Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020785
Original file (20140020785.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020785 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and a meritorious citation.

2.  The applicant states the AGCM and meritorious citation were not added to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* AGCM Order
* Letter dated 10 July 1967
* Certificate of Achievement

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 7 January 1966.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 62F (Crane Shovel Operator).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

   a.  item 31 (Foreign Service) - he was assigned to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) beginning on 8 September 1966;
   
   b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) - he was assigned to Headquarters and Company A, 704th Maintenance Battalion from 5 April 1966 to 25 April 1967 and Company A, 864th Engineer Battalion from 26 April to 27 July 1967;

   c.  item 38 - the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at each of his active duty assignments; and

   d.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) - shows he earned the following awards:
   
* National Defense Service Medal (NDSM)
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
* RVN Campaign Medal
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* two Overseas Service Bars

4.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any derogatory information or a unit commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from receiving the AGCM.  It contains no evidence to show he was ever awarded or recommended for the AGCM.

5.  On 5 January 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) having completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of creditable active duty service.  The AGCM is not included among the list of awards shown on his DD Form 214.

6.  The applicant provides:

   a.  Headquarters, United States Army Garrison, General Orders Number 2, dated 11 January 1968.  It announced his award of the AGCM for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity for the period 7 January 1966 to 6 January 1968; and
   
   b.  a Certificate of Achievement awarded him in recognition of meritorious performance of duty in support of military engineering operations in the RVN during the period 24 April to 7 August 1967.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.

   a.  Chapter 4 of the awards regulation prescribes the policy for award of the AGCM.  It states that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stipulated that in order to qualify for the AGCM, a member must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.
   
   b.  Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during the applicant's service in Vietnam, he participated in the following two campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III

8.  Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) establishes the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  It confirms that during the applicant's tenure of assignment in the RVN, his units:

* 704th Maintenance Battalion was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal with First Class Unit Citation
* 864th Engineer Battalion was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 March 1967 through 31 December 1968 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the AGCM and a meritorious citation.  There is sufficient evidence to support granting a portion of the requested relief.
2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his active duty service and his OMPF is void of any derogatory information or a unit commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the AGCM.  In addition, he provides evidence to show he was awarded the AGCM in official orders subsequent his REFRAD, which indicates why it is not currently listed on his DD Form 214.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected at this time to show this award.

3.  Further, based on the applicant's service and campaign participation in the RVN, he is also authorized the Meritorious Unit Commendation, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal with First Class Unit Citation, and two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded VSM. Thus, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his 
DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant is advised that Certificates of Achievement are not formal Army awards and that there are no provisions for adding one to his DD Form 214.  Therefore, the Certificate of Achievement he receive for his meritorious performance of duty does not meet the regulatory criteria necessary for inclusion on the applicant's 5 January 1968 separation document.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by:

	a.  deleting the Vietnam Service Medal and

	b.  adding the following awards:
   
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars
* Meritorious Unit Commendation
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal with First Class Unit Citation
   
2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding his Certificate of Achievement to his DD Form 214.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020785





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020785



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011544

    Original file (20120011544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show additional medals, ribbons, or awards that are not listed, including the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 22 November 1966 through 23 August 1969 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015169

    Original file (20110015169.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) * Purple Heart with one Oak Leaf Cluster * Air Medal (AM) with "V" Device and Numeral 7 * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one silver and two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) * RVN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012793

    Original file (20120012793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007118C070206

    Original file (20050007118C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he would like his military records corrected to show he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008409

    Original file (20120008409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains four DD Forms 214. a. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (3rd Award) for this period and to correct his final DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, 83d Ordnance Battalion (Ammunition), General Orders Number 3, dated 7 March 1963, to show the period for the AGCM (2nd Award) as "28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007971

    Original file (20120007971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he is authorized two Bronze Star Medals (BSM's). His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the: * RVN Campaign Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with two bronze service stars * National Defense Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge 9. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 22 August 1966 to 21 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016550

    Original file (20140016550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 38 (Record of Assignments): Company A, 36th Engineer Battalion, Vietnam, 1 September 1967 to 9 January 1968, and he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service * item 41 (Awards and Decorations): * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) 4. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 25 January 1966 through 11...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019068

    Original file (20130019068.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (2nd Award), AGCM, and Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 July 1964 through 27 May 1967 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017986

    Original file (20130017986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his foreign service in the RVN and his awards and decorations, as recommended below. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005231

    Original file (20090005231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. Therefore, it would be appropriate to accept the date provided by the applicant as the most accurate date, and to award him the PH for wounds received as a result of hostile action in the RVN in June 1967; and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result,...