Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000234
Original file (20150000234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  19 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000234 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his education benefits to his eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  He is currently assigned to the Warrior Transition Battalion (WTB); however, he is on transitional leave and will be medically retired on 31 December 2014.  He transferred to the WTB in October 2013, after he had completed          6 years of active service and was eligible to transfer his education benefits based on qualifying time.

	b.  He immediately inquired about procedures to initiate the transfer of his education benefits via the Soldier and Family Assistance Center (SFAC) and the Soldier Assistance Center at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii.  He was told by both centers that he needed to wait until he had retirement orders and began the clearing process. 

	c.  His Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rating decision came back in July 2014.  At that time, he went back to the transition office at the Soldier Assistance Center to verify the procedures he needed to follow to transfer his education benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.  They informed him that their department would be one of the places he needed to clear once his orders were generated and he was going through the clearing process. 
	d.  He received his disability retirement orders in August 2014.  He began the clearing process and on 10 September 2014, he cleared the transition office at the Soldier Assistance Center – at which time the lady who assisted him initiated the request to transfer his education benefits. 

	e.  He is now being told that he is unable to transfer his education benefits because he has not committed to the required additional service time (service remaining requirement (SRR)).  This is completely unfair and not right.  He should not lose a benefit because he was given wrong information.  Had he been given the proper information when he went to the WTB, then he would have had the appropriate time to extend his service time before his retirement orders were cut in order to meet the criteria for transfer.

3.  The applicant provides two separate email message strings that document previous attempts to receive approval for an exception to policy to transfer his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 2007.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 92A (Automated Logistical Specialist).  The highest rank/grade he attained during his period of active military service was sergeant (SGT)/E-5. 

2.  He served in Iraq from 28 May 2008 to 10 November 2008 and in Afghanistan from 4 February 2010 to 6 February 2011. 

3.  On 2 October 2013, he was reassigned to the WTB, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii for completion of medical care.

4.  On 17 July 2014, a physical evaluation board (PEB) convened and found him medically unfit for service due to post-traumatic stress disorder, right shoulder pain status post repair, and inguinal hernia status post repair.  The PEB recommended a combined rating of 80 percent and temporary disability retirement.  He concurred with the board's findings and recommendation. 

5.  On 27 August 2014, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison – Hawaii, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii published Orders 239-0012, which released him from active duty effective 23 October 2014 and placed him on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) in his retired rank/grade of SGT/E-5, effective 24 October 2014.

6.   On 8 September 2014, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison – Hawaii, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii published Orders 251-0010, which amended Orders 239-0012 by changing the effective date of his release from active duty to 
30 December 2014, and by changing the effective date of his placement on the TDRL to 31 December 2014.

7.  On 30 December 2014, he was retired from the Army by reason of temporary disability.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 7 years, 2 months, and 27 days of active service during the period covered by the DD Form 214. 

8.  The applicant provides two separate email message strings that document previous attempts to receive approval for an exception to policy to transfer his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

9.  Public Law 110-252 establishes the legal requirements concerning the transferability of unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.

10.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members.  The policy limits the entitlement to transfer education benefits to any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009, who, at the time of the approval of his or her request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill; and: 

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election (emphasis added); or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute, or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served on active duty from 4 October 2007 to 30 December 2014, a period of 7 years, 2 months, and 27 days.  He was retired from the Army by reason of medical disability.
2.  It appears he attempted to obtain an exception to policy, prior to his retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependents.
It also appears he did not meet the eligibility criteria to transfer his education benefits, since at the time of his application, he had completed only 6 years (but not 10 years) of service in the Armed Forces.  Therefore, he would have been required to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of his election (SRR) and his request was contingent upon his extension or reenlistment to meet the SRR for eligibility.

3.  Since he was ineligible to extend or reenlist because of his pending medical retirement, he was ineligible to transfer his education benefits.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005002



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000234



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011496

    Original file (20130011496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his son. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013606

    Original file (20140013606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's two sons each used education benefits the applicant transferred to them under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer her educational benefits to her dependents under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to her retirement. She incurred an additional service obligation as a result of her approved request to transfer her education benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012034

    Original file (20110012034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents. With his request, he submitted his DD Form 2648, a letter from the VA, dated 4 June 2009, subject: Eligibility under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and his DA Forms 31 for Permissive TDY, covering the period 17 December 2009 through 13 January 2010. Prior to retirement, while still on active duty, he did not apply for the transfer of educational benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019514

    Original file (20130019514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his sons under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The Army did not have a record of his GI Bill. Records show the applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no convincing evidence showing he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002947

    Original file (20120002947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his educational benefits were transferred to his eligible dependents in a timely manner in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The available evidence shows he was eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012851

    Original file (20140012851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he transferred his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retiring from military service. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents because he was not properly counseled on TEB prior to his retirement from active duty. Thus, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004124

    Original file (20140004124.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Orders 041-073, issued by the OKARNG on 10 February 2010 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), for the period ending 1 November 2009 * Special Orders Number 27 AR, issued by the NGB on 17 February 2010 * an extract of his Master Military Pay Account (MMPA), as of 31 May 2010 * OKARNG Clothing Record, dated 20 October 2009 * ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), issued by the U.S. Army Human...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004124

    Original file (20140004124 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Orders 041-073, issued by the OKARNG on 10 February 2010 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), for the period ending 1 November 2009 * Special Orders Number 27 AR, issued by the NGB on 17 February 2010 * an extract of his Master Military Pay Account (MMPA), as of 31 May 2010 * OKARNG Clothing Record, dated 20 October 2009 * ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), issued by the U.S. Army Human...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010801

    Original file (20130010801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have been eligible to transfer the benefits if he transferred before he left military service. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members. The applicant was eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but he did not do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018165

    Original file (20140018165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Thus, the TEB Acknowledgements are not clear because they advise that the election can be modified at any time until educational benefits are exhausted; however, they do not provide information regarding the requirement to transfer at least 1 month of benefits to an eligible dependent upon enrollment. Therefore, as an exception to policy, it would be appropriate in this case to correct the applicant's military records to show he elected to transfer a portion of his benefits to his daughter...