Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020760
Original file (20140020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  9 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020760 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by adding the suffix "Sr." to his last name.

2.  The applicant states his last name was legally changed to add the suffix "Sr."

3.  The applicant provides a court order, dated 14 November 2014.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant retired in the rank of sergeant first class on 31 January 2000 after completing over 22 years of creditable active duty service.

3.  Item 1 (Name) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not show any suffix.

4.  He provided a court order, dated 14 November 2014, adding the suffix "Sr." to his last name.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214 and states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his retirement.

2.  The evidence shows he added the suffix "Sr." to his last name in November 2014, over 14 years after his retirement on 31 January 2000.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.

4.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document which confirms his legal name change will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the difference in the name recorded on his DD Form 214 and to satisfy his desire to have his current legal name documented in his military records.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ___X_____  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020760



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020760



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011517

    Original file (20090011517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his full name in item 1 (Name (Last, First, Middle)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 July 1992 be changed to include the suffix Senior (SR). A DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 July 1986 shows the applicant served in the Regular Army from 22 September 1983 to 21 July 1986.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004721

    Original file (20130004721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 4 for this reenlistment shows he listed the suffix "Jr." after his last name. The evidence of record shows he authenticated several documents in his military records. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001524

    Original file (20150001524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military service records to show his court-ordered last name. He has taken action to change his name on other records and forms of identification and would like his military service records to reflect the legal name change. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, the applicant offers insufficient evidence to warrant a change to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011358

    Original file (20140011358.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show his birth name. A DA Form 3284-R (Applicant's Statement of Name Change), dated 4 March 1974, shows in: * item 1 (Name as Recorded on Birth Certificate): ""B____, M____ C____" * item 5 (Name You Prefer to Use): "I____, M____ C____" * he signed the document with the name "M____ C. I____" 4. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014747

    Original file (20130014747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the last name listed in his military records has the wrong suffix. His record contains the following: * DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) which lists his full name as Rxxxxxx Lxxxxxx Lxxxxxxx III * DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) which lists his full name as Rxxxxxx Lxxxxxx Lxxxxxxx III 3. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015049

    Original file (20130015049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to list his full name as Hxxxx Cxxxxxxx Gxxxxx II vice Hxxxx Cxxxxxxx Gxxxxx Jr. 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant used the suffix "Jr" with his name during his periods of service in the AUS and USAR. Therefore, his military records and DD Form 214 are correct as currently constituted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003076

    Original file (20140003076.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This document was certified by the applicant on 19 April 1976 and recertified by the applicant on 1 June 1976 and it shows in: a. section I (Personal Data), block 1 (Name - Last, First, Middle), his last name as "V---i--;" b. section III (Verification of Personal Data), item 23 (If Preferred Enlistment Name (name given in block 1) is not the same as on your birth certificate and has not been changed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020456

    Original file (20130020456.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the military under the last name "R-----." ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130020456 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130020456 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027712

    Original file (20100027712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The evidence of record shows his name consistently appeared as "D---d A----w M--s" without the suffix "Jr." on every document in his available service personnel and medical records throughout his period of military service. Based on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051719C070420

    Original file (2001051719C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The reviewer on the contested NCOER added a statement of non-concurrence, in which he commented that since the last rating period the applicant had not shown the desire to become a team member. Notwithstanding the applicant’s contention that he should be reinstated in the AGR program based on a successful appeal of the contested NCOER, given the approved portions of the...