Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021288
Original file (20140021288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140021288


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing he was authorized the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM).

2.  The applicant states he actively served in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from 1986 to March 1992, which was a qualifying period for award of the NDSM.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* Orders D-03-426151, USAR Personnel Center, dated 29 March 1994
* DARP Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), prepared 9 June 1995

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 24 March 1986, the applicant entered the USAR as an enlisted Soldier.

3.  Orders 7-21, 3220th U.S. Army Garrison, dated 18 July 1990, assigned the applicant to Battery C, 7th Troop, 9th Field Artillery, USAR.  He was assigned for duty in military occupational specialty 76C, as a "PLL" clerk.

4.  DARP Form 249-E, prepared 9 June 1995, indicates that the applicant received 17 active duty points for USAR service between 24 March 1991 and 
23 March 1992.

5.  Orders 024-018, 81st USAR Command, dated 21 February 1992, reassigned the applicant to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) effective 23 March 1992.

6.  Orders D-03-426151, USAR Personnel Center, dated 29 March 1994, honorably discharged the applicant effective that same day.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: 

	a.  Service medals and service ribbons are administratively awarded to individuals who meet the qualifying criteria.  Orders are not required.

	b.  The NDSM is awarded for honorable active service for specified periods.  Executive Order 12776 extended award of the NDSM to all members of the USAR who were part of the Selected Reserve in good standing during the period 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995.  Members of other than the Selected Reserve who were called to active duty were also eligible.

8.  Service medals and awards are not issued by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).  However, the applicant may obtain his medals by submitting his request in writing to:  National Personnel Records Center, ATTN: Army Reference Branch, 1 Archives Drive, St. Louis, Missouri  63138.  This issue will not be further addressed in this Record of Proceedings.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by showing he was authorized the NDSM for his active USAR service from 1986 to March 1992.

2.  The available evidence shows that the applicant honorably served in an active status during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM.  Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this medal.



BOARD VOTE:

____X____  __X______  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing an appropriate document indicating that the applicant is authorized to receive and wear the National Defense Service Medal for his honorable service between 1990 and 1992 as an active member of the USAR.




      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020180



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021288


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024493

    Original file (20100024493.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests documents be added to her official military personnel file (OMPF). USAR Personnel Center Permanent Orders 52-2, dated 16 April 1993, awarded her the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active military service for the period 29 December 1986 through 28 December 1989. The following documents/forms are filed in her OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022074

    Original file (20100022074.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests: * correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (DARP) Form 249 (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) to reflect the highest grade she attained was first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2 * correction of her DD Form 214 to reflect she was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and she was appointed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005303

    Original file (20090005303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). She specifically requests that her DA Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) be corrected to show extension course points for the following retirement years: a. retirement year ending (RYE) 28 September 1992, 47 points; b. RYE 28 September 1993, 36 points; and c. RYE 28 September 1994, 38.5 points. The applicant provides an ARPC Form 249-2-E, dated 7 March 2003, which shows she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019555

    Original file (20090019555.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records show she enlisted in the USAR on 8 May 1984 for a period of 6 years. Item 2 (SSN) of her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States) shows her SSN as xxx-xx-6605. The applicant's enlistment document, orders for IADT and ADT, DARP Form 249, DD Form 214, and additional records throughout her military personnel record identify her with the SSN xxx-xx-6605.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017300

    Original file (20090017300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 13 May 1991 to show the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was properly released from active duty on 13 May 1991 in the rank and grade of SPC/E-4. On 13 May 1991, she was released from active duty and issued a DD Form 214 showing her rank and pay grade as SPC/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018448

    Original file (20090018448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that if his 135 active duty points were not "stacked" in the RYE 8 January 1983, he would have more than enough qualifying years for retirement pay. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show an administrative error in the assignment of these active duty points. The applicant had 18 years of qualifying service when he was transferred to the Retired Reserve by reason of having reached the maximum allowable age.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013210

    Original file (20140013210.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier request for correction of the following documents to show her rank and grade as major (MAJ)/O-4 instead of captain (CPT)/O-3: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 November 1982 * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 6 October 1994 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 6 October 1994 * USAR Personnel Center (DARP) Form 249-2-E (Chronological Statement of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026871

    Original file (20100026871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), provides, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined. Beginning on 28 March 1995, the period of qualifying service for award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal was reduced from 4 to 3 years. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003818C070206

    Original file (20050003818C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his National Guard service was from March 1981 to December 1992 with a few breaks in active Army Reserve. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 2 August 1990 to 25 November 1995. Therefore, the evidence does not justify correcting his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005359

    Original file (20090005359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This same statement shows the applicant had 8 years of qualifying service for nonregular retirement with 1,815 creditable points. The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed eight qualifying years for nonregular retirement with four years credited for his active duty service. In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient basis to grant the applicant's request to correct his record to show 20 years of qualifying service for nonregular retirement.