Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000243
Original file (20150000243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000243 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his retirement rank/grade as specialist  (SPC)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)E-3.

2.  The applicant states he believes his rank should be changed because the suspension of favorable personnel actions code he received in 2012, which prevented him from being automatically promoted to SPC, had been removed prior to his medical retirement so he could be promoted before he medically retired.  However, because the date of the removal was so close to his retirement date, he was never promoted and all of his military records have his rank/grade listed as a PFC/E-3 instead of SPC/E-4. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 February 2011, in the rank/grade of private/E-2.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 31B (Military Police).

2.  His Enlisted Record Brief shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of PFC/E-3 on 1 September 2011.  His record is void of evidence showing he was promoted to the rank/grade of specialist/E-4.

3.  The complete facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's retirement are not available for review.  However, his record contains a duly-constituted       DD Form 214 which shows the applicant was medically retired due to permanent disability in the rank/grade of PFC/E-3 on 27 October 2013.

4.  During the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Department of the Army Promotions, U.S. Army Human Resources Command.  The advisory official stated after reviewing the applicant's available records the Junior Enlisted Promotions section indicated the applicant was flagged for a law enforcement investigation on 4 October 2013, and separated with the flag.  The applicant never regained his promotable status; therefore, he is not entitled to a promotion in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20g, retirement due to disability.

5.  On 9 March 2015, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 prescribes the policies and procedures governing the promotion and reduction of Army enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 1-20e (Promotion of Soldiers in the Disability Evaluation System) states in all cases, the Soldier must otherwise be fully eligible for promotion in accordance with paragraph 1–10 (Nonpromotable Status).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant provides insufficient evidence to support his claim that his flag had been removed prior to his medical retirement so he could be promoted.

2.  After reviewing the applicant's available records the Junior Enlisted Promotions section of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command indicated the applicant was flagged for a law enforcement investigation on 4 October 2013, and separated with the flag.  It appears the applicant never regained his promotable status; therefore, he was not eligible for promotion.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support the applicant's claim.    





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000243





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000243



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020402

    Original file (20130020402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * Enlisted Record Brief * DA Form 268 (Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Actions (FLAG)) * two Enlisted Promotion Reports * Memorandum for Record (MFR) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant received an overweight FLAG on 20 November 2012 (a FLAG, dated 18 October 2012, was removed due to being erroneous) for not being in compliance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008137

    Original file (20130008137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 13-106, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Enlisted Promotion Clarification for Soldiers in the Disability Evaluation System * Page 7 of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) * Headquarters and Headquarters Company, Infantry Training Support Brigade, Fort Benning, GA, Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel, dated 12 October 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Headquarters, U.S....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018532

    Original file (20120018532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 199 documenting the PEB Proceedings shows his rank as PFC at that time. (1) The advisory official stated the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 October 2008 for a $30,000.00 enlistment bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show 5 November as his anniversary date for the purpose of bonus installment payments and paying him the $4,000.00 bonus installment he would have been due on 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021246

    Original file (20130021246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show/add: * her rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3 * her date of rank (DOR) to SPC of 27 September 2013 * her net active service as 3 years, 6 months, and 21 days vice 3 years, 5 months, and 10 days * the Army Achievement Medal b. correction of her separation orders and discharge certificate to show her rank as SPC. The applicant provides: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017885

    Original file (20130017885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no record of her military contract to show she should have been on active duty when she was serving on active duty during the last year. A Corrected By Name List – Headquarters, Department of the Army, Monthly SGT/SSG Promotion Selection Name List, dated 28 June 2012, which shows her name listed as being qualified for promotion to SSG/E-6 on 1 July 2012. c. A DA Form 4856, dated 29 June 2012, which shows she received counseling for the initiation of an investigation after her chain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016992

    Original file (20130016992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his application he was in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), Fort Sam Houston, TX Memorandum for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 17 April 2013 * Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum for U.S. Army, Promotion Work Centers, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 May 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016491

    Original file (20140016491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired as a sergeant (SGT) in pay grade E-5. His record does not contain any documentation showing he was recommended for or promoted to SGT during his active duty service nor is there any record of NJP. In addition, he received a second flag effective 16 September 2013 for an adverse action which also made him ineligible for promotion consideration to SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003939

    Original file (20140003939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) by: a. revoking the DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 24 February 2012, which erroneously advanced him from the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 to the rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 and removing it from his AMHRR; b. amending the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code for Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 4 April 2012, to show he held the rank/grade of private first class...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000209

    Original file (20150000209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 effective 1 August 2013 and all back pay due as a result. The applicant provides: * four promotion point worksheets (PPW) – Unofficial Copy * an HRC memorandum, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 August 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active Army (AA) * a memorandum, subject: Request an Administrative Records Correction (ARC) for [Applicant], issued by Headquarters, 532nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001066

    Original file (20150001066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Soldiers flagged for adverse action will be reintegrated by the commander onto the recommended list if the case is closed favorably (provided otherwise qualified) without re-appearance before a promotion board. The applicant contends her record should be corrected to show she was promoted to the rank of SGT effective 1 April 2014 instead of 1 January 2015. The INSCOM IG's findings suggest the applicant's command failed to reintegrate her on the PSL as a result of incorrect information...