Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021171
Original file (20140021171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140021171 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 26 days of foreign service.

2.  The applicant states:

* item 22 of his DD Form 214 shows 10 months and 26 days of foreign service
* the entry should read 1 year, 10 months, and 26 days
* he served with Company B, Long Lines Battalion North, U.S. Army Strategic Command, in Korea during this period
* the minimum tour of duty in Korea was 13 months
* he extended his tour for the 5-month early release for hardship tour

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 August 1968 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 84G (photographic laboratory operations specialist).

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) credited him with service in Korea from 21 April 1969 through 15 March 1971 (1 year, 10 months, and 23 days).  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 also shows he departed Korea en route to the continental United States on 15 March 1971.

4.  On 16 March 1971, he was honorably released from active duty.

5.  Item 22c of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 10 months and 26 days of foreign service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Item 31 of his DA Form 20 shows he served in Korea from 21 April 1969 through 15 March 1971 for a total of 1 year, 10 months, and 23 days of foreign service.  Therefore, the entry in item 31 of his DA Form 20 is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base amending item 22c of his DD Form 214 to show he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 23 days of foreign service.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the current entry in item 22c of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry "1  10  23."

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending item 22c of his DD Form 214 to show he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 26 days of foreign service.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021171



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021171



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011344

    Original file (20130011344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "V – 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013351

    Original file (20110013351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22c of the DD Form 214 issued on 24 November 1971 shows 2 years, 4 months, and 19 days of foreign service and shows he served with U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV). The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two DD Forms 214. The applicant is advised that he must present both of his DD Forms 214 and any associated DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) when he is required to provide documentation of his RA service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006754

    Original file (20110006754.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 25 November 1970 through 24 November 1971, a period of 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 22c of the applicant's DD Form 214 the entry "0 8 1" and replacing it with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018148

    Original file (20080018148.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 20 June 1966 for 4 years. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his DD Form 214, dated 25 November 1969, item 22c, should be corrected to show a credit of 2 years, 4 months, and 26 days foreign service and USARPAC/Korea should be entered to correctly show the last theater and country in which the applicant served. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070007878C071029

    Original file (AR20070007878C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his service in Korea and the dates that he served in Korea be included on his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214). In the statement that the applicant submits in support of his application, he indicates that after his tour in Korea, he was transferred from the United States Army to the USAR on 6 August 1971 and that he was a member of the USAR until he volunteered to go to Vietnam. His DD Form 214 was prepared to reflect his active duty service from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103

    Original file (20130002103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028938

    Original file (20100028938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 January 1971. Evidence shows he served in Korea in 1964/1965 which is properly shown on his DA Form 20 and in item 24c of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 March 1965. Evidence shows he served in Germany in 1972/1973 which is properly shown on his DA Form 20 and in item 24c of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 January 1974.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003891

    Original file (20120003891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period 26 January 1970 through 19 January 1973 to show he served in Vietnam. Army Regulation 635-5, dated 23 January 1967, (and subsequent changes or amendments) in effect at the time of the applicant's separation in July 1969 stated: * In item 22c, for enlisted personnel show the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011067

    Original file (20090011067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 January 1973 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 11d (Effective Date) shows the entry "26 Aug 69"; c. Item 22 (Statement of Service) shows the following entries: (1) Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows "3 1 0"; (2) Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows "0 6 15"; (3) Item 22a(3) (Total) shows "3 7 15"; (4) Item 22b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017545

    Original file (20070017545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and DA Form 20. The regulation, in effect at the time, provided that the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed would be entered in item 22c. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.