Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000014
Original file (20150000014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	   25 June 2015 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000014 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her 3 September 2014 U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) reenlistment be voided.

2.  The applicant states she was unaware that she was not eligible for the bonus when she reenlisted.  She was still serving her statutory obligation and it was not mandatory for her to reenlist.  Because there was a bonus control number she thought she would receive a bonus.  Subsequent to her reenlistment it was determined that she was an unsatisfactory participant and therefore ineligible to reenlist for the bonus.

3.  The applicant provides her personal 5 October 2014 statement, her DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), Statement of Understanding-The Montgomery GI Bill Selected Reserve, Selected Reserve Incentive Program-Enlistment Bonus Addendum, her DA Form 4/2 Certification and Acceptance, her DA Form 3640 Annex A, and USAR Reenlistment Bonus Written Agreement (Certificate and Acknowledgement of USAR Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment.)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 12 August 2008, the applicant enlisted in the USAR and incurred an 
8-year obligation with a 6-year commitment for active participation in a troop program unit.

2.  She completed basic and advanced individual training and progressed to pay grade E-4.

3.  On 3 September 2014, she reenlisted for 6 years to continue her membership in the USAR.  The USAR Reenlistment Bonus Written Agreement contained, in Section III –Acknowledgement, item 6 the following statement, “I have been a satisfactory participant in the Selected Reserve unit for the 3 months preceding this reenlistment by attending all scheduled assemblies and satisfactorily  completing the entire period of annual training, unless excused by competent authority.” 

4.  During the processing of this case a 12 March 2015 Memorandum for the Board was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (G-1).  The Reserve Incentives Program Manager observed that:

   a.  the applicant was determined to be an unsatisfactory participant and therefore ineligible for a reenlistment bonus;
   
   b.  despite the fact that she knew or should have known that she was a unsatisfactory participant she signed the reenlistment agreement claiming that she was a satisfactory participant; and 
   
   c.  the request to void the contract should be denied because no evidence was available to show that the applicant’s unit had addressed the issue or the possibility that she had been mistakenly identified as an unsatisfactory participant.
   
5.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal.  No response was received.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states that because she was determined to be an unsatisfactory participant she was ineligible for a bonus and asks that her reenlistment be voided. 

2.  Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (COS) determined she was unsatisfactory participant.  She provides no evidence to say otherwise.  





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X`______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000014



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000014



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013187

    Original file (20140013187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 23 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140013187 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Section VII (Termination) of the SLRP Addendum contains her acknowledgement of her understanding, in part, that the terms of her SLRP agreement and her entitlement to loan repayment under the SLRP would be terminated should she become an unsatisfactory participant per Army Regulation 135-91...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016376

    Original file (20140016376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    g. The ETP denial further stated she was still under contract obligation for a ROTC scholarship when she signed the OAB agreement. The applicant became a MILTECH after serving al least 1 day of the contract term she signed an agreement for the OAB while on the SMP scholarship, and her OAB addendum was signed after the commissioned date, all of which were not authorized and violated the ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06, updated, 1 March 2009 to 15 June 2010. b. She did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000820

    Original file (20130000820.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section V (Termination) of this form states, in part, "I understand I will be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment (unless otherwise stated) if I become an unsatisfactory participant by [a]ccept a commission as an officer or an appointment as a warrant officer after I have served 1 year or more of Selected Reserve service under this agreement. The applicant was commissioned in the DCARNG on 17 September 2009 for the OAB in critical AOC 88A. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015211

    Original file (20140015211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he enlisted in the Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) on 10 December 2008 and that Section VI (Remarks) of his DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) reflects his acceptance of both the Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) and the SLRP in conjunction with his enlistment. He attests that although SLRP documents were completed at the time of his enlistment and bonus control numbers were requested, they were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005411

    Original file (20090005411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 5 November 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005411 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was eligible for an Enlisted Affiliation Bonus (EAB) in connection with his 6 December 2008 reenlistment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The evidence of record confirms the applicant did not satisfactorily complete a qualifying active duty tour prior to reenlisting for the affiliation bonus in question.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017989

    Original file (20140017989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reinstatement of his entitlement to the Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) and Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) he contracted for in his initial enlistment on 8 August 1994. The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), dated 8 August 1994 * an undated U.S. Military Entrance Processing Command (USMEPCOM) Form 601-23-4 (Restrictions on Personal Conduct in the Armed Forces) * DA Form 3540...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019183

    Original file (20130019183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum published by NGB on 26 September 2012, Subject: Announcement of Approved Exception to Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1205.21, RC Incentives Program Procedures, paragraph 5b states PAs are eligible for Special Pay Bonus in the amount of $15,000 per year. She signed another contract for the Special Pay Bonus for $20,000 per year and then another contract for $15,000 per year. The applicant was not eligible to contract for the incentive until the ETP list was approved.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022206

    Original file (20130022206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion recommended approval for reinstatement of the applicant's SLRP due to the following: * the applicant reenlisted on 10 December 2009 and executed a contract addendum to receive the SLRP incentive * the contract extended her ETS from 4 December 2012 to 10 December 2015 * she received her annual loan repayments in 2010 and 2011 * she accepted a military technician position on 7 October 2012 * she was denied an annual loan repayment in 2012 * NGB denied her request for ETP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023334

    Original file (20100023334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. to void his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) reenlistment contract executed on 18 February 2009 which would revert to the terms of his previous USAR reenlistment contract executed on 23 October 2006 or b. to honor the $15,000.00 Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) bonus associated with the contract executed on 18 February 2009 and paying him all due monies as a result of entering this contract. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014088

    Original file (20140014088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to the $50,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that she contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Records show the applicant enlisted in the ARNGUS/GAARNG (RFP in an ING status), on 30 June 2011, for a period of 1 year in MOS 12K and her enlistment agreement included the SLRP. The evidence of record also shows the NGB decision to deny the applicant's SLRP was based on her...