Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020353
Original file (20140020353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    25 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020353 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that his record does not include the CIB that he earned. 

3.  The applicant provides his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 November 1970.  After completing basic and advanced individual training he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 44A (Metalworking Apprentice).  He served in Vietnam from 3 November 1971 to 27 January 1972. 
3.  He submitted and his record contains a DA Form 20 that shows in:

	a.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) while serving in Vietnam he was assigned to the 156th Maintenance Company performing duties in MOS 44A until his departure. 

	b.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for the CIB.

4.  On 28 April 1972, the applicant was retired from active duty due to temporary disability.  He had completed 1 year, 5 months, and 12 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued does not show he was awarded the CIB.

5.  A review of his available personnel service records failed to show any evidence and he did not provide any evidence that shows he performed the duties of an infantryman in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, there is no evidence showing that he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders for the CIB pertaining to the applicant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB there must be evidence not only that a member held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned to a qualifying infantry unit but also that the member was personally present and participated with his qualifying infantry unit while the unit engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  The applicant was assigned to a maintenance unit and there is no evidence that he held an infantry MOS while participating in active ground combat with enemy forces.  As such, he did not meet the minimum criteria for award of the CIB.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting his request.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020353



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020353



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004100

    Original file (20130004100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * His DD Form 214 * Orders from the U.S. Army Reserve dated 21 March 1973 * Orders assigning him to the 121st Aviation Company, dated 4 June 1968 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * A 10-page self-authored letter * Information on Pathfinders * A picture of himself as a Pathfinder in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show he was awarded the CIB. He also provides...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002760

    Original file (20130002760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and "Wings" (correctly known as the Aircraft Crew Member Badge during the Vietnam era and currently known as the Aviation Badge); and b. the issuance of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. There is no evidence of record which shows he served in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001476

    Original file (20120001476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows multiple awards but does not show award of the CIB. However, the evidence of record shows he held a logistics MOS and served with his cavalry unit as a supply specialist/sergeant. Regretfully, in the absence of conclusive evidence that the applicant held an infantry MOS, was assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019916

    Original file (20100019916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states he served in Vietnam as an infantryman and was never awarded the CIB. Absent this evidence, there is insufficient evidence upon which to award the CIB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000840

    Original file (20090000840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 22 July 1969. The fact that the applicant provided an internet article recounting a booby trap incident that occurred on 15 April 1970, is not sufficient evidence to show that he was assigned to C Company, 4th Battalion, 3d Infantry at the time of the incident. In any case, there is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant should be awarded the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024765

    Original file (20110024765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013558

    Original file (20100013558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There is no evidence of record which shows he was awarded an infantry MOS. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016519

    Original file (20090016519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There are no orders in the applicant’s personnel records to show that he was awarded the CIB. In the absence of evidence that the applicant actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit and holding an infantry MOS, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the CIB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020234

    Original file (20090020234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. In the absence of evidence that he served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the CIB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014032

    Original file (20140014032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although his military occupational specialty (MOS) was "31B20 Infantry Radio Maintenance," he deserves award of the CIB, because he served with the "2/7th Cavalry Infantry Air Mobile" in the RVN and spent 354 days in the field in a combat zone. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1...