Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000652
Original file (20150000652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  15 September 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000652 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his records be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal.

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal on 11 May 1970 in Phu Loi, Vietnam.  He has the medal and case and a journal to his wife but not any official paper work.

3.  The applicant provides a photo of the Army Commendation Medal and case and a portion of a personal journal. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served on active duty from 26 September 1968 through 26 July 1971 with service in Vietnam from 9 June 1969 to 8 June 1970.

3.  His available service records do not include any reference to any awards.

4.  His DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) both list his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that for award of all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The journal entry and medal with display case are insufficient to show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.  Unfortunately, this evidence does not confirm that the award was approved by the chain of command and announced in orders.

2.  Without official documentation confirming that orders were published there is an insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000652



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000652



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008640

    Original file (20090008640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds that when his recommendation for the Soldier's Medal was downgraded to an ARCOM with "V" Device, awarding him the DFC had been discussed. The local awards board recommended approval but one awards board member recommended that the award be downgraded to an Air Medal with "V" Device. The Awards Board concluded that there was insufficient evidence to award the applicant the Purple Heart and recommended that he contact the National Personnel Records Center to obtain his unit's morning...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018925

    Original file (20090018925.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his 1970 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect the following: * Two awards of the Army Commendation Medal * Bronze Star Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Air Medal * Air Assault Badge * Assignment to Company B, 3rd Battalion, 1st Infantry vice 15th Infantry in item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) 2. There is no evidence in available records confirming the applicant was ever awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007313

    Original file (20130007313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant provides: * a Purple Heart Certificate, dated 16 September 1969, wherein it shows he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 18 August 1969 * an Army Commendation Medal Citation, undated, wherein it shows he was presented the Army Commendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006367

    Original file (20110006367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Air Medal. General orders awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, Bronze Star Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), and the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) which are not shown on his DD Form 214. With respect to his request to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show award of the Air Medal, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010590

    Original file (20120010590.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Air Medal (AM), and Bronze Star Medal (BSM). There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence which shows he was recommended for or awarded the BSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009896

    Original file (20100009896.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * orders confirming his unit of assignment in Vietnam * general orders announcing award of the ARCOM * a letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (AHRC) Military Awards Branch (MAB) denying his request for the CIB * six statements of support with attached DD Forms 214 from veterans who served with him in Vietnam CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005918

    Original file (20140005918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a citation and certificate that show the Bronze Star Medal was awarded for the period 14 March 1969 to 14 February 1970. The evidence in the available record and the citation and certificate he provided are insufficient to confirm he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding to his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000839

    Original file (20150000839.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the absence of orders to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. While the applicant's service in Vietnam in an infantry MOS is not in question, there is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was personally present and under hostile fire while his unit was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011745

    Original file (20140011745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show award of the Army Commendation Medal and there are no orders in his official military records authorizing him award of this medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him this medal for the period 9 January 1969 through 13 October 1971 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021534

    Original file (20090021534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following supporting evidence: a. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with a separation date of 8 January 1971; b. DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) showing he was recommended for the Army Commendation Medal by the commander of the 551st Medical Company (Ambulance), Fort Lewis, WA, for service from 30 July 1970 to 10 January 1971; and c. General Order Number 1 issued by Headquarters, 62nd Medical Group, Fort Lewis,...