Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000117
Original file (20150000117.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 August 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000117 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal or any other medals for his period of service.	

2.  The applicant states he served honorably, received an honorable discharge in 1962, and served in Germany during the period when the Berlin Wall was erected.

3.  The applicant provides DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 22 March 1962.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 23 January 1959, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  
3.  On 10 June 1960, he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 4th Training Regiment, U.S. Army Training Center, Engineer, Fort Leonard Wood, MO.  He received an efficiency rating of "good" for the period 10 June - 4 August 1960.

4.  On 13 August 1960, he was assigned to the 178th Engineer Company at Fort Belvoir, VA.  He was assigned to the 178th Engineer Company in Germany from 6 October 1961 - 22 March 1962. 

5.  On 22 March 1962, he was released from active duty.  He completed 3 years and 2 months of active service that was characterized as honorable.  His 
DD Form 214 does not show he received any awards.

6.  The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

7.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Records do not show indiscipline or lost time.  His records do not contain any adverse information.  The applicant received an efficiency rating of "good" during training at Fort Leonard Wood.  He received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" or "unknown" throughout his remaining service.

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period from 
1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's records do not show indiscipline, lost time, or a record of courts-martial.  He received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service with the exception of a "good" efficiency rating while attending a service school.  There is no record of a commander's disqualification.  There is sufficient evidence to show the applicant was eligible for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of qualifying service from 
23 January 1959 - 22 January 1962.  

2.  His service from 23 January 1959 - 22 March 1962 qualifies him for the National Defense Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for honorable service from 23 January 1959 to 22 January 1962; and

	b.  adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 22 March 1962:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award)
* National Defense Service Medal




      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000117





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000117



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018123

    Original file (20140018123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show his medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005933

    Original file (20120005933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his DA Form 24 (Service Record) and DD Form 214. With respect to the Army Good Conduct Medal, the evidence of record shows the applicant received "good" efficiency and conduct ratings during training at Fort Leonard Wood, MO in 1958.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018560

    Original file (20110018560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to reflect awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Badge with rifle bar and any other awards to which he is entitled. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected by awarding the FSM the AGCM (1st Award) and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017014

    Original file (20110017014.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * Special Order Number 296, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, dated 23 October 1967, awarded him Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) * he was assigned to the 19th Engineer Battalion, 137th Combat Engineers, while he was in Vietnam which was awarded the Valorous Unit Award 3. His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002137

    Original file (20120002137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show: a. completion of the Fixed Wing Multi-Engine Aircraft Maintenance course and the OV-1 Mohawk Twin Engine Turboprop Maintenance course, in addition to the Single Rotor Observation Helicopter Maintenance Course (a request for reconsideration); b. his height as 5 foot, 8 inches (a request for reconsideration); c. award of the Good Conduct Medal and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge (new...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002236

    Original file (20120002236.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active enlisted service. He served a qualifying period of service and should be entitled to this award and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. His file contains no information that would have disqualified him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award); therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020328

    Original file (20090020328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960). The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 16 April 1969. Evidence shows the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the RVN Campaign Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018983

    Original file (20080018983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The governing regulation, in effect at the time, required that a member meet all specified regulatory criteria in order to be awarded the AGCM, which included that he receive all "Excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during all assignment periods.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009113

    Original file (20080009113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, Item 38 (Record of Assignment) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant’s conduct and efficiency ratings were “Excellent” throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017810

    Original file (20090017810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be provided a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) to show all of medals he is entitled to receive to include the Bronze Star Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The Board also recommends that all Department of...