Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021470
Original file (20140021470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140021470 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests transfer of the remaining 7 months of his GI Bill education benefits to his youngest child.

2.  The applicant states that he allocated his 36 months of GI Bill benefits to his oldest child in 2009 and did not allocate any to his youngest child prior to his retirement as he was not aware that he had to do so before retirement. However, when he subsequently tried to reallocate the remainder of his benefits he was informed that he had to do so before he retired.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was commissioned as a United States Army Reserve infantry second lieutenant on 20 May 1983 and was ordered to active duty on 15 September 1985.  He remained on active duty and was promoted to the rank of colonel in the Regular Army on 1 May 2007.

2.  On 30 November 2012, he was retired by reason of sufficient service for retirement.  He had served 27 years, 2 months and 19 days of active service.

3.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 is described under Title V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, Public Law
110-252, House of Representatives, 2642.  In July of 2008, Congress passed a law for the Post-9/11 GI Bill that went into effect on 1 August 2009.
4.  Public Law 110-252 and Department of the Army, G1 Post 9/11 GI Bill Policy dated 10 July 2009, provides that a veteran may modify entitlements or revoke entitlements among only those dependents that were designated to receive transferred benefits prior to separating from the Armed Forces.  Veterans who transferred entitlements prior to separation or retirement from the Armed Forces may not add new family members after separation or retirement. 
 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was not informed that he had to add the beneficiaries of his G.I. Bill benefits while he was on active duty  is not in doubt, he has failed to show through the evidence of record or the evidence submitted with his application that such was the case. 

2.  The laws and policies governing the TEB provide that family members may not be added after separation or retirement.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was improperly informed at the time he made his initial election that he could add family members after his retirement, there appears to be no error or injustice in his case.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x_____  ___x____ DENY APPLICATION









BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021470





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021470



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004799

    Original file (20140004799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer his education benefits under the TEB on 29 October 2009, which is within 90 days of the implementation of the program. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct his records to show he transferred the remaining balance of his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB Program to his youngest son. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000824

    Original file (20140000824 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, the evidence of record shows that, for whatever reason, he only transferred the benefits to his wife; he did not transfer any educational benefits in the TEB online database to either of his daughters. He has not provided sufficient evidence to show he added all of his eligible dependent's into the TEB database prior to or at the time of retirement and allocated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000824

    Original file (20140000824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, the evidence of record shows that, for whatever reason, he only transferred the benefits to his wife; he did not transfer any educational benefits in the TEB online database to either of his daughters. He has not provided sufficient evidence to show he added all of his eligible dependent's into the TEB database prior to or at the time of retirement and allocated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009844

    Original file (20120009844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval to transfer 1 month of her educational benefits to two additional dependent children, J____ M____ and A____ M____, under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 April 2010. It is apparent she was aware of the requirement to request TEB through the DOD TEB online database prior to her transfer to the Retired Reserve as she transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008780

    Original file (20130008780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to transfer education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer benefits to eligible children. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer benefits to his eligible dependents; however, based on his own...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003101

    Original file (20120003101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory opinion stated that on 22 June 2009 Department of Defense (DOD) guidance established the eligibility criteria for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. The Soldier...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000223

    Original file (20150000223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * there is not much he can give his children who followed him during their growing-up years and had to be uprooted during high school because he was again being transferred * receiving the educational benefits is one small way he can demonstrate his appreciation for the sacrifices they made during his career * he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents at the time it was first authorized in June 2009 because he already had a master's degree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010867

    Original file (20130010867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his dependent daughter (Megan) is 22 years old, permanently disabled, totally dependent on others for her self-care, and she will not be able to use any further educational benefits. Because it appears the applicant erroneously requested transfer of benefits to his daughter Megan, who was severely incapacitated, it would be appropriate in this case to correct the applicant's military records to show he elected to transfer a portion of his benefits to his daughter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004420

    Original file (20110004420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his eligible family members were listed in the official Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) online database and to transfer his GI Bill educational benefits to his eligible family members under the Post 9/11 GI Bill transferability option. The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant was a member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty on or after 1 August 2009; b. he had at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010903

    Original file (20120010903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252 also established the legal requirements for the transferability of unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The applicant's last day of service with the Army National Guard was 31 January 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 31 January 2011. As the applicant failed to transfer the benefits to his son while...