IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 9 June 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000524
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his records by the Fiscal Year 2014 (FY14) Officer Separation Board (OSB).
2. The applicant states his Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for the rating period October 2011 through July 2012 was not uploaded to his OSB packet. This error in his military records should be considered an injustice.
3. The applicant provides an OER for the rating period 20110907 through 20120223.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a commissioned officer of the Army with concurrent call to active duty on 25 May 2006. He completed the Field Artillery Basic Officer Leader Course.
2. He served in a variety of stateside or overseas assignments and he was promoted to captain (CPT) on 1 June 2009.
3. Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 13-356, dated 6 December 2013, Subject: FY14 OSB and Enhanced Selective Early Retirement Boards (E-SERB) CPT, Army Competitive category (ACC), announced the criteria and zones of consideration for the FY14 OSB. Year Group 2006 CPTs with a date of rank between 29 January 2009 and 28 February 2010 will be considered by the E-SERB (if they have 18 or more years of active federal service service as of the convene date, scheduled for 6 to 20 March 2014) and by the OSB (if they have less than 18 years of active federal service as of the convene date).
a. My Board File (MBF) for affected officers opens on or about 13 December 2013 and closes on 27 February 2014.
b. Secretary of the Army approval of the board report is final action. No relook or standby boards will be established nor is there an appeal process. Officers who believe their selection for early retirement or separation (as appropriate) resulted from an error in their military records or that their selection constitutes an injustice may seek relief from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
c. In order to be considered by the board, mandatory or optional OERs must be received error-free by HRC no later than 21 February 2014. An "HRC-Directed" OER is required only for those CPTs who have not had an OER rendered in the last 180 days prior to 1 March 2014. Officers with missing OERs or those who have OERs with errors should, in effect, resolve those issues ahead of time.
4. The applicant was considered and selected for separation by the OSB. He was so notified. Accordingly, he was honorably discharged from active duty on 1 April 2015 under chapter 5 of Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Separations) by reason of early separation with entitlement to separation pay. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he completed 8 years, 10 months, and 7 days of active (commissioned) service and 4 years, 11 months, and 18 days of prior active (enlisted) service.
5. The applicant provides a copy of his Change of Rater OER for the rating period 20110907 through 20120223. This OER was signed by his rating officials on 22 October 2014 and 6 November 2014 respectively and by the applicant on 15 December 2014. This OER continues to have errors and is not posted to his official military personnel file (OMPF).
6. An advisory opinion was received from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) on 26 March 2015 in the processing of this case. An advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request. He stated:
a. A review of the applicant's OMPF indicates there is no administrative action to be taken. The only OER missing from his OMPF was the Change of Rater OER for the rating period 20110907 through 20120223. The OER for the rating period 20120224 through 20120721 was received and processed.
b. The Change of Rater OER for the rating period 20110907 through 20120223 was submitted by the unit and received by HRC on 15 December 2014 but it was rejected as an invalid report. The report was invalid because of the minimum grade of the senior rater was not met and the report was never resubmitted by his unit for processing. Army Regulation 623-3 (Evaluation Reporting System), paragraph 2-7 and Table 2-1 provide guidance that the minimum senior rater grade for a CPT is a lieutenant colonel (LTC), a promotable major (MAJ(P)) serving in an authorized billet for the higher grade, or a civilian GS-13 or above.
c. The applicant's unit should complete the OER by ensuring the senior rater is identified to meet the regulation and resubmit the corrected report to HRC. The omission of this report from the applicant's OMPF is not grounds for a special selection board. The omitted report would not have been a factor in not being selected by the OSB.
7. The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for review and comment. He did not respond within the time allotted.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
The applicant was considered by an OSB and selected for separation no later than 1 April 2015. It appears he had a missing OER for the rating period 20110907 through 20120223. However, the omitted OER was not a factor in his selection for separation by the OSB. Appeals are appropriate when an officer is considered by such board when he/she should not have been. This is not the case here. As such, he does not qualify for an OSB reconsideration.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ____x___ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150000524
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150000524
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003177
The applicant provides: * Officer Record Brief * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 1 April 2015 * three Officer Evaluation Reports (OER) for the rank of first lieutenant (1LT) * five OERs for the rank of captain (CPT) * Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 13-356, issued 6 December 2013 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. HRC should expand from just the targeted year groups or considered populations and include the entire active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014935
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 January 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140014935 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was notified by his chain of command that he was selected for separation by the FY14 CPT OSB. After the Secretary of the Army approves the board reports, officers selected for separation will be personally notified of their selection, followed by official correspondence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017253
The applicant requests his records go before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration to captain (CPT). He was not promoted to CPT due to an administrative error; his rater did not complete his Officer Evaluation Report (OER) until after the promotion board. The applicant contends his records should go before an SSB for promotion consideration to CPT because an OER he received for the rating period 9 February 2013 through 8 February 2014 was not available for the board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015393
The applicant states: a. He was non-selected for promotion by the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) CPT Promotion Selection Board that convened in April 2014. The applicant contends his records should go before an SSB for promotion consideration to CPT because an OER he received for the rating period 2 August 2013 through 27 March 2014 was not available for the board to review and he believes he would have been selected for promotion had the OER been in his board file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015461
The applicant requests consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer three (CW3)/pay grade W-3 by a special selection board (SSB). The applicant states an annual officer evaluation report (OER) was not submitted in time for the promotion board to review. This paragraph provides that officers in the zone of consideration will review and update their Officer Record Brief (ORB); all current, available admissible personal information will be submitted to the Official Military Personnel...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016378
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his promotion board file certification status and consideration for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/pay grade O-5 by a special selection board (SSB). His DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) which was signed on 13 January 2014 prior to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 LTC promotion board should be added to his promotion board file for consideration by an SSB. However, there is no evidence and he provided no evidence showing he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003515
The viewing of his General Officer Memorandum Of Reprimand (GOMOR) by the Officer Separation Board (OSB) due to the reduction in force was an infraction because he was not given the opportunity to review the GOMOR documentation or provide comments since it did not post into his official military personnel file (OMPF) (previously known as the Army Military Human Resource Record) in iPERMS until 23 April 2014. b. d. He contends he suffered an injustice because his GOMOR was filed in his OMPF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140020958
The applicant requests correction of her record to show her request to transfer her education benefits to her eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. The applicant provides: * Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, Director of Military Personnel Management (DMPM), denial of applicant's request for a TEB exception to policy * information paper * emails * website screen printout of her TEB request * excerpts...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000564
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report) for the rating period 20101204 through 20110508 (hereafter referred to as the contested OER) from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant provides: * Appeal packet to HRC * HRC's returned without action memorandum * Contested OER * Other OERs during her military service * Letters of recommendation for various officials * Relevant OPORDERS related to her duty performance COUNSEL'S REQUEST,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003223
But even if his records were coded educationally qualified for civilian education, with documents, there is no guarantee that he would have been selected for promotion. But even if his records were coded educationally qualified for civilian education, with documents, there is no guarantee that he would have been selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting his record to a...