Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020792
Original file (20140020792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020792 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to honorable.

2.  He states he was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and failure to register a weapon.  He adds he is truly remorseful for this foolish act.  He maintains his goal in life was to serve 20 years in the military.  He concludes that he has been a model citizen since his discharge and has furthered his career as a pharmacy technician and a licensed vocational nurse.

3.  He does not provide any additional evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 June 1981 for a period of
4 years.  On 15 May 1985, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years.   

3.  On 31 August 1990, he was convicted by a general court-martial of wrongfully failing to register his privately owned firearm within three duty days after storing the firearm on Fort Hood, TX, and unlawfully killing his spouse with a pistol.  The court sentenced him to reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement for 2 years, and a BCD.  On 30 September 1991, his sentence was affirmed and the BCD ordered executed.

4.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged with a BCD on 21 October 1991.  He was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, "as a result of court-martial."  He completed 8 years, 11 months, and 17 days of creditable active service with the period 
27 May 1990 to 14 May 1991 listed as lost time.
	
5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 3 establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable discharge or BCD.  It provides that a Soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial.  The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence must be ordered duly executed.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	c.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

6.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or as modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather, it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was given a BCD pursuant to an approved sentence of a general court-martial.  The appellate review was completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected.

2.  Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.  Absent any mitigating factors, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate.  As a result, clemency is not warranted in this case.

3.  The fact that he has been a model citizen since his discharge is commendable.  However, good post-service conduct alone is not a sufficient basis in this case for upgrading his discharge.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020792





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020792



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026697

    Original file (20100026697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to an under other than honorable conditions discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027104

    Original file (20100027104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 27 March 1990, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of court-martial with a BCD. On 23 April 1997, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), after careful consideration of the applicant's military record, and all other available evidence, determined the applicant's discharged was proper and equitable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003203

    Original file (20150003203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to general under honorable conditions. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014641

    Original file (20110014641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. Accordingly, his punishment was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002759

    Original file (20150002759.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002759 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD). His sincerity is not in question; however, there is no evidence in the record nor did he provide evidence to support clemency.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000876

    Original file (20130000876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to an other than honorable discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a GCM and he received a BCD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000285

    Original file (20100000285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009859

    Original file (AR20140009859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 January 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140009859 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to honorable. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a GCM and he received a BCD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006340

    Original file (20090006340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that he served for over 10 years and gave his all. He claims his goal was to retire as an Army Soldier and he is deeply sorry to the Nation, the Army and his family for his foolish actions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009921

    Original file (AR20140009921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a GCM and he received a BCD.