IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 4 August 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140021273
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his characterization of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that during basic training he developed left foot problems, but the drill instructors discouraged him from seeking medical treatment. During advanced individual training (AIT) his foot gave out on him and he was diagnosed as suffering from plantar fasciitis. He was told that a medical separation would take 10 months to complete and he would be assigned odd jobs, because he was on a Naval base. He was told that if he accepted a discharge under chapter 11 he could be released in less than 2 months and the discharge would be honorable. However, he has been told the nature of his discharge is the reason he is not eligible for a Department of Veterans Affairs loan.
3. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and his separation examination.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant served on active duty from 27 November 1995 through 7 May 1996 without completing the training to be awarded a military occupational specialty (MOS).
3. On 28 March 1996, the applicant was afforded a psychological evaluation. The applicant was diagnosed as suffering from an adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features. The psychological consultation report shows the applicant stated he did not feel he was able to adapt to military life and he was not motivated for further service. Administrative separation was strongly recommended.
4. A general counseling statement, dated 4 April 1996, states the applicant requested to terminate his enlistment because of his inability to overcome the transition from civilian to military life. The applicant was notified that he was being recommended for separation under the provisions of chapter 11 at this time.
5. On 22 April 1996, the applicant's chain of command initiated formal separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the separation recommendation and declined to exercise any of his administrative rights.
6. The discharge authority approved the discharge action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, and directed the applicant be issued an uncharacterized discharge certificate.
7. The applicant was discharged on 7 May 1996 with 5 months and 11 days of creditable service. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged for entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation.
8. Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers) provides the following that the character of service for administrative separations is a determination reflecting a Soldier's military behavior and performance of duty during a specific period of service. There are three characterizations: Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), and under Other Than Honorable Conditions. A Soldier's service in an entry level status is normally described as uncharacterized, which is when a discharge action is initiated prior to a Soldier completing 180 days.
9. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It states:
a. An honorable discharge (HD) is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization of service is appropriate when the quality of the Soldiers service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty.
b. A general discharge (GD) is a separation under honorable conditions issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not so meritorious as to warrant an HD.
c. An uncharacterized separation is an entry-level separation with service uncharacterized if the separation processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry-level status, except when:
(1) Characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case.
(2) When it is determined the characterization of service as honorable is clearly warranted by the presence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance of duty.
(3) The Soldier being separated has more than 180 days of continuous active military service, has completed initial active duty training (IADT), has been awarded an MOS, and has reported for duty at a follow-on (active duty) unit.
d. Chapter 11, of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided, for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status. This provision of regulation applies to individuals who have demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline for military service, or that they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service. The separation policy applies to Soldiers who cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline. The regulation requires uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was discharged with less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. He had not completed IADT, he had not been awarded an MOS, and he had not reported for duty at a follow-on unit. His service is devoid of any unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance of duty warranting an honorable characterization of service.
2. The applicants discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with laws and regulations applicable at the time. The uncharacterized determination is commensurate with the applicant's limited overall record of military service.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ____X____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ __X_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140021273
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140021273
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010824
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he received an honorable or a general discharge instead of an uncharacterized discharge. Subsequent to the applicant's acknowledgement and consultation with counsel, his immediate commander initiated separation action against him in accordance with chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of lack of attitude and motivation to successfully complete the Soldierization process and meet graduation requirements...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013528
On 9 March 1983, the applicant's commander notified the applicant that he was recommending that he be separated from the service under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, Trainee Discharge Program (TDP), due to a lack of physical aptitude. This regulation was revised effective 1 October 1982 to delete the expeditious discharge program and provide for an uncharacterized separation for Soldiers separated with 180 days or less of continuous service. The applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010017
A DA Form 4856-R, dated 30 June 1983, states the applicant was again counseled by SSG M____ about being recycled or being discharged. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 11-3a, Entry Level Status Performance and Conduct (Trainee Discharge Program) with uncharacterized service. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides in pertinent part, that a separation will be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004212
The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that she was discharged by reason of physical disability. The medical treatment documents provided by the applicant show she continued to seek medical attention for her ankle and leg pain on 16 and 23 July and on 26 July was prescribed a medical shoe in addition to continued use of ibuprofen. On 25 October 2004 the applicants unit commander informed the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018927
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for missing two toes on his right foot, which is not disqualifying for enlistment IAW AR 40-501, paragraph 2-10b, if function of the foot is not impaired. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025501
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 25 April 1983, the applicants unit commander initiated action to separate her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, for entry level status performance and conduct. The commander cited: * her inability to meet the standards of military training * poor duty performance and attitude toward military service 5.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001698
On 27 September 1997, her commander notified her he was initiating action to effect her elimination from the Army prior to the expiration of her current term of service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations, Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, due to a lack of motivation/failure to meet Army physical fitness standards. Accordingly, on 31 October 1997, she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 by reason of entry performance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001698
On 27 September 1997, her commander notified her he was initiating action to effect her elimination from the Army prior to the expiration of her current term of service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations, Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, due to a lack of motivation/failure to meet Army physical fitness standards. Accordingly, on 31 October 1997, she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 by reason of entry performance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004129
The applicant requests that the characterization of service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. On 7 March 1986, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army in accordance with chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized discharge. His separation code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000894
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to upgrade his uncharacterized characterization of service to honorable. His record contains two DA Forms 4856 (General Counseling Form), dated 19 August 1991 and 21 August 1991, which show he was counseled for: * being AWOL from 2 June 1991 to 1 July 1991 * initiation of separation proceedings in accordance with (IAW) Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 11 (Entry...