grade of specialist E-4.  She was honorably discharged to attend an officer training program.

3.  Her DD Form 214 does not list the Army Commendation Medal or Army Achievement Medal. 

4.  Her record contains no documentation indicating she received the requested awards. 

5.  The USPHS award authorization letter state the applicant is authorized to wear the PHS Regular Corps Ribbon, PHS Commissioned Corps Training Ribbon, Army Service Ribbon, and the National Defense Service Medal.

6.  In her letter of support, CW2 K____ A_____ states she was present when the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Achievement Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that for award of all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available records are void of documentation verifying that orders were published announcing award of the Army Commendation Medal or Army Achievement Medal to the applicant.

2.  Without official documentation confirming orders were published, there is insufficient corroborating evidence to verify either the applicant's or CW2 A____'s statements.

3.  The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any verifiable evidence that she was authorized and awarded the Army Commendation Medal or the Army Achievement Medal. 


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000735



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000735



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016476

    Original file (20140016476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the following awards: * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with one bronze service star * Kuwait Liberation Medal - Saudi Arabia * Kuwait Liberation Medal - Government of Kuwait 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066988C070402

    Original file (2002066988C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her date of rank (DOR) to Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) and that she be awarded all back pay and allowances. Orders were published on 21 October 2001 which promoted the applicant to CW2 with an effective date of 23 January 2000 and with a DOR of 23 January 2000. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that there is no error or injustice in this case regarding the applicant's DOR to CW2; however, it would be appropriate to award the applicant all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014543

    Original file (20080014543.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show she was awarded three Army Achievement Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. The evidence shows the applicant was awarded two Army Achievement Medals in the period covered by her DD Form 214 and was recommended for a third award; however, there is insufficient evidence to show that after the battalion commander approved the recommendation for an additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018797

    Original file (20080018797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides in support of her application, a copy of the FSM's Certificate of Death; a photograph of a Distinguished Flying Cross; a newspaper article dated 7 April 1971, indicating that the FSM was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross; a copy of an undated newspaper article referencing his Army service; a copy of a Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association (VHPA) Members listing; a copy of the FSM's Identification and Privilege Card; copies of the FSM's DD Forms 214; and a Personal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010183

    Original file (20080010183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Correction of her records to show she was granted an additional 6 months of constructive service credit (CSC) for continued appointment in the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) Reserve Corps prior to direct commission into the U.S Army Medical Corps (MC); b. d. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland (MD), Personnel Order Number 8263.001, dated 19 September 1988. e. U.S. Public Health Service, Department of HHS, Statement of Service, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004825

    Original file (20120004825.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the following awards: Iraq Campaign Medal, Overseas Service Ribbon, "Professional Chemical Corps," "Military Service Discharge," "Installation Service (Fort Polk)," Purple Heart, Army Commendation Medal, and the Army Achievement Medal. The applicant's DD Form 214 lists her awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and Army Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001038

    Original file (20110001038.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she completed a deployment in support of OIF from 17 September 2006 to 27 August 2007 and that based on this foreign service she is entitled to the following awards: * Army Commendation Medal (6th Award) * Overseas Service Bars (2) * Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) * Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) 3. In addition, item 18 of her final DD Form 214 should also be corrected by adding the entries: * "ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016987

    Original file (20110016987.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. Her DD Form 214, dated 12 June 2008, should be amended to show her foreign service credit and that she is authorized the following awards: * Army Commendation Medal (Second Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (Fourth Award) * National Defense Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal * Iraq Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars * Overseas Service Ribbon (Numeral 2) * Army Lapel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013170

    Original file (20130013170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – * Korean Service Medal (KSM) * United Nations Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * item 26 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) – 2 months and 21 days * Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) – "Korea 31 Aug 50" 5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025101

    Original file (20110025101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Believing that the warrant officer at the school had some sort of issue with the applicant, and knowing that she was physically able to perform sit-ups, he took it upon himself to alter the documents. k. Counsel argues that the CW2 was a key witness to the applicant's defense because, without his testimony, the applicant had no evidence other than her own testimony that she did not submit the falsified document. Over the objections of the applicant's counsel, the summary court-martial...