Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021412
Original file (20140021412.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  21 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140021412 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show a "precise form" for character of service for his under honorable conditions discharge.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 February 1983.  He held military occupational specialty 46N (Pershing Electrical Mechanical Repairer).  

3.  On 29 January 1991, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against his in accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for misconduct.  He cited the applicant's field grade nonjudicial punishments (NJP), under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for operating a motor vehicle while drunk on 1 November 1990 and for drunk driving on 22 July 1989.  He recommended a general discharge.

4.  The applicant acknowledged receipt of the commander's intent to separate him.  He subsequently consulted with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action for misconduct, the type of discharge he could receive, the possible effects of this discharge, and the procedures and rights available to his.  He further indicated he understood he could expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a general discharge under honorable conditions were issued to his and he could be ineligible for many or all benefits as a veteran under Federal and State laws as a result of the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. He waived consideration of his case by a board of officers and personal appearance before the board contingent upon his receiving a characterization of service or description of separation no less than General under honorable conditions.  He indicated he would submit a statement on his own behalf. 

5.  Subsequent to this acknowledgement, the immediate commander initiated separation action against his under the provisions of paragraph 14-12b of AR 635-200.  The commander listed the applicant's record of disciplinary action including two Field Grade NJPs.

7.  Consistent with the chain of command's recommendations, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge and directed issuance of a General Discharge Certificate.  

8.  The applicant was accordingly discharged on 20 February 1991 for misconduct.  He had completed 8 years and 6 days of active duty service.  His DD Form 214 shows in item 24, "Under Honorable Conditions." 

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  The regulation shows for item 24 that characterization or description of service is determined by directives authorizing separation.  Proper completion of this block is vital since it affects the Soldier's eligibility for post-service benefits.  Only six standard characterizations in this block are authorized:

	a.  Honorable.

	b.  Under Honorable Conditions (General).

	c.  Under Other than Honorable Conditions.

	d.  Bad Conduct.

	e.  Dishonorable.

	f,  Uncharacterized.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests a more precise entry in item 24 of his DD Form 214.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged for misconduct under the provisions of AR 625-200, chapter 14.  The separation authority directed issuance of a General Discharge Certificate.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows in item 24, "Under Honorable Conditions."

3.  The governing regulation shows the correct entry in item 24 for a general discharge is "Under Honorable Conditions (General)."

4.  The applicant's request should be granted and his DD Form 214 changed accordingly.




BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all 
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry in item 24 of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with, " Under Honorable Conditions (General)."



      ______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003188



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021412



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003015

    Original file (20070003015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows, at the time of the applicant’s separation from active duty, the instructions for recording entries in Item 12 (Description – Race) of the DD Form 214 state to enter the Race precisely as shown on the enlistment record filed with the Service Record. The applicant’s military Service Record is not available to the Board. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the applicant’s Race (i.e., being recorded as Black);...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004002

    Original file (20110004002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 November 1982, consistent with the chain of command's recommendations and a review for legal sufficiency, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge action under the provisions of chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200, due to alcohol abuse –rehabilitation failure, and directed the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The evidence of record shows the applicant suffered...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017113

    Original file (20110017113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 September 1974 should be corrected to show this unit award. The applicant completed two periods of enlistment and he was issued a DD Form 214 upon the completion of each period of service. Although records show he continued to serve in the Republic of Vietnam in February 1970, as supported by his Air Medal order, his record does not contain the specific dates of service in the Republic of Vietnam during the period covered by his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017829

    Original file (20100017829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 February 1983, the applicant's unit commander informed the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11 (Trainee Discharge Program), by reason of entry-level status (ELS) performance and conduct. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Therefore, since his Honorable Discharge Certificate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021601

    Original file (20110021601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged under honorable conditions (a general discharge) on 30 March 2000 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for misconduct (pattern of misconduct). Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from active duty. The letters submitted on behalf of the applicant fail to show his discharge was unjust and should be upgraded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020864

    Original file (20100020864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 January 1992, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct - pattern of misconduct and directed the issuance of a general discharge. The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of misconduct - pattern of misconduct with a general discharge under honorable conditions. There is no indication in his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006996

    Original file (20090006996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The commander cited as the reasons for the discharge alcohol abuse, rehabilitative failure at ADAPCP, and for being drunk and disorderly on 5 November 1988. On 24 January 1989, the appropriate separation authority directed the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003527

    Original file (20110003527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Honorable" instead of "Uncharacterized" and issuance of a new DD Form 214 to show this correction. The regulation states that if a Soldier is in an entry level status (ELS) at the time of PDES processing the DD Form 214 will describe service as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020152

    Original file (20120020152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 1 July 1988, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024303

    Original file (20110024303.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant's substandard performance of duty and misconduct; no evidence is provided to show otherwise. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing her DD Form 214 to show she was transferred to the Retired Reserve with an honorable discharge.