IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 September 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140020925
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and Meritorious Service Medal (MSM).
2. The applicant states she was awarded the ARCOM at her promotion to E-3 and the MSM at her promotion to E-4 while serving at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as the clerk in the Department of Nursing, but they are not listed on her DD Form 214.
3. The applicant provides her DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's military records are not available for review. The National Personnel Records Center search failed to locate her service records. Her request is being considered based on the DD Form 214 she provided.
3. Her DD Form 214 shows she enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 August 1983 and trained as an administrative specialist. She was honorably released from active duty for expiration term of service and under the Fiscal Year 1986 Early Release Program on 24 June 1986. Her rank is shown as specialist four/E-4 effective 1 November 1984.
4. Her DD Form 214 does not show the MSM or ARCOM as authorized awards.
5. She did not provide copies of certificates or orders awarding her the MSM or ARCOM.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.
a. The MSM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States or of a friendly foreign nation who distinguish themselves by outstanding meritorious achievement or service. After 16 January 1969 but prior to 11 September 2001, the MSM was authorized to be awarded only for meritorious service or achievement while serving in a non-combat area. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
b. The ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicant contends she was awarded the MSM and ARCOM, there is no evidence of record and she provided no evidence to support this contention.
2. Since there are no available orders awarding her the MSM and ARCOM, there is insufficient evidence on which to base adding these awards to her DD Form 214 at this time.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ____x___ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140020925
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140020925
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019071
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 October 2006 to show the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (6th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (4th Award) * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) 2. Her record contains two orders and she provided two additional orders showing she was awarded a total of four ARCOMs. Her record also contains...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357
The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013371
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (2nd Award). The applicant states: a. all of his awards were not listed on his DD Form 214; and b. his commander was going to initiate a request for the Meritorious Service Medal after Desert Storm. An undated DA Form 638-1 shows the applicant's commander recommended him for the MSM for meritorious service during the period 17 December 1988 to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011206 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (First Oak Leaf...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005313
On 3 September 2002, a subordinate officer (second lieutenant) submitted a Recommendation for Award (DA Form 638) recommending the applicant for award of the BSM for meritorious service during the period of 1 July to 1 October 2002. The company and battalion commanders recommended approval of the MSM; however, the group commander (colonel) downgraded the award to award of the ARCOM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states it is the responsibility of any individual having personal knowledge of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012259
Records show that the applicant appealed to the US Army Human Resources Command-Military Awards Branch for upgrade of his ARCOM to a MSM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. The applicant's records clearly show...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004532
Records show that permanent orders awarded the applicant the MSM for the period 1 October 2002 to 30 September 2012. The evidence of record shows that the applicant received two awards of the ARCOM. The DA Form 638 that recommended her for award of the MSM does not show she was awarded an interim award (i.e., the ARCOM) and, in fact, shows that she had previously been awarded the ARCOM (2nd Award).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018221
The applicant requests, in effect, his Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) awarded on 17 June 2011 be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicant provides: * self-authored statements * ARCOM Certificate * DA Form 638-1 (Recommendation for Award) * emails * memorandum for record, dated 22 June 2011 * letter, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, dated 13 July 2011 * Orders Number 196-2220, Headquarters, U.S. Army Maneuver Center of Excellence, Fort Benning, GA, dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105768C070208
The applicant's military record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 July 1990. The available evidence shows that, on 10 February 1997, the applicant was recommended for award of the MSM for the period of service from 22 July 1994 to 1 June 1997. The applicant's DD Form 214, issued on 16 April 1998 shows award of both the MSM and the ARCOM for the same period of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013921
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), two awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and one award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board. It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.