Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020190
Original file (20140020190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020190 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show in item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) that his specialty number and title were 64B2O – Heavy Wheel Vehicle Driver.

2.  The applicant states that his first advanced individual training (AIT) was for military occupational specialty (MOS) 64A1O (light wheel vehicle driver) and his second AIT was at Fort Carson, Colorado for MOS 64B2O.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and separation orders showing his MOS as 64B2O.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 18 March 1969.  He completed his basic training at Fort Bliss, Texas and his AIT as a 64A1O at Fort Polk, Louisiana.  He was then transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado for on-the-job training as a 64B2O. 

3.  He completed his training and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas where he remained until he was transferred to Vietnam on 15 March 1970.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 in MOS 64B2O on 1 June 1970 and to the pay grade of E-4 in MOS 64B2O on 5 November 1970.

4.  He departed Vietnam on 6 February 1971 and was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 10 months and 21 days of active service.

5.  The applicant’s separation orders show his MOS as 64B2O; however, his DD Form 214 shows in block 23a that his specialty number and title are "64A1O LT VEH DRV." 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his specialty number and title as “64B2O – Heavy Wheel Vehicle Driver” has been noted and found to have merit.

2.  The applicant successfully completed training as a 64B2O – Heavy Wheel Vehicle Driver and was advanced to the pay grades of E-3 and E-4 in that specialty.

3.  Accordingly, 64B2O became his primary specialty and should be reflected on his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in block 23a of his DD Form 214 that his specialty number and title are “64B2O – Heavy Wheel Vehicle Driver”.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020190





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020190



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015978

    Original file (20090015978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that Item 23 (Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be changed to 64B2O. The applicant wants his MOS changed from MOS 64A1O to MOS 64B2O.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001147

    Original file (20120001147.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 includes an entry showing he was assigned to duty MOS 64B2O with the 134th Quartermaster Company effective 22 March 1970. Three typewritten entries subsequent to the lined-through entry show he was assigned to the 134th and 514th Quartermaster Companies in duty MOS 94B2O with principal duty as a cook. The applicant's record shows he held primary MOS 64B2O, and, based on a lined-through entry on his DA Form 20, it appears there may have been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011795

    Original file (20110011795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 22 (MOS) he was awarded MOS 64A on 27 September 1968 * item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 11 November 1968 through 25 January 1970 [actually 21 January 1970] * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he performed duties as a Light and Heavy Vehicle Driver in MOS 64B in Vietnam * item 38 he was assigned to Company C, 75th Support Battalion, 1st Infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016194

    Original file (20100016194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available record and he has not provided any to show he held the MOS 11D as his primary MOS after January 1970. The evidence shows he served in MOS 64B during his tours in Korea and in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018649

    Original file (20080018649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Division (Americal) Special Orders Number 212, dated 31 July 1971, promoted the applicant to specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4, withdrew his MOS of 64A1O, and awarded him MOS 63B2O. Headquarters, 3rd Battalion, 82nd Field Artillery, Promotion Standing List, dated 24 January 1972, provided by the applicant, lists the applicant in promotion standing to E-5 and shows his MOS as 13E2O and date selected as 23 January 1972. In order to justify correction of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012467

    Original file (20060012467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant’s military records which shows that he ever served as a Heavy Equipment Operator. Absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant was awarded a different MOS for a Heavy Equipment Operator, regularity must be presumed in this case. However, as the applicant did not request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show this MOS and title, no action will be taken at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010816

    Original file (20080010816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He contends the Army has no record of his service in France on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 did not show any of his service in France. Contrary to his contentions, his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 3 January 1966, correctly shows that he served in USAREUR for a period of 1 year, 10 months, and 20 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007850

    Original file (20080007850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for correction of his military service records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The SF 189 shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant requested his “total service record book including medical.” The NA Form 13045 shows that the applicant was informed the medical records he requested were lent to the Veterans Administration and referred the applicant to the VA claim number. The evidence of record shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002102

    Original file (20120002102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed his training and was awarded MOS 57A (Duty Soldier) on 9 April 1969. His record is void of his discharge packet; however, discharge orders, dated 4 October 1971, show he was discharged on 5 October 1971 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, paragraph 6(b), for unsuitability due to character and behavior disorder with a general discharge and the issuance of a DD Form 257A (General Discharge Certificate). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016786

    Original file (20100016786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, states the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Army Regulations governing the preparation of separation documents required the listing of a Soldier's primary MOS at the time of separation; therefore, his DD Form 214 is correct as stated and he is not entitled to amendment of his DD Form 214 to add MOS 11B2O to item 23a. As a result, the Board...