Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019901
Original file (20140019901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140019901 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his date of birth (DOB) as XX January 19XX vice XX June 19XX.

2.  The applicant states his DOB is incorrect on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, his reconstructed record contains sufficient documents to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG) on 1 November 1965.  His reconstructed record contains his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 1 November 1965, wherein his DOB is listed as XX January 19XX.

4.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) and he entered active duty on 26 March 1967.  His reconstructed record contains a Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and SF 89 (Report of Medical History), both dated 31 March 1967, wherein each shows his DOB as XX January 19XX.

5.  He was released from ADT on 23 July 1967 to the control of the OHARNG.  Item 9 (DOB) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows his DOB as XX June 19XX.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms when the applicant enlisted in the OHARNG on 1 November 1965 his DOB was listed as XX January 19XX.  This is the DOB that is shown on his SF 88 and SF 89 that were completed on 31 March 1967 during his active duty service.  It appears an error occurred during the preparation of his DD Form 214 and his DOB was inadvertently entered as XX June 19XX.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his DOB as it is shown on his DD Form 4.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by deleting the entry in item 9 and replacing it with the DOB listed on his DD Form 4, dated 1 November 1965.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019901



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019901



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001601

    Original file (20150001601.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant's DOB was listed as 26 March 1945 upon his enlistment in the MDARNG and this is the DOB he used throughout his military service. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his DOB as 26 March 1945. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show his SSN as it is shown on his social security card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013445

    Original file (20110013445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his date of birth (DOB) as "22 September 19xx" vice "27 September 19xx." The applicant's record shows, in conjunction with his induction into the Army of the United States (AUS), a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction), dated 23 April 1965, was completed wherein his DOB was listed as "27 September 19xx." The evidence of record shows the applicant listed his DOB as 22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007903

    Original file (20120007903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his date of birth (DOB) as 18 October instead of 18 September. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty at Fort Buchanan, PR, on 30 July 1952.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000132

    Original file (20110000132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's SF 88, dated 29 November 1965, found him medically qualified for military service and he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 14 January 1966. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-9, provided that individuals who were not medically qualified under procurement medical standards when accepted for induction or initial enlistment would be discharged when a medical board, regardless of the date completed, established that a medical condition was identified by appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001531

    Original file (20150001531.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In connection with his induction into the Army of the United States (AUS), the applicant completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) and listed his DOB as 11 August 19XX. Item 9 (DOB) of his DD Form 214 lists his DOB as 8 November 19XX. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his DOB as shown on his DD Form 398 (11 August 19XX).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012246

    Original file (20130012246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct date of birth (DOB) and social security number (SSN). The applicant's DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows in item 5 (DOB): "18 Nov 1946." The evidence of record shows the U.S. Army was not using the SSN as identification at the time the applicant entered active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013632

    Original file (20100013632.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his correct date of birth (DOB) and Social Security Number (SSN). The evidence of record also shows that Army officials incorrectly recorded the applicant's DOB on his DD Form 47 and DD Form 214. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, it is concluded that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015993

    Original file (20110015993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. The applicant contends he was awarded the Purple Heart because he was wounded in action while serving in Vietnam in 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007636

    Original file (20140007636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record includes a letter from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, dated 13 March 1991, which issued him a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) amending his DD Form 214 to show "533-XX-XXXX." With respect to the DOB, the evidence indicates an administrative error was made when recording the applicant's DOB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003425

    Original file (20140003425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This case is being considered using a reconstructed NPRC record that includes a few original official military personnel file documents and his DD Form 214. The majority of the available documents contained in the applicant's NPRC reconstructed file list his assigned service number and do not contain an SSN. Absent convincing independent and verifiable evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the applicant's military service records, including the DD Form 214, were correct at the time...